:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸於WTO中互動對兩岸關係之影響--與APEC比較
書刊名:理論與政策
作者:趙文衡
作者(外文):Chao, Wen-heng
出版日期:2002
卷期:16:3=63
頁次:頁123-139
主題關鍵詞:世界貿易組織兩岸主權政治互動亞太經濟合作會議WTOCross-strait relationsSovereigntyPolitical interactionsAPEC
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
     兩岸皆已完成WTO入會程序,正式成為WTO會員。WTO因此成為兩岸共同加入的重要國際官方組織,其在WTO中的互動對兩岸關係具有重要意義。加入WTO是否可以改善兩岸關係?兩岸關係是否因此製造出新的互動型態或者因此朝新的方向發展?由於兩岸先前已在APEC中有互動之經驗,本文擬就兩岸之APEC經驗觀察兩岸於WTO可能之互動型態及對兩岸關係之影響。本文將以四種互動型態作為分析之面向:平等會員地位之爭、議題主導權之爭、可從事合作之領域,以及會外互動等,並比較兩岸於此四個面向上的不同以及其對兩岸嫩係之影響。
     Taiwan and China completed their application procedure for accession to WTO this year, and formally became its members. As an international organization with membership from both sides of the Taiwan Strait, WTO has significant meanings for cross-strait interaction sand relations. Will the interactions in WTO improve the cross-strait relations? Will a new pattern of interactions appear between the two sides or will the cross-strait relations head towards a new direction due to their membership in WTO? Since Taiwan and China are also members of another important international organization, APEC, the experiences in the APEC can be useful references for observing their interactions in WTO. Based on the experiences in the APEC, this article will explore the possible interaction pattern between the two sides in the WTO, and its impacts on cross-strait relations.
期刊論文
1.Krebs, Ronald R.(1999)。Perverse Institutionalism: NATO and the Greco-Turkish Conflict。International Organization,53(2),342-377。  new window
2.Grieco, Joseph M.(1988)。Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism。International Organization,42(3),485-507。  new window
3.Keohane, R. O.(1982)。The Demand for International Regimes。International Organization,36(2),141-171。  new window
4.Abbott, K. W.、Snidal, D.(1998)。Why State Act Through Formal International Organizations。Journal of Conflict Resolution,42(1),3-32。  new window
5.Haas, P.(2000)。International Institutions and Social Learning in the Management of Global Environmental Risks。Policy Studies Journal,28(3),558-575。  new window
6.Master, G.(2001)。China, Taiwan, and the World Trade Organization。Washington Quarterly,24(3),45-56。  new window
7.Wang, Zhen Kun(2001)。Joint the Club。World Today,57(10),26-27。  new window
8.Michalopoulos, C.(1999)。The Developing Countries in the WTO。World Economy,22(1),117-143。  new window
圖書
1.Panitchpakd, Supachai、Clifford, Mark L.(2002)。China and the WTO: Changing China, Changing World Trade。Singapore:John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pvt. Ltd。  new window
2.趙文衡(2001)。APEC與兩岸之合作與競爭。APEC與兩岸關係發展之研究。臺北:中華台北APEC研究中心/國立政治大學國際關係研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Anderson, J. J.、Goodman, J. B.(1993)。Mars or Minerva? A United Germany in a Post-Cold War Europe。After the Cold War。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Nicolaidis, K.(1993)。East European Trade in the Aftermath of 1989: Did International Institutions Matter。After the Cold War。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation(1995)。Leaders' Declaration - Japan,沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Keohane, Robert O.(1993)。Institutional Tehroy and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War。Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE