資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.149.214.32)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Taiwan's Referendum Act and the Stability of the Status Quo
書刊名:
Issues & Studies
作者:
林繼文
作者(外文):
Lin, Jih-wen
出版日期:
2004
卷期:
40:2
頁次:
頁119-153
主題關鍵詞:
Referendum Act
;
Initiative and reconsideration
;
Defensive referendum
;
Plebiscite
;
2004 presidential election
;
Cross-Strait relations
;
Taiwan's democratization
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
5
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
5
共同引用:0
點閱:52
The international community has watched Taiwan's first referendum, held on March 20, 2004, with great concern, for fear that it would destabilize the relations across the Taiwan Strait. Less attention, however, has been given to the legal basis of this referendum. This article offers a thorough analysis of Taiwan's Referendum Act and discusses its effects on the status quo which is defined as the situation before any referendum is held. The article distinguishes among various types of referendum institutions, and demonstrates that many articles in the Act actually add more veto-playing forces to the existing political system and thus raises the cost for the status quo to be changed. These impacts on the status quo are diminished, however, by the high passage threshold. Based on this analysis, a concluding section projects the possible ways in which the Act can be revised.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Frey, Bruno S.、Stutzer, Alois(2000)。Happiness, Economy and Institutions。The Economic Journal,110(466),918-938。
2.
McKelvey, Richard D.(1976)。Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some implications for Agenda Control。Journal of economic Theory,12(3),472-482。
3.
Swaine, Michael D.(20040300)。Trouble in Taiwan。Foreign Affairs,83(2),39-49。
4.
Christin, Thomas、Hug, Simon(2002)。Referendums and Citizen Support for European Integration。Comparative Political Studies,35(5),586-618。
5.
Clark, Sherman J.(1998)。A Populist Critique of Direct Democracy。Harvard Law Review,112(2),434-482。
6.
Clarke, Harold D.、Kornberg, Allan、Stewart, Marianne C.(2004)。Referendum Voting as Political Choice: The Case of Quebec。British Journal of Political Science,34(2),345-356。
7.
Lacy, Dean、Niou, Emerson M. S.(2000)。A Problem with Referendums。Journal of Theoretical Politics,2,5-3。
8.
Vowles, Jack(1995)。The Politics of Electoral Reform in New Zealand。International Political Science Review,16(1),95-115。
9.
Lin, J. W.(2002)。Transition Through Transaction: Taiwan's Constitutional Reforms in the Lee Teng-Hui Era。American Asian Review,20(2),123-155。
研究報告
1.
Kaufmann, Bruno、Goldmann, Mattias(20040405)。Taiwan 2004 Referendum Assessment Report。The Initiative & Referendum Institution Europe。
圖書
1.
Suksi, Markku(1993)。Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum。Martinus Nijhoff。
2.
Auer, Andreas、Bützer, Michael(2001)。Direct Democracy: The Eastern and Central European Experience。Burlington, VT:Aldershot, Hants:Ashgate。
3.
Cronin, Thomas E.(1989)。Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。
4.
Walker, Mark Clarence(2003)。The Strategic Use of Referendums: Power, Legitimacy, and Democracy。New York:Palgrave:Macmillan。
5.
Butler, David、Ranney, Austin(1997)。Referendums Around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy。New York:Palgrave:Macmillan。
6.
Gallagher, Michael、Uleri, Pier Vincenzo(1996)。The Referendum Experience in Europe。New York:St. Martin's Press。
7.
Ordeshook, Peter C.(1986)。Game Theory and Political Theory。Cambridge University Press。
8.
Tsebelis, George(2002)。Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work。Princeton University Press。
9.
Lijphart, Arend(1984)。Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries。Yale University Press。
圖書論文
1.
Anderson, Gary M.(1999)。Electoral Limits。Limiting Leviathan。Cheltenham:Edward Elgar。
2.
Balsom, Denis(1996)。The United Kingdom: Constitutional Pragmatism and the Adoption of the Referendum。The Referendum Experience in Europe。Hampshire:Macmillan Press。
3.
Tien, Hung-mao(1997)。Taiwan's Transformation。Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies。Baltimore, MD:London:Johns Hopkins University Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
臺灣防衛性公投與美國對臺政策調整
2.
從臺灣的公投、新憲議題看美國小布希政府的兩岸政策調整
3.
The Paradox of the National Identity Issue in Chen Shui-bian's 2004 Presdential Campaign: Base Constituencies vs. the Moderate Middle
4.
Beyond the Blue-Green Tango: Social Movement vs. National Security in the 320 Referendum Dispute
5.
Explaining Referendum Voting Choices in Taiwan
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code