:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論《尼各馬科倫理學》幸福與德行的關係
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:張勻翔
作者(外文):Chang, Yun Hsiang
出版日期:2003
卷期:30:8=351
頁次:頁39-58
主題關鍵詞:幸福德行終極目的功能論辯證的分析合乎德行的倫理生活靜觀外在善HappinessVirtueThe final aimThe function argumentDialectic analysisMoral lifeContemplationExternal good
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
     亞里斯多德《尼各馬科倫理學》(Nicomachean Ethics)在當今德行倫理學(Virtue Ethics)的討論中時常被提及,其重要性不言而喻。麥金太爾(MacIntyre)認為亞氏倫理學為目的論倫理學(teleological ethics),《尼各馬科倫理學》指出「幸福」(eduaimonia/happiness)為人生的最終目的與最高善,並告訴世人獲致報福的途徑,麥金太爾認為目的概念提出使得道德禁令與未教化的人性二組概念得以連繫。為此,本文目的在嘗試處理二項議題:一、釐清亞氏「幸福」的涵義;二、解釋幸福與德行的關係,說明個人如何藉由德行的實佔成幸福活動的實現與完成。
     In the current discussions about virtue ethics, Aristotle's Nicomchean Ethics is often mentioned, and its importance is ineffable. MacIntyre believes that Aristotle's ethics is teleological ethics, as it's pointed out in Nicomachena Ethics that happiness is the final aim and supreme good of life and the pathways to happiness are also told in the book. For MacIntyre, the proposition of the concept of "aim" connects the concept of moral prohibition with the concept of uncivilized human nature. Consequently, this article is to address two topics: first, clarifying the meaning of Aristotle's "happiness"; second, explaining the connection between happiness and virtue as well as illustrating how one realizes and fulfills the activities of happiness through the practice of virtue.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top