:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:三國兩晉南朝的流徙刑--流刑前史
書刊名:國立政治大學歷史學報
作者:陳俊強
作者(外文):Chen, Chun-keung
出版日期:2003
卷期:20
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:三國兩晉南朝流徙流刑刑罰制度Three KingdomsTwo Jin DynastiesSouthern DynastiesLiuxi banishment exilePunishment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:32
     將罪犯遠逐他方的刑罰,三國以降稱作「流徒刑」。遭流徙者往往是觸犯了嚴重惡行,其中尤以謀反罪為多。這些案例中有部分是謀反者遭減死遠徙,但大多是謀反罪的牽連犯。另外,流徙犯最常被流徒到交州、廣州、越州等嶺南地區,其次是長江下游的揚州 (包括東揚州) 和江州。一般而言,流徙地的選擇與犯行的嚴重性,有某種程度的關連性。遭流徙嶺南者多半犯行嚴重,相較於此,流徙楊州地區者,通常所犯較輕,其目的主要是將人逐出建康的權力中心,而非加以嚴懲,犯人一經流徙,都是終身不得還鄉,下過,歷代帝王下時會下詔恩准這些負釁流徙者,悉聽還本。六朝的流徒刑主要仍是一種代刑的地位,是皇帝給予死刑犯或者嚴重罪惡的牽連犯的一項恩宥。不過,發展到劉宋明帝時期,一度自代刑進而成為正刑的地位,此誠流徒刑的一次變革。及至蕭粱初建,流徒刑被廢止不用,後來雖一度恢復,但最終仍在大同十一年再度被廢。直至南朝覆亡,流徒刑都不復再見,此又流徒刑的另一重大變革,此外,有別於漢代的遷徒刑尚具有經濟開發和解決兵源等作用,六朝的流徒刑似乎只具有法律和政治層面的作用。
     During the period of the Three Kingdoms, the Two Jin, and Southern Dynasties, criminals who committed serious crimes had to go into Liuxi/banishment, especially those who planned to overthrow the government. Some were banished instead of receiving capital punishment, most of them were not the key conspirators in the crime. Besides, most of them were exiled to the Lingnan region like Jiaozhou, Guangzhou & Yuezhou; or provinces near the lower part of Yangtze River, like Yangzhou & Jiangzhou. Normally, the place of exile was related to the seriousness of the crime. The ones exiled to the Lingnan region committed more serious crimes than those who were banished to the Yangzhou areas. The treatment for the latter aimed at separating them from the power core instead of punishing them. Those who were banished were not allowed to return home throughout their lifetime, however the Emperors granted them amnesty from time to time. Originally, banishment was an alternative to death granted by the Emperor, but it evolved to become a for mai punishment between 468AD to 472AD during the reign of Emperor Ming of the Song Dynasty. That was a revolution in banishment. However, banishment was abandoned finally in the 11th year of Tai Tung era (545AD) during the reign of Emperor Wu of the Liang Dynasty and was never re-instituted again. This was another revolution in banishment. To conclude, banishment in the Three Kingdoms, the Two Jin, and Southern Dynasties only served legal & political purposes, instead of the economical and military function s when applied in the Hah Dynasty.
圖書
1.杜佑、王文錦(1989)。通典。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.內田智雄(1970)。譯注續中國歷代刑法志。東京:創文社。  延伸查詢new window
3.許敬宗、阿部隆一、尾崎康(1969)。文館詞林。東京:古典研究會。  延伸查詢new window
4.田餘慶(1989)。東晉門閥政治。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.唐長孺(1992)。魏晉南北朝隋唐史三論。武漢大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.大庭脩(1982)。秦漢法制史の研究。東京:創文社。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉義慶、劉孝標、余嘉錫、周祖謨、余淑宜、周士琦(1993)。世說新語箋疏。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.長孫無忌、劉俊文(1996)。唐律疏議箋解。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.唐玄宗、李林甫、陳仲夫(1992)。唐六典。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
10.仁井田陞、池田溫(19970325)。唐令拾遺補。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.邢義田(1987)。從安土重遷論秦漢時代的徙民與遷徙刑。秦漢史論稿。臺北:東大圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳俊強(2003)。試論唐代流刑的成立及其意義。唐代身分法制研究:以唐律名例律為中心。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.田餘慶(1993)。李嚴興廢與諸葛用人。秦漢魏晉史探微。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE