:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大專學生網路沈迷行為及其徑路模式之驗証研究
書刊名:中華輔導學報
作者:徐西森 引用關係連廷嘉 引用關係
作者(外文):Shyu, Shi-senLian, Ting-jia
出版日期:2001
卷期:10
頁次:頁119-150
主題關鍵詞:大專學生網路沈迷徑路模式College studentInternet addictionPath model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(17) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:17
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:50
大專學生網路沈迷之行為問題,已成為當代國內外教育、心理、科技與諮商輔導等頜域專家學者之學術研究與社會關懷的重要課題。本研究旨在探討大專學生之網路心理需求、休閒生活焜劃、網路使用行為及其網路沈迷的原因,並了解不同性別之大專學生網路沈迷行為的差異情形,進而驗証大專學生網路沈迷行為徑路模式的適合度。本研究隨機取樣北、中、南三區六所大專院校八十九學年度之日問部學生二百一十三人為調查對象,調查工具係研究者參考張玉鈴(民87)、楊佳幸(民90)等人研究量表而自編之「大專生網路使用行為調查問卷」。調查所得資料以多變項變異數分析、積差相關、迴歸分析及線性結構關係分析等統計方法處理之。研究結果如下:一、男性大專生較女性大專生容易有網路沈迷的傾向。二、休閒內在動機與休閒無聊感之問有顯著負相關;又休閒無聊感與網路使用行為、網路心理需求、網路沈迷行為之問呈現正相關。三、休閒內在動機、休閒阻礙、休閒無聊感、網路使用行為以及網路心理需求等因素對個體網路沈迷行為具有聯合預到的功能。四、大專學生網路心理需求中的「親和性需求 J 最能有效預劃其網路沈迷行為。其他的影響因素依序為「虛擬情感」、「休閒桃戰」、「結構阻礙」、「休閒娛樂」、「自主需求」、「休閒自我決定」及「資訊使用」。 五、大專學生綱路沈迷行爲逕路模式之驗證,並不符合原告設定的理論架構,未來仍須更多的資料加以考驗。 本研究根據研究結果,提出大專院校諮商輔導工作之相關建議,藉供專業人員參考。
The problem of college student Internet addiction has become an important issue that draws attention from the general public as well as scholars of different fields. This research aims to find out the psychological need of college students for using the Internet, how they utilize it and the reasons for their addiction. There is also a comparison between male and female students concerning their differences in Internet addiction. This research then moves on to find out the validity of the path model in such addiction. In this research, the subjects were 213 college students in the day division, randomly chosen from six different schools located in various parts of Taiwan. The instrument used in this research was a self-compiled questionnaire based on the evaluation form by Yu-Ling Chang (1998) and Jia-Hsing Yang (2001). The data collected were processed by using MANOVA, product-moment correlation, Regression analysis, and linear structure analysis. The results are as follows: 1 Male college students show a stronger tendency toward Internet addiction than female college students. 2 There is a negative correlation between motives for leisure activities and leisure boredom, whereas a positive correlation exists between the leisure boredom and the Internet activity, Internet psychological need and Internet addiction. 3. The factors that can predict individual addiction include intrinsic leisure motivation, leisure constraints, leisure boredom, Internet activity and the psychological need for the Internet. 4. The most successful element in predicting Internet addiction is the need for affinity, followed by virtual feelings, leisure challenges, structural constraints, recreation, the need for autonomy, self-decided leisure activities and the use of information, arranged according to their degree of influence. 5. Net addiction path model basically does not conform to the study of the previously proposed theoretical framework.
期刊論文
1.Morahan-Martin, J.(1999)。The Relationship between Loneliness and Internet Use and Abuse。CyberPsychology & Behavior,2(5),431-439。  new window
2.施香如(20010500)。迷惘、迷網--談青少年網路使用與輔導。學生輔導,74,18-25。  延伸查詢new window
3.Shotton, M. A.(1991)。The costs and benefits of 'computer addiction'。Behaviour & Information Technology,10(3),219-230。  new window
4.Young, Kimberly S.(1998)。Internet addition: The emergence of a new clinical disorder。Cyber Psychology and Behavior,1(3),237-244。  new window
5.Lin, S. S. J.、Tsai, C. C.(2002)。Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents。Computers in Human Behavior,18(4),411-427。  new window
6.Iso-Ahola, Seppo E.、Weissinger, E.(1987)。Leisure and boredom。Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,5(3),356-364。  new window
7.Morahan-Martin, J.、Schumacher, P.(2000)。Incidence and Correlates of Pathological Internet Use among College Students。Computers in Human Behavior,16(1),13-29。  new window
8.Armstrong, Lynette、Phillips, James G.、Saling, Lauren L.(2000)。Potential determinants of heavier internet usage。International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,53(4),537-550。  new window
9.Weissinger, E.、Bandalos, D. L.(1995)。Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measure intrinsic motivation in leisure。Journal of Leisure Research,27(4),379-400。  new window
10.Kraut, Robert E.、Patterson, Michael、Lundmark, Vicki、Kiesler, Sara、Mukopadhyay, Tridas、Scherlis, William(1998)。Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-being?。American Psychologist,53(9),1017-1031。  new window
11.Raymore, L. A.、Godbey, G. C.、Crawford, D. W.、Von Eye, A.(1993)。Nature and process of leisure constraints: An empirical test。Leisure Sciences,15(2),99-113。  new window
12.Kandell, J. J.(1998)。Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students。CyberPsychology & Behavior,1(1),11-17。  new window
13.莊道明(19980900)。從臺灣學術網路使用調查解析網路虛擬社群價值觀。資訊傳播與圖書館學,5(1),52-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Morrissey, M.(1998)。ACES Technology Internet Network drafts technology competencies for students。Counseling Today,6,21-28。  new window
15.Gabrieal, M. A.(1998)。Boredom: Exploration of a developmental perspective。Clinical Social Work Journal,163,156-164。  new window
16.Griffiths, M.、Miller, H.、Gillespie, T.、Sparrow, P.(1999)。Internet usage and internet addiction in students and its implications for learning。Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,15(1),85-90。  new window
17.Hamilton, J. A.(1981)。Attention, personality, and the self-regulation of mood: Absorbing interest and boredom。Progress in Experimental Personality Research,10,281-315。  new window
18.Metchik, E.(1997)。A typology of crime on the Internet。Security Journal,9,27-31。  new window
會議論文
1.周榮、周倩(1997)。網路上癮現象、網路使用行為與傳播快感經驗之相關性初探。中華傳播學會1997年會,(會議日期: 1997年6月18-19日)。臺北:中華傳播學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.周倩(2000)。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳淑惠(1999)。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象之整合研究--子計畫 一:網路沉迷現象的心理病因之初探 (計畫編號:NSC 89-2511-S-002-010-N)。  延伸查詢new window
2.周倩(1999)。我國學生電腦網路沉迷現象之整合研究--子計畫二:網路沉迷現象之教育傳播觀點研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.交通部統計處(1998)。民眾使用網際網路狀況調查報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林家弘(2000)。我國大學生網路學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊佳幸(2001)。高雄區大學生網路使用行為、網路心理需求與網路沉迷關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉守信(2000)。青少年網路使用行為與輔導方案之研究--以新竹市為例(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃瓊慧(2000)。從沈浸(flow)理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.蕭銘鈞(1998)。台灣大學生網路使用行為、使用動機、滿足程度與網路成癮現象之初探(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱美慧(2000)。我國大專學生個人特性、網路使用行為與網路成癮關係之研究(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張玉鈴(1998)。大學生休閒內在動機、休閒阻礙與其休閒無聊感及自我統合之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Glasser, W.(1984)。Control Theory。New York, NY:Harper & Row。  new window
2.Postman, Neil(1985)。Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business。New York:Penguin Books。  new window
3.Cooke, A.(1996)。The Economics of Leisure and Sport。The Economics of Leisure and Sport。Wadsworth:Thomson Publishing Inc.。  new window
4.陳正昌、程炳林(1998)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃國彥(2001)。網路中的衝突與合作。e世代心理學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.藍三印(2001)。網路中的自我。e世代心理學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.廖瑞銘(2001)。電腦網路e癮。e世代心理學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gackenbach, J.、Ellerman, E.(1998)。Introduction to psychological aspects of internet use。Psychology and the Internet。San Diego。  new window
其他
1.Suler, J. R.(1996)。Computer and cyberspace addiction,0。  new window
2.Young, K. S.(1997)。Frequently asked questions,0。  new window
3.財團法人資訊工業策進會(2001)。我國網際網路用戶數達674萬-撥接用戶市場漸趨飽和,本季成長率創歷史新低,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.蕃薯藤數位科技股份有限公司(2000)。2000臺灣網路使用調查,0。  延伸查詢new window
5.Anderson, K. J.(2000)。Internet use among college students: An exploratory study,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.Haggard, L. M.、Williams, D. R.(1991)。Self-identity benefits of leisure activities。Benefits of Leisure。State College , PA:Venture Press。  new window
2.林美珍(2001)。網際網路使用的心理學面面觀。e世代心理學。臺北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE