:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:主線收費及匝道收費政策下之擁擠定價分析
書刊名:運輸計劃
作者:褚志鵬 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Chih-peng
出版日期:2001
卷期:30:3
頁次:頁513-537
主題關鍵詞:主線收費匝道收費道路擁擠定價收費政策Mainline tollRamp tollRoad congestion pricing policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究主旨在於討論次佳道路定價政策下主線收費(mainline toll)及匝道收費(ramp toll)不同政策對政府收取費額、道路旅次變化以及福利增減情形。道路擁擠收費概念始於1920年的擁擠稅理論,而後許多國家開始嘗試運用道路定價政策,希望能藉由增加使用成本減緩人民對道路使用的需求,以改善其所面對的交通擁擠問題。而在實際理論發展上,許多學者研究不同之定價政策,但對於不同收費方式主線:收費及匝道收費之研究尚不多見,故本研究設計一具代表又簡單之路網模型,討論主線收費及區進收費政策對道路旅次流量的改變,政府收取費用之變化,以及路網福利的變動。本研究同時也沿用以往多數學者採用之其他不同道路定價政策:不收費政策及最通道路定價政策,於本研究中于以一併分析比較。
This paper investigates congestion tolls under two different toll collection schemes: mainline collection and ramp co/lection. Our analyses also focus on the changes of flow pattern and system welfare for these two toll collection schemes. Congestion pricing has long been a notable research subject of traffic management and transportation policy. It is also an interesting topic for economists and transportation planners from both in theoretical and practical point of views. Most research focuses on the discussions on different pricing policies. However, few research considers the impacts of the main-line to/l and ramp to/l co/lection schemes. In this research we designed a simple but representative model to provide a quantity analysis of the changes of toll, flow pattern, and social welfare under the second best pricing policies. The cases of no toll and first best pricing policy are also discussed.
期刊論文
1.Verhoef, Erik、Nijkamp, Peter、Rietveld, Piet(1995)。Second-Best Regulation of Road Transport Externalities。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,29(2),147-167。  new window
2.Liu, Louie-Nan、McDonald, J. F.(1999)。Economic efficiency of second-best congestion pricing schemes in urban highway systems。Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,33(3),157-188。  new window
3.Marchand, M.(1968)。A Note on Optimal Tolls in an Imperfect Environment。Econometrica,36(3/4),575-581。  new window
4.McDonald, J. F.(1995)。Urban Highway Congestion - An Analysis of Second-Best Tolls。Transportation,22(4),353-369。  new window
5.賴禎秀、李明儒、蔡仁偉(1997)。階梯式收費結構下通勤者之均衡行為模式。運輸計劃季刊,26(4),593-613。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Arnott, R.、Kraus, M.(1998)。When Are Anonymous Congestion Charges Consistent with Marginal Cost Pricing。Journal of Public Economics,67,45-64。  new window
7.Morrison, Steven A.(1986)。A Survey of Road Pricing。Transportation Research Part A: General,20(2),87-97。  new window
8.Yang, H.、Lam, W. H. K.(1996)。Optimal Road Tolls under Conditions of Queueing and Congestion。Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice,30(5),319-332。  new window
9.Yang, H.、Bell, M. G. H.(1997)。Traffic Restraint, Road Pricing and Network Equilibrium。Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological,31(4),303-314。  new window
10.Chen, T. T.、Lan, L. W.(1999)。Bottleneck Traffic Congestion under Alternative Work Schedules with Various Step-toll Schemes。Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,3(6),327-341。  new window
11.賴禎秀(2000)。最佳單階段與兩階段擁擠收費下通勤者出發時刻變動行為之經濟分析。運輸計劃季刊,29(2),253-280。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.藍武王、張勝雄(1987)。道路擁擠費之設計與分析。中華民國運輸學會第二屆論文研討會,15(1)-15(19)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.葉岦陞、褚志鵬(2000)。道路擁擠收費政策在考量異質旅次之靜態分析。沒有紀錄。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭淑穎(1996)。高速公路擁擠稅之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Khisty, C. J.(1990)。Transportation Engineering and Introduction。Transportation Engineering and Introduction。沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Johansson, B.、Mattsson, L. G.(1995)。Road Pricing: Theory, Empirical Assessment and Policy。Road Pricing: Theory, Empirical Assessment and Policy。Boston, MA。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top