:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國老年給付稅賦處理之探討
書刊名:臺灣社會福利學刊
作者:譚慧芳鄭清霞 引用關係
作者(外文):Tan, Hui-fangCheng, Ching Hsia
出版日期:2003
卷期:3
頁次:頁107-143
主題關鍵詞:老年給付退休金稅賦安排租稅優惠Old-age benefitPensionTax treatmentTax privileges
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:53
由於生育率下跌及平均餘命的延長導致公共年金的財務壓力,除了改變既有制度的內涵外,也有愈來愈多的國家從單一制度轉向多層的經濟保障制度。未來老年經濟保障將強調公、私混合的多元所得來源。世界各亦利用租優惠等方式鼓勵私人年金的發展。租稅優惠不僅牽涉到公平性問題,更重要地影響到稅式支出成本,以及稅式支出成效問題。老年給付可能在三個時間點被課稅,基金提撥或保費繳付、投資獲利、退休金給付。課稅理論基礎是所得稅或消費稅會影響其課稅時點的組合。本文主要目的在於探討老年給付課稅的理論基礎,同時檢視臺灣現行有關老年給付的課稅規定;最後對臺灣未來老年給付稅賦規劃是出建議。
Declining fertility rates and increasing life expectancy have exerted financial pressures on public pension system. Thus far, most countries have reacted by altering the parameters of their existing systems. But a growing number of countries have carried out major structural changes, shifting from single-pillar schemes to multiplier schemes. Governments in many developed economies encourage private pension plans by offering significant taxation incentives. Tax privilege of old-age benefits raises the issue of tax equity and the scale of tax expenditures—that is, the cost and effect of tax privileges. Old-age benefits may be taxed at three points, when money is contributed, when investment income is earned, and when retirement benefits are paid to scheme members. Different combinations of these give rest to taxation according to two alternative principles, the expenditure tax and the comprehensive income tax. In this article, we first discuss how old-age benefits should be taxed. Then, we review the current regulations of old-age benefits in Taiwan. And finally, we conclude with our observations and suggestions about tax treatment of old-age benefits.
期刊論文
1.Atkinson, M. E.、Creedy, J.、Knox, D. M.(1999)。Some implications of changing the tax basis for pension funds。Fiscal Studies,20(2),189-203。  new window
2.方明川(1994)。所得稅、遺產稅與年金保險。壽險專刊,94,19-46。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭清霞、趙清遠(2002)。個人年金保險與老年經濟安全規劃。台灣銀行季刊。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.鄭文輝(1997)。我國年金制度租稅優惠之探討。賦稅改革與財政政策研討會。台北:政治大學財政系。  延伸查詢new window
2.周國端(2000)。金融保險機構在退休制度中的功能研究。2000退休基金研討會會議,公務人員退休撫卹基金管理委員會、公務人員退休撫卹基金監理委員會、中華民國退休基金協會、中華民國證券投資信託暨顧問商業同業公會 。臺北市:公務人員退休撫卹基金。4-44。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭清霞(1999)。我國國民年金與職業年金之老年給付水準與費率規劃探討(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊淑珠(2000)。職業年金課稅問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.符寶玲(1999)。退休基金制度與管理。臺北:華泰書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Davis, E. P.(1995)。Pension Funds: Retirement-Income Security, and Capital Markets, an International Perspective。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
3.World Bank(1994)。Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.行政院勞工委員會(2002)。中華民國九十年台灣地區勞動統計年鑑。  延伸查詢new window
5.阮呂芳周、陳寶欽(2001)。稅務會計(含會計實務與稅法)。文笙書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hyman, David N.(1993)。Public Finance: Acontemporary Application of Theory of Policy Fourth edition。Dryden Press。  new window
7.Dilnot, Andrew、Paul, Johnson(1993)。The Taxation of Private Pensions。The Institute for fiscal Studies。  new window
8.Keating, P. J.(1988)。Reform of the Options for Taxing Superannuation。Sydncy:Australian Tax Research foundation。  new window
9.Rosen, Harvey S.(1999)。Public Finance。Singapore。  new window
10.Raby, William L.(1964)。The Income Tax and Business decisions。Prentiu-Hall Inc。  new window
其他
1.行政院勞工委員會(2003)。勞動統計。  延伸查詢new window
2.中央信託局(2003)。公務人員保險統計。  延伸查詢new window
3.壽險公會(2001)。壽險業89年業績。  延伸查詢new window
4.Cook, Malcolm,Paul, Johnson(2000)。Saving for Retirement: How Taxes and Charges Affect Choice,London:Financial Services Authority。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃介良、吳明儒(1993)。人口老化與財務規劃:多層次的老人經濟結構。社會安全問題之探討。嘉義:中正大學社會福利研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭文輝、吳明儒、陳琇惠、鄭清霞(1999)。台灣年金體制之解析--公、私部門之整合。台灣社會福利發展—回顧與展望。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Dilnot, A.(1992)。Taxation and private Pensions: Costs and Consequences。Private Pensions and Public Policy。Paris:OECD。  new window
4.Hubbard, Richard L.(1994)。The Tax Treatment of Pensions.。Pension Funding and Taxation: Impliciations for Tomorrow。Washington , DC.:EBRI。  new window
5.Munnell, A. H.(1988)。Comments on Andrews and Bradford’s Paper。Uneasy Compromise。Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top