:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:輪椅桌球選手擊球範圍之探討--以我國男子第四級與第五級選手為例
書刊名:國立臺灣體育學院學報
作者:詹勝淵吳昇光 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Sheng-yuanWu, sheng-kuang
出版日期:2002
卷期:11
頁次:頁147-162
主題關鍵詞:輪椅桌球擊球距離Wheel-chaired table tennisStroking distance
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:30
  • 點閱點閱:29
     本研究針對我國男子第四級與第五級輪椅桌球選手進行擊球距離測量,採取(1)軀幹不動(2)軀幹可動、未執拍手抓輪椅(3)軀幹可動、未執拍手不抓輪椅三種方式,量取正手側、網前正手側、正前方、網前反手側、反手側五個擊球點的單一平面距離。所有資料以SPSS for windows 8.01版統計套裝軟體處理,獲致以下結果: 在軀幹不動的情況下,各組間並沒有差異出現。 非執拍手不抓輪椅,若無非執拍手的支撐力量,第四級的選手在上述擊球距離的測試中明顯弱於第五級的選手。 第四級和第五級總體的比較,在抓輪椅網前正手側、抓輪椅正前方、抓輪椅網前反手側、抓輪椅反手側、不抓輪椅正手側、不抓輪椅網前正手側、不抓輪椅正前方、不抓輪椅網前反手側、不抓輪椅反手側這九個項目都達到顯著差異,證明第五級選手在擊球距離上明顯比第四級選手優秀,顯見第四級選手更需要非執拍手抓握輪椅來增進本身功能。
     This research focuses on testing the differences of the stroking distances of class 4 and class 5 wheel-chaired table tennis players. We use the following three formats to proceed with the research: (1)test without moving the body, (2)test with movable body, and the hand which is not necessary for holding the racket holds the wheelchair, and (3)test with movable body, and the hand which is not necessary for holding the racket doesn't hold the wheelchair. The aim of the test is to measure the single-planar distance of the 5 stroking points (the forehand side, the net front forehand side, the front area, the net front backhand side and the backhand side). All the data are handled by the statistical software SPSS for windows of version 8.01, and we get the following result: Under the condition of not moving the body (Test 1), there are no differences shown between the 2 groups (class 4 and class 5 players). In test 2 (the test with movable body, and the hand that is not necessary for holding the racket holds the wheelchair), if the players don't have the supportive power of the other hand (the hand which doesn't need to hold the racket), class 4 players are obviously weaker than class 5 players. Conclusively, the differences between class 4 players and class 5 players are obviously shown in the following 9 points: the net front forehand side, the front area, the net front backhand side and the backhand side with holding the wheelchair, and the forehand side, the net front forehand side, the front area, the net front backhand side and the backhand side without holding the wheelchair. And all these prove that class 5 players are obviously better then the class 4 players in stroking distance, and it's necessary for level 4 players to use the other hand to help holding the wheelchair in order to improve his/her performance.
期刊論文
1.朱昌勇(19941200)。1993年美國桌球公開賽女子單打決賽技術分析研究。政大體育,7,171-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.詹勝淵、吳昇光(20010800)。輪椅桌球選手運動極限研究--分析我國男子第四級單打。大專體育,55,21-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林光華(1994)。桌球體位分級--脊髓損傷與小兒麻痺。殘障體育運動會刊,2,18-20。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃振華(1998)。男子輪椅桌球第五級國手排名賽之技術分析。文化體育,14,31-47。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃振華(1996)。輪椅桌球之站位方式及操控技巧。殘障體育運動會刊,4,64-65。  延伸查詢new window
6.朱昌勇(19950300)。1994年世界盃男子單打桌球錦標賽技術分析研究。政大體育,8,123-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.朱昌勇(19990200)。1998年世界盃女子桌球賽三段技術分析研究。大專體育,41,53-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Wu, S. K.(1998)。Research in table tennis classification。The meeting of the 1998 World Disability Table Tennis Championships。Paris。  new window
2.Wu, S. K.(2000)。Is the table tennis classification system effective: a performance evaluation。The 5th Paralympic Congress。Sydney, Australia。  new window
圖書
1.童慶康(1979)。桌球基本技術與實際。台北:傳統書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.International Paralympic Committee(1995)。Atlanta Paralympic Games: General and functional classification guide。Atlanta, GA:Atlanta Paralympic Organising Committee。  new window
3.吳昇光(2000)。身心障礙運動分級理論及實務應用。台北:合記。  延伸查詢new window
4.王友信(1985)。現代桌球爭霸術。恆星乒乓研究會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top