:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸交流與兩韓關係之比較
書刊名:問題與研究
作者:朱松柏
作者(外文):Chu, Song-por
出版日期:2001
卷期:40:6
頁次:頁1-12
主題關鍵詞:兩岸交流兩韓關係統一政策談判過程經濟合作社會文化交流Cross-strait exchangeUnification policyNegotiation processEconomic cooperationSocial and cultural exchange
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:27
     比較海峽兩岸與兩韓現況有甚多差異之處,目前兩韓各自為獨立主權國家,分別為聯合國與其他國際組織的會員國,國際地位與影響力不分軒輊,軍事力量更是旗鼓相當,但是經濟實力上南韓佔有絕對的優勢。反觀海峽兩岸,中共是聯合國常任理事國,國際地位與影響力遠遠超過臺灣,在經濟實力方面也後來居上,中共更因軍事與經濟力量的日趨壯大,已成為東亞的區域強權。 比較兩岸交流與兩韓關係過去十多年來的發展,可以發現不論在統一政策、談判過程、經濟社會文化交流等方面,兩岸是屬於民間主導型,一切合作與交流計畫皆由民間積極規劃推動;而兩韓則屬於政府主導型,所有接觸談判、合作交流與民間往來都受到政府嚴密的管制,雙方各有優缺點也各有利弊得失,相互學習截長補短應是雙方政府與人民的共同願望。 廿一世紀是和平與和解的世紀,吾人期盼兩岸交流和兩韓關係能夠在現有的基礎上,繼續穩健向前推展,共同為東亞地區的和平、繁榮與穩定作出積極的貢獻。
     Comparing the ROC-PRC relationship with that of the one between the ROK and the DPRK reveals many differences. At present the two Koreas are not only independent sovereign nations but are also members of the United Nations and other international organizations having equal international status and influence as well as military capability. In term of economic strength, however, South Korea has absolute superiority over the North. In the case of the ROC-PRC relationship, however, the PRC is a member of the UN Permanent Security Council and its international status and influence far surpasses that of the ROC. The PRC's economic clout is also catching up with that of the ROC. The PRC, moreover, has become a regional power in East Asia by dint of its growing economic and military strength. A comprison of the development in cross-strait relations and between the ROK and DPRK over the past 10 years also shows many different interactions. In cross-strait relations, such issues as national unification, negotiation process, and economic, social and cultural interactions have been conducted by semiofficial agencies. All-cooperative and exchange programs were actively carried out by non-government organizations. In the case of the two Koreas, however, negotiations, cooperative programs, and civilian contacts were carried out and closely controlled by the government. The strengths and weaknesses of both sides, and their advantages and disadvantages, are thus exposed and both sides have a common desire to learn from each other's strengths and weaknesses. The 21st century is full of hope for peaces and reconciliation. Many hope that based on their current achievements, cross-strait and ROK-DPRK relations will further stabilize so that all four can actively contribute to maintaining regional peace, prosperity, and stability.
期刊論文
1.張惠玲(20000700)。兩岸政治談判的困境與未來。共黨問題研究,26(7),72-82。  延伸查詢new window
2.李慶南(200008)。離散家族實態與相逢的歷史。北韓月刊,40。  延伸查詢new window
3.朱松柏(20001000)。南北韓高峰會的意義與前景。問題與研究,39(10),45-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.高有煥(1999)。南北韓民間交流與合作的諸問題。北韓月刊,6月號。  延伸查詢new window
5.徐東海(1997)。現階段兩岸經貿關係之評估與展望。共黨問題研究,23(6),4-16。  延伸查詢new window
6.金英潤(2001)。2001年南北經濟合作展望。北韓月刊,47-48。  延伸查詢new window
7.(2001)。診斷南北關係的現況。北韓月刊,2月號。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.朱松柏(1992)。南北韓和談經過及其統一展望。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.金日成(198010)。中央委員會工作總結報告。平壤:外國文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1998)。統一問題理解-統一環境與南北關係。統一問題理解-統一環境與南北關係。韓國,漢城。  延伸查詢new window
3.(1999)。李登輝總統特殊國與國關係中華民國政府說明文件。李登輝總統特殊國與國關係中華民國政府說明文件。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(1974)。北韓全書,下卷。北韓全書,下卷。韓國,漢城。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2000)。大陸情勢。大陸情勢。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.張京育(1999)。大陸政策與兩岸關係答客問。大陸政策與兩岸關係答客問。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(1999)。統一問答。統一問答。韓國,漢城。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(2000)。兩岸經濟統計月報,臺北市:行政院大陸委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.(1995)。國家統一綱領,0。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top