:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:警察形象認知及行銷策略之研究
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:王淑慧
作者(外文):Wang, Shu-hui
出版日期:2003
卷期:37
頁次:頁97-136
主題關鍵詞:形象警察形象形象構面警察形象構面行銷形象行銷警察形象行銷ImagePolice imageImage dimensionsPolice image dimensionsMarketingImage marketingPolice image marketing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:55
長期以來,警察形象頗具爭議性,甚受各界抨擊,本研究以台北市民與警察為研究對象,旨在探討下列兩大議題:(一)台北市民對於警察形象之認知結構:受市民肯定的正面形象為何?受民眾否定的負面形象又為何?民眾認知警察形象之主要來源為何?民眾期望警察之服務與執法角色如何定位?民眾認為警察執法時「情、理、法」順序為何?民眾的社會背景、認知來源及與警察之接觸經驗和管道是否會影響其對於警察形象之認知?(二)根據前述形象調查結果,提出行銷警察正面形象之策略。 本研究的核心概念為警察形象,依據相關學理建構三大構面:機構形象、功能形象與行為形象,據此衍生八項構面:政策形象、信任形象、貢獻形象、聲譽形象、執法形象、服務形象、風紀形象與品牌形象。為提高形象量表之信度與效度,本研究採取兩階段作法:(一)邀請中央警察大學與台北大學學生舉行二次焦點團體座談,決定「警察形象量表」;(二)隨機抽選三十位市民進行前測,以進一步確定問卷的內容與可執行性,計算其Cronbach’α值達0.9481,顯示此份量表已具甚高的信度。 最後實際進行正式調查,成功的樣本數為770位市民,Cronbach’ α為0.7279。效度分析則係運用因素分析法,警察形象的每一構面之特徵值(Eigan value)為1以上,因素負荷量為0.3以上,顯示該量表確具效度。 本研究發現:(一)市民對於警察「機構形象」持最正面的評價,「行為形象」為最負面;「貢獻形象」為最正面,「風紀形象」為最負面。(二)台北市民對於警察形象認知之主要來源為電視、報紙等傳播媒體,親戚朋友轉述亦是其中之一。(三)多數民眾認為警察的角色應該是「執法者」重於「服務者」,亦認為「法」「理」「情」是警察執行勤務時應該遵行的順序。(四)年齡、教育程度與職業類別與警察形象認知最具顯著關係。(五)根據上述調查結果,本研究提出若干行銷策略,以供實務界與學術界參考。
Police image in Taiwan is quite controversial. The aim of this research is to find the answer for the following related questions: How Taipei citizens perceive policy image? What are the sources of perception? How to market positive policy image based on the findings of perception structure. This research focuses on the strategies of image marketing for Taipei Police agency through the quantitative and qualitative methods. The author defines police image as three interrelated dimensions, i.e., institutional, functional, and behavioral image, and then elaborating eight categories, i.e., policy, confidence, contribution, trustworthiness, law-enforcing, service, moral standards, and brand image. Such originality has never been presented before in the police administration academic field. The author also held two focuses groups, participating by 12 undergraduate and graduate students from both Central Police University and National Taipei University, to construct a Police Image Attitude Scale (PIAS). The process to analyze the reliability and validity of PIAS is described below: 30 Taipei citizens are randomly selected to rate the PIAS, showing Cronbach’ Coefficient Alpha of 0.9481, which allows us to proceed the following formal survey. 770 random samples are randomly collected through the CATI system in the Research Center for Public Opinion and Election Studies, National Taipei University. Finally, Crobach’ Coefficient Alpha Reliability of 0.7279 reveals that the PIAS has reached satisfactory level to test the police image. With regard to the validity of the PIAS, the author employs Factor Analysis which shows an eigenvalue larger than 1.0, and a factor loading larger than 0.3 for each dimension of police image. 8 Mrs. Shu-hui Wang is working for National Police Administration, the Ministry of Interior. She got the Master degree of Public Administration from Department of Public Administration and Policy, National Taipei University. On the basis of investigating result by the PAIS, the author suggested image marketing strategies. This research concluded that two sets of marketing strategies are systematically described to promote the positive image of police: the institutional aspect of patrol and technical aspect of marketing. The completion of this study not only contributes the creation of the empirical study of PAIS, but also helps police agency to promote policy image.
期刊論文
1.Spector, J. H.(1961)。Basic Dimension of the Corporate Image。Journal of Marketing,25(6),47-56。  new window
2.馮惠德(19810900)。樹立警察正確形象之體認與建議。警學叢刊,12(1),37-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Dowling, G. R.(1986)。Managing Your Corporate Image。Industrial Marketing Management,15(2),109-115。  new window
4.Merrill, J. C.(1962)。The Image of the United States in Ten Mexican Dailies。Journalism Quarterly,39(2),203-209。  new window
5.Kotler, P.、Haider, D.、Rein, I.(1994)。There's No Place Like Our Place!。Public Management,76,15-21。  new window
6.Kotler, Philip、Barich, Howard(1991)。A Framework for Marketing Image Management。Sloan Management Review,32(2),94-104。  new window
7.黃尊秋(19810900)。警察人員參與開創中國人揚眉吐氣世紀應樹立的新形象。警學叢刊,12(1),2-4。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.何恩廷(19810900)。從民眾對警察的觀感談到樹立警察新形象。警學叢刊,12(1),5-6。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Nagashima, Akira(1970)。A Comparison of Japanese and U.S. Attitudes toward Foreign Products。Journal of Marketing,34(1),68-74。  new window
10.Reynolds, William H.(1965)。The role of the consumer in image building。California Management Review,7(3),69-76。  new window
會議論文
1.李宗勳(2002)。警察形象與社會資本的關聯與發展。中央警察大學警察形象行銷研討會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊培傑(1987)。在華外僑對我國警察之印象(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭昱宏(1998)。企業形象與經營績效關係之研究-以大台北地區銀行為例(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭俊雄(1992)。國內大型企業導入企業識別系統現況之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.沈游振(2002)。使用者形象對時尚品牌消費型態影響研究--以吉安尼.凡賽斯為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.廖翠華(2003)。整合行銷傳播在廣播電台行銷上之應用--亞洲電台個案研究(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭幸福(1999)。都市整體形象及行銷通路特性之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.馬群傑(1998)。以形象發展推動地區行銷之策略與案例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.林煥木(1985)。警察形象決定因素暨評估群體特性之研究--台北市實證分析(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.周鴻騰(2002)。社會行銷於政策決策過程中之應用--以推動購物用塑膠袋及免洗餐具限制使用政策為例(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.林崇陽(2002)。警察人員對警察品牌形象認知之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.台北大學民意與選舉研究中心(2002)。警察形象知多少?--台灣地區民眾對警察形象認知調查報告。台北:台北大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.心理學百科全書編輯委員會(1996)。心理學百科全書。杭州:浙江教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃俊英(1985)。行銷研究--管理與技術。台北:華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.內政部警政署(2003)。年終記者會署長講話參考資料。台北:警政署。  延伸查詢new window
5.Nimmo, D.、Savage, R. L.(1976)。Candidates and Their Images。California:Goodyear Publishing Co.。  new window
6.Whlsenand, M. P.(1973)。The Management of Police Organization。N. J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
7.Leonard, V. A.、More, W. H.(1974)。Police Organization And Management。The Foundation Press, Inc.。  new window
8.Manning, K. P.(1976)。Police Work: The Social Organization of Policing。Mass:MIT Press。  new window
9.Johnson, A. T.、Misner, E. G.、Brown, P. L.(1981)。The Police and Society。Englewood Cliff, N.J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc.。  new window
10.Cizanckas, I. V.(1977)。Modern Police Management and Organization。N.Y.:John Willey & Sons Inc.。  new window
11.楊永年(2002)。警察組織剖析。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳明傳(2002)。警察百科全書(六)行政警察。桃園:中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.東森民調中心(2001)。九十年警察滿意度調查報告。台北:東森民調中心。  延伸查詢new window
14.李美枝(1983)。社會心理學。台北:大西洋出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Walters, C. Glenn(1974)。Consumer Behavior: Theory and Practice。Richard D. Irwin Inc.。  new window
16.Kerper, B. H.(1979)。Introduction to the Criminal Justice System。Minnesota:West Publishing Co.。  new window
17.楊清(1985)。簡明心理學辭典。吉林:吉林人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.高希均(1985)。企業形象--良性循環的原動力。台北:天下文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
19.Assael, Henry(1987)。Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action。Boston, Massachusetts:PWS-KENT Publishing Company。  new window
20.黃俊英(2003)。行銷學的世界。台北:天下文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.Wilson, O. W.(1972)。Police Administration。New York:McGraw Hill-Book Co.。  new window
22.辭源修訂組(1990)。辭源。台北:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
23.Boulding, Kenneth E.(1956)。The image: knowledge in life and society。University of Michigan Press。  new window
24.Osgood, Charles Egerton、Suci, George John、Tannenbaum, Percy H.(1957)。The Measurement of Meaning。Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press。  new window
其他
1.張昭瑞(2002)。論警察形象形成與公眾評價機制。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top