:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣與國際優秀吊環項目選手表現之比較
書刊名:體育學報
作者:陳光輝 引用關係陳智郁湯文慈 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Kuang-huiChen, Chin-yuTang, Wen-tzu
出版日期:2012
卷期:45:4
頁次:頁347-357
主題關鍵詞:競技體操組群分值有效動作分值實施扣分最後得分Artistic gymnasticsGroup scoreEffective scoreDeduction scoreFinal score
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:685
  • 點閱點閱:92
目的:比較臺灣與國際優秀選手在吊環項目表現的差異,進一步了解現階段臺灣選手極需克服的專項訓練問題為何。方法:以參加全運會、世錦賽、亞運會及世大運吊環決賽選手共32人次為研究對象,運用相依樣本t檢定比較預賽與決賽分值;χ^2百分比同質性考驗各個組群動作次數百分比;以相依樣本單因子變異數分析檢驗有效動作分值、組群分值、實施得分、最後得分及各組群動作分值,當上述檢驗變項的F值達顯著水準時,再以LSD法進行事後比較,本研究顯著水準皆定為α= .05。結果:一、臺灣選手的預賽與決賽分值達顯著差異;二、世錦賽及世大運選手在組群分值、實施得分與最後得分等三個部份皆高於臺灣選手;三、四種賽會選手在各組群動作次數表現皆未達顯著差異;四、選手皆以第Ⅲ、Ⅳ組群動作為主,組群動作分值為最高。結論:臺灣選手在大迴環動作的穩定性及力量動作體勢的標準化需力求改善,發展高難度動作技術及提昇結束動作至D級難度則是另一項訓練重點;在整套動作內容部份,臺灣選手與國際優秀選手動作表現皆以展現力量動作為主體。
Purpose: This study was to compare Taiwan's top level and international elite gymnasts participating rings event. To understand where our gymnasts need to active overcome in training. Methods: The subjects were 32 gymnasts who qualified for men's apparatus final of 2010 World Championship, 2010 Asia Game, 2011 University Game and 2011 National Game for the rings competition. The dependent samples t-test was used to examine the scare values of qualification and final, and each element group in the routine was tested through χ^2 test of homogeneity of proportions, and the One-way ANONA was used to examine the effective score, group score, deduction score, final score and element groups of values. If significant difference existed, we then used LSD methods for the post-hoc test. Significant level was set at α=.05. Results: The Taiwan gymnasts' qualification and final score values showed significant difference. In terms of group score, deduction score and final score, the 2010 world competition and 2011 University Game group's performance were all significantly better than Taiwan gymnasts. The element group percentages showed no significant difference. In this study we found that the element group performed the most, as well as those that gather the most scores, belonged largely to the III and IV group. Conclusion: Taiwanese gymnasts should focus on technical stability and preciseness. Moreover, should practice higher difficulty skills, and dismounts must achieve grades up to D value. In routine performances, Taiwan and international groups showed resemblance, and strength is still the main structure of the rings event.
期刊論文
1.周日智(2010)。新奧運周期中國男子優秀體操運動員動作的發展。體育學刊,17(5),77-83。  延伸查詢new window
2.歐文勤、黃玉斌、張云貴、彭庆元(1993)。中國體操男隊力量素質的訓練特徵探討。中國體育科技,29(3),17-21。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡亨(20070800)。國際男子競技體操評分規則演進。大專體育,91,140-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳光輝、王明鴈、蔡亨(20051200)。2002亞運會及2003全運會男子競技體操選手整套動作之實施扣分比較分析。國立體育學院論叢,16(3),283-292。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳光輝、鄭黎暉、陳銘堯(20080900)。我國男子競技體操吊環項目的動作發展、成績回顧及未來展望之探討--1990-2007。中華體育季刊,22(3)=86,83-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳光輝、湯文慈(2009)。我國男子競技體操國際賽成績統計與獲獎內容探討--1990~2008。大專體育,103,72-78。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳光輝、何維華(20050900)。吊環團身後空翻三周下環動作技術之個案分析:以林耀輝選手為例。大專體育學刊,7(3),273-285。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bernasconi, S.、Parratte, B.、Rouillon, J.-D.、Monnier, G.、Tordi, N.(2006)。Effect of two devices on the surface electromyography responses of eleven shoulder muscles during Azarian in gymnastics。Journal of strength and conditioning research,20(1),53-57。  new window
9.Prassas, S.、Kwon, Y. H.、Sands, W. A.(2006)。Biomechanical research in artistic gymnastics: A review。Sports Biomechanics,5(2),261-291。  new window
10.陳光輝、陳漢棟、蔡亨(20070300)。男子競技體操吊環項目力量動作之保護方法探討。國立體育學院論叢,18(1),95-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.俞智贏(19981200)。男子體操加分技能及成績分析--86年臺灣區運動會體操賽男子第Ⅲ競賽。體育學報,26,105-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳光輝、湯文慈、蔡亨(20100300)。從組群概念比較我國全運會與奧運會男子競技體操選手整套動作內容之差異。體育學報,43(1),89-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳光輝、陳銘堯(20081200)。由2005、2007年世大運成績看我國大專男子競技體操發展現況。大專體育,99,85-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳光輝、王明鴈、陳銘堯(20081200)。影響男子競技體操評分規則中A、B分高低的主要因素探討。中華體育季刊,22(4)=87,119-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳光輝、陳智郁(20120300)。從組群概念分析國際優秀吊環選手的整套動作內容。中華體育季刊,26(1)=100,139-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳嘉遠、張至滿(20050600)。男子競技體操優勢策略致勝規律研究:吊環項目難、美優先順序規律對競賽成績影響差異分析。大專體育學刊,7(2),169-185。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳嘉遠、張至滿(20050900)。吊環競賽不同起評分與實施減分對成績影響之研究。大專體育學刊,7(3),229-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.周曰智、紹斌(2009)。第29屆奧運會男子體操單項決賽動作分析。體育學刊,16(2),85-90。  延伸查詢new window
19.俞智贏(2006)。從2005東亞運男子體操賽探討2008奧運奪牌策略。國民體育季刊,35(3),51-56。  延伸查詢new window
20.許樹淵(1991)。1991年世界體操錦標賽選手選拔監選報告。體育與運動,74,25-29。  延伸查詢new window
21.許樹淵(1995)。體操協會參加1994年亞運會培訓選手選拔監選報告。體育與運動,91,25-27。  延伸查詢new window
22.陳嘉遠(2011)。體操參加亞洲運動會之回顧與展望。國民體育季刊,40(1),61-67。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳光輝、柯文佳、湯文慈(2011)。不同競技水準男子競技體操選手分値表現的比較。體育學報,43(4),623-638。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.韓華(2005)。世界男子吊環成套動作編排特徵與發展趨向研究。天津體育學院學報,20(2),24-26。  延伸查詢new window
25.Bernasconi, .S、Tordi, N.、Parratte, B.、Rouillon, J-D.、Monnier, G.(2004)。Surface electromyography of shoulder muscles in two iron cross conditions in gymnastics。The Journal o f Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness,44(3),240-245。  new window
26.Bernasconi, S.、Tordi, N.、Parratte, B.、Rouillon, J-D.(2009)。Can shoulder muscle coordination during the support scale at ring height be replicated during training exercises in gymnastics?。Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,23(8),2381-2388。  new window
27.Sprigings, J.、Lanovaz, L.、Watson, L.、Russell, W.(1998)。Removing swing from a handstand on rings using a properly timed backward giant circle: A simulation solution。Journal of Biomechanics,31,27-35。  new window
圖書
1.Federation International de Gymnastique(2009)。The Code of Points for Men'€™s Artistic Gymnastics。Germany:Federation International de Gymnastique。  new window
2.鄭吾真、陸保鐘(1990)。競技體操訓練學。北京市:北京體育學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園(1978)。社會及行為科學研究法。東華書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Federation International de Gymnastique(2006)。The code of points for men's artistic gymnastics。Switzerland:Federation International de Gymnastique。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE