:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跳馬項目不同起評分與實施減分對競賽成績影響之分析
書刊名:文化體育學刊
作者:陳嘉遠 引用關係張至滿
作者(外文):Chen, Jia YeanChang Chih Man
出版日期:2004
卷期:2
頁次:頁285-298
主題關鍵詞:競技體操跳馬項目起評分實施減分最後得分Artistic gymnasticsHorse vaultingStart valuesDeduction scoreFinal score
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:41
本研究目的在應用競賽優勢理論,透過統計分析方法,探討在2003年韓國大邱世界大學運動會體操錦標賽,瞭解24國90位男子選手於跳馬項目,其致勝因素:「難、新、穩、美」等對競賽之演出成績影響;具體目的在於了解B組4位裁判員評定90位選手成績之:1)信度、效度與客觀性;2)起評分、實施減分、動作類別、著地穩定與最後得分的集中趨勢情形。以經以描述統計集中趨勢與單因子變異數分析,其結果顯示如下:1.起評分與實施減分均具有信度效度與客性,裁判評分一致性高。2.致勝因素:「難、新、穩、美」對成績之影響發之現象如下:①起評分(難):有發展難度追求高起評分之現象。②動作分類(新):第3、4與5類之動作,均可獲高分。第3、4類組的動作具多元性、第5類組的動作具有稀少性,其變化空間較容易開發獨特性。③實施減分(美):選手一半以上維持競技體操之基本精神「不以犧牲完美之姿勢來完成高難度之動作技術。」④著地穩定程度(穩):實施上有重大失誤之著地減分超0.50分以下較成功著地者52人佔(57.8%),顯示出重大失誤比率較偏高現象。
This study purpose is to use the advantage theory of the contest, through the analytical method of statistic, probe into 2003 Korea’s Daegui Gymnastics Championship in Universiade, find out about 90 gymnasts of 24 countries in the horse-vaulting, factor that it wins victory: ‘Difficulty, Originality, Insurance, Elegance’, etc. to influence the performance of the competition; It lie in concrete purpose that understand B group of 4 judges scoring on the: 1) Reliability, Validity and Objectivity; 2) measures of central location about start values, deduction score, vault groups, landing stabile and final score. After through statistical analysis with measures of central location, one way ANOVA, its result shows as follows: 1) start values and deduction score both have reliability, validity and objectivity, that is the judges evaluation higher to consistence. 2) Factors that it wins victory: ‘Difficulty, Originality, Insurance, Elegance’, etc. to influence the performance of the competition were as follows phenomenon:① Start value (Difficulty): Degree of difficulty of development purses the phenomenon marked high.② Vault groups (Originality): The third, 4th and 5th Vault Groups are can obtain the high score. ③ Deduction score (Elegance): Gymnast’s over half maintains the basic spirit of the Artistic Gymnastics that do not finish vault group of highly difficult technology by expense of the perfect posture. ④ Landing presentation (Insurance): Demonstrate great fault rate than the phenomenon on the high side.
期刊論文
1.趙洪明(2002)。對競技體操致勝律的再認識。南京體育學院學報,1(6),131-134。  延伸查詢new window
2.張涵勁(2001)。從2000第27屆奧運會體操比賽看世界男子跳馬發展趨勢。中國體育科技,37(5),43-45。  延伸查詢new window
3.祝振軍(2001)。世界優秀男子跳馬選手技術統計與分析。天律體育學院學報,16(3),72。  延伸查詢new window
4.姚吉慶(2003)。論競技體操跳馬落地技術穩定性。武漢體育學院學報,37(3),33-35。  延伸查詢new window
5.李樹林(2001)。試論競技體操美的本質。山東體育科技,23(1),51-53。  延伸查詢new window
6.李長儉、丁元英(2000)。競技體操動作技術創新理論探析。山東體育科技,22(1),11-14。  延伸查詢new window
7.李思民(2000)。世界男子競技體操運動的發展現狀與對策。天津體育學院學報,15(2),66-68。  延伸查詢new window
8.李文記(2000)。試論競技體操難與美的辯證統一。山東體育科技,22(4),20-22。  延伸查詢new window
9.吳維銘(2002)。第21屆世界大學生運動會男子體操跳馬比賽調研報告。西安體育學院學報,19(4),57-59。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蔡恆政(2003)。國際男子競技體操裁判員評分準確性之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.崔鳴周(1992)。體操訓練學部分問題探微。北京:人民體育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.F. I. G.(2001)。Code of Points For Men'€™s Artistic Gymnastics。  new window
3.謝亞龍、王汝英(1992)。中國優勢競技項目致勝規律。北京:人民體育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳鎭華(1990)。中國體操運動史。武漢:武漢出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.林清山(1997)。心理與教育統計學。臺北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE