:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:孫吳「彈性外交」述論
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:謝偉傑
作者(外文):Tse, Wicky Wai Ki
出版日期:2004
卷期:22:1=44
頁次:頁21-46
主題關鍵詞:三國孫吳孫權正統彈性外交Three kingdomsWu kingdomSun ChuanLegitimacyElastic diplomacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:72
歷來討論魏、蜀、吳三國關係的論著多著眼於蜀、吳聯合抗魏。本文嘗試以吳國為本位,分析孫吳政權 (西元200-280年) 如何在當時的「國際」環境下,透過推行「彈性外交」以求取生存空間。所謂「彈性外交」是指孫吳並不囿於固定路線,伺機而動的一種外交策略。孫吳得以施行「彈性外交」的原因可以從兩方面分析。一、「國際秩序」的結構性因素:即1.魏國一時不能滅吳,對吳國的反覆無可如何;2.蜀漢既無力滅魏,又需要吳國作為盟友,只好作出容讓;3.吳國缺乏進行統一的正統論基礎,弊處在於與魏、蜀相比時不能提出鮮明的正統理論,需要依違其間,好處卻在於吳國因而缺少了正統論的包袱,可以隨利益而改變立場。二、國內政治因素,即1.吳國長期受山越困擾,需要安定內部;2.吳國發展出「保江東、觀成敗」的立國觀念,在保守江東的基礎上,為生存、發展可因應時勢而改變外交立場。
This paper argues that the kingdom of Wu (200-280) adopted a unique diplomatic strategy, which the author refers to as “elastic diplomacy,” to survive. This strategy stresses having the flexibility to respond to changing circumstances and exploit available opportunities. In practice, the Wu would act as a client state of the Wei dynasty (220-265) or an ally of the Shu Han state (221-264), depending on its own interests. This paper traces the implementation of this strategy and concludes that its efficacy was influenced by several external and domestic political factors. The Wei and the Shu were long-time rivals that competed for the cooperation of the Wu and the right to lay claim to being the legitimate successor to the Han dynasty. The Wu, on the other hand, devoted all of its resources to suppressing the mountainous Yue people and were continually affected by the policy of flexibility formulated by Sun Ce (孫策 184-200), the founder of the regime.
期刊論文
1.王素、宋少華、羅新(1999)。長沙走馬樓簡牘整理的新收穫。文物,1999(5),26-44。  延伸查詢new window
2.王素、宋少華、羅新(1989)。蜀吳夷陵之戰後議和史事考。四川大學學報:哲學社會科學版,1989(4),110-111。  延伸查詢new window
3.景有泉(1996)。三國鼎立局面形成問題研究綜述。中國史研究動態,1996(5),8-11。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳學霖(1984)。Legitimation in Imperial China:Discussions under the Jurchen-Chin Dynasty (1115–1234)。Seattle:University of Washington Press。  new window
2.Walker, Richard Louis(1953)。The Multi-state System of Ancient China。The Multi-state System of Ancient China。Hamden Conn.。  new window
3.許嵩原、張忱石(1986)。建康實錄。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.饒勝文(2002)。佈局天下:中國古代軍事地理大勢。佈局天下:中國古代軍事地理大勢。北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.Camilleri, Joseph A.、Falk, Jim(1992)。The End of Sovereignty?: the Politics of A Shrinking and Fragmenting World。Brookfield, Vt。  new window
6.陳壽、裴松之、陳乃乾(1982)。三國志。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉伯驥(1962)。春秋會盟政治。台北:中華叢書編審委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.方詩銘(2000)。三國人物散論。三國人物散論。上海。  延伸查詢new window
9.田餘慶(1993)。漢魏之際的青徐豪霸。秦漢魏晉史探微。北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.田餘慶(1993)。孫吳建國的道路。秦漢魏晉史探微。北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.李培棟(1996)。六朝國策異同論。魏晉南北朝史緣。上海。  延伸查詢new window
12.凱米萊爾.約瑟夫.A.、福克爾.吉米(2001)。主權的終結?─日趨「縮小」和「碎片化」的世界政治。主權的終結?─日趨「縮小」和「碎片化」的世界政治。杭州。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳學霖(1993)。歐陽修正統論新釋。宋史論集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.傅樂成(1995)。孫吳與山越之開發。漢唐史論集。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Kazhdan, Alexander(1992)。The Notion of Byzantine Diplomacy。Byzantine Diplomacy AD 800-1204。Hampshire。  new window
16.Leban, Carl(1978)。Managing Heaven’s Mandate: Coded Communication in the Accession of Ts’ao P’i, A. D. 220。Ancient China: Studies in Early Civilization。Hong Kong。  new window
17.陶晉生(1988)。Two Sons of Heaven: Studies in Sung-Liao Relations。Two Sons of Heaven: Studies in Sung-Liao Relations。Tucson。  new window
18.Worthy, Edmund H. Jr.(1983)。Diplomacy for Survival: Domestic and Foreign Relations of Wu Y’eh, 907-978。China among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th-14th Centuries。Berkeley。  new window
其他
1.(唐)房玄齡(1998)。晉書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.傅樂成(1981)。荊州與六朝政局。漢唐史論集。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
2.唐長孺(1955)。孫吳建國及漢末江南的宗部與山越。魏晉南北朝史論叢。北京:三聯書店:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.西嶋定生(1983)。親魏倭王冊封に至る東アジアの情勢。中國古代國家と東アジア世界。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
4.范家偉(1998)。三國正統論與陳壽對天文星占材料的處理--兼論壽書無「志」。結網編。臺北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top