本研究的目的，旨在探討行政院體育委員會核定2004年雅典奧運女子跆拳道第一量級精英培訓選手（甲）與重點培訓選手（乙），於2003年德國世界跆拳道錦標賽暨奧運培訓選拔賽中攻擊型態分析與比較。以瞭解奧運女子第一量級培訓特優選手於此賽中攻擊型態，提供奧運培訓教練與選手於訓練及比賽的參考。本研究利用錄影帶系統觀察法加以記錄統整，將處理後的資訊進行量化分析，並針對攻擊型態中主動與被動、左腳與右腳及對戰時前腳與後腳搭配攻擊的攻擊數、得分數及得分成功率，以平均數及次數百分比進行綜合描述，其研究結果為：甲選手平均每場攻擊數為36.88高於乙選手的28.75，平均每場得分數甲選手的3.50低於乙選手的4.50，而得分成功率甲選手9.49％低於乙選手的15.65％。主動與被動、右腳與左腳及對戰時的前腳與後腳攻擊數與效果：甲選手，在攻擊時以主動左後腳平均每場攻擊數11.50（31.19％）最高，被動右前腳1.25（3.39％）最低。在得分效果以主動右後腳平均每場得分數0.88（25.00％）最高，主動右前腳為0最低。在得分成功率方面以被動右前腳攻擊的30.00％最高，主動右前腳0最低。乙選手，在攻擊時以主動右前腳平均每場攻擊數6.50（22.61％）最高，被動左前腳0.75（2.61％）最低。在得分數效果以主動右前腳平均每場得ο分數1.25（27.78％）最高，主動左前腳與被動左前腳均為0最低。在得分成功率以被動右後腳攻擊的40.00％最高，主動左前腳與被動左前腳均為0最低。由以上結果經討論分析後所得結論，可瞭解本次比賽中甲、乙二位選手在攻擊數及得分成功率上主動攻擊均高於被動攻擊，是屬於主動攻擊型選手。在慣用攻擊型態中，甲選手著重於主動左後腳攻擊，得分動作型態以主動右後腳為主，而乙選手著重主動右前腳攻擊，得分攻擊型態也以主動右前腳為主，在攻擊效果得分成功率的比較上，乙選手的15.65％明顯高於甲選手9.49％。為提昇國際競爭實力，二位選手被動反攻擊能力均須補強訓練，以符世界跆拳道聯盟最新實施競賽規則的立體化強力跆拳道的競賽趨勢。

The purpose of this study was to discuss the analysis and comparison of attack styles before competition to female golden medalists of fin weight division, bunch-developed player (A) and point-developed player (B) in 2003 World Taekwondo championship. It provided as a reference to the coaches and players the attack styles of female golden medalists of fin weight. This study used the video observational system to record attack techniques. Mean and frequency percentage analysis described the attack, counts, score counts and successful rate by the attack of active and passive, left foot and right foot, front foot and rear foot. The results were that the attack count of the A player was 36.88, and it’s higher than the B player whose attack count was 28.75. The A player’s score was 3.50 which was lower than the B player’s 28.75. And the successful rate of A player was 9.49% which was lower than the B player’s 15.65%. As for the attack count and effect of each race of active and passive, left foot and right foot, front foot and rear foot, the A player got the highest attack count of 11.50 (31.19%) by active left rear foot attack, and the lowest one was 1.25 (3.39%) by passive right rear foot attack, and the lowest one was 0 by active right front foot attack. Four the score successful rate, the highest was 30.00% by passive right foot attack, and the lowest was 0 by active right front foot attack. The B player got the highest attack count of 6.50 (22.61%) by active right front foot attack, and the lowest was 0.75 (2.61) by passive left front foot attack. For the score effect, the highest was 1.25 (27.78%)by active right front foot attack, and the lowest was 0 by active left front foot attack and passive left front foot attack. The conclusion was that both A and B players got higher active attack than the passive one for the attack count and score successful rate, in other words, they belonged to the active attack players. For the common attack style, the A player focused on active left rear foot attack and the score action style was mainly active right rear foot attack. While the B player focused on active right front foot attack, and the score attack style was mostly by active right front foot attack. For the comparison of score successful rate, the B player’s 15.65% was obviously higher than the A player’s 9.49%. In order to raise the ability of international competition, the two players needed to practice passive back-attack ability more. In this way, it could correspond to the new rules of competition trend of World Taekwondo Championship.