資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.220.191.247)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
自由與安全--美國的歷史經驗
書刊名:
臺灣民主季刊
作者:
嚴震生
作者(外文):
Yen, J. Chen-shen
出版日期:
2004
卷期:
1:3
頁次:
頁49-72
主題關鍵詞:
公民自由
;
國家安全
;
多元社會
;
種族定性
;
Civil liberties
;
National security
;
Pluralistic society
;
Racial profile
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:23
國人自由與國家安全雖然並非相互排斥,但不可否認地在戰時或緊急狀況時,政府會以國家安全為由,限制或剝奪個人在平時所享有、並視為理所當然的公民自由。即使在長期施行民主政治、特別強調尊重人權的美國,基於國家安全的考量而讓個人自由受到妥協或侵犯的情形,亦經常出現在其歷史中。隨著美國社會的多元化,和公民自由意識的提升,即使是在九一一恐怖攻擊事件後,美國司法單位亦無法以國家安全為由,而為所欲為地限制個人公民自由。
以文找文
Individual liberty and national security are not mutually exclusive concepts. However, during wartimes or emergencies, with national security as primary concern, government tends to limit or deprive individual civil liberties that have been enjoyed and taken for granted during peace time. Even for a country like the United States that has been an established democracy and which places special emphasis on respecting human rights, cases of compromising and infringing of individual liberties in the name of national security continue to surface in its history. With an evolving pluralistic society and greater consciousness of civil liberties, the law enforcing agencies in the United States, even in the aftermath of the terrorist attack of September 11, can no longer curtail civil liberties at will.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
嚴震生(19960600)。美國憲法對「免於自證其罪」的保障:「米蘭達權利」的爭議。美歐月刊,11(6)=122,120-141。
延伸查詢
2.
Braber, Liam(2002)。Korematsu's Ghost: A Post-September 11th Analysis of Race and National Security。Villanova Law Review,47(2),451-490。
3.
Davidson, Deirdre(2001)。Greater Leverage for INS Causes Some Concern。San Francisco Recorder,28,3。
4.
Galloway, Heath H.(2002)。Don't Forget What We're Fighting For: Will the Fourth Amendment Be a Casualty of the War on Terrorism?。Washington and Lee Law Review,59(3),921-974。
5.
Herzog, Micah(2002)。Is Korematsu Good Law in the Face of Terrorism? Procedural Due Process in the Security Versus Liberty Debate。Georgetown Immigration Low Journal,16(3),685-703。
6.
Holt, Pat M.(2002)。Will We Win the War, But Lose Our Freedom。Christian Science Monitor,2,9。
7.
Lin, Elbert(2003)。Korematsu Continued。Yale Law Journal,112(7),1911-1918。
8.
Palmer, Elizabeth A.(2001)。Terrorism Bill's Sparse Paper Trail May Cause Legal Vulnerabilities。Congressional Quarterly Weekly,27,2533。
9.
Rothschild, Matthew(2002)。The New McCarthyism。The Progressive,1,18。
10.
Tushnet, Mark(2003)。Defending Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime。Wisconsin Law Review,2,273-308。
11.
Cole, David(2003)。The New McCarthyism: Repeating History in the War on Terrorism。Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review,38(1),1-30。
12.
嚴震生(19960300)。由美國憲法判例看新聞自由、誹謗、及隱私權的爭議。美歐月刊,11(3)=119,106-124。
延伸查詢
13.
嚴震生(19961000)。免於無理的拘捕、搜索與扣押: 美國憲法第四條修正案之探討。美歐月刊,11(10)=126,72-94。
延伸查詢
會議論文
1.
嚴震生(2002)。Civil Liberties Issues in the Aftermath of the September 11th Terrorist Attacks。The International Conference on Change of US Government and Policy after September 11th Attacks,Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica (會議日期: 2002/12/4-12/5)。
圖書
1.
嚴震生(1998)。美國最高法院與宗教自由:「禁止設置條款」與「自由行使條款」的爭議。台北:志一。
延伸查詢
2.
Barkan, Elazar(2000)。The Guilt of Nations。New York:Norton。
3.
Brown, Cynthia(2003)。Lost Liberties: Ashcroft and the Assault on Personal Freedom。New York:London:The New Press。
4.
Chang, Nancy、Zinn, Howard(2002)。Silencing the Dissent: How Post-September 11 Antiterrorism Measures Threaten Our Civil Liberties。New York:Seven Stories Press。
5.
Cole, David、Dempsey, James X.(2002)。Terrorism and the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security。New York:The New Press。
6.
Freeman, Michael(2003)。Freedom or Security: The Consequences for Democracy Using Emergency Powers to Fight Terror。Westport, Connecticut:London:Praegers。
7.
Goldberg, Danny、Goldberg, Victor、Greenwald, Robert、Garofalo, Janeane(2003)。It's a Free Country: Personal Freedom in America after September 11。Thunder's Mouth Press/Nation Books。
8.
International Bar Association's Task Force on International Terrorism(2003)。International Terrorism: Legal Challenges and Responses。Ardsley, New York:Transnational Publishers, Inc.。
9.
Irons, Peter H.(1984)。Justice at War: The Story of the Japanese-American Internment Cases。New York:Oxford University Press。
10.
Irons, Peter H.(1989)。Justice Delayed: The Records of the Japanese-American Internment Cases。Middletown, CT:Wesleyan University Press。
11.
Lawson, Elizabeth(1952)。The Reign of Witches: The Struggle Against the Alien and Sedition Laws。New York:Civil Right Congress。
12.
Leone, Richard C.、Arnig, Greg, Jr.(2003)。The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism。New York:The Century Foundation。
13.
Neely, Mark E., Jr.(1991)。The Fate of Liberty: Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties。New York:Oxford University Press。
14.
Peltson, J. W.(1994)。Corwin & Peltason's Understanding the Constitution。Fort Worth, Texas:Harcourt Brace。
15.
Rehnquist, William(1998)。All the Laws But One: Civil Liberties in Wartime。New York:Knopf。
16.
Smith, James Morton(1956)。Freedom's Fetters: The Alien and Sedition Laws and American Civil Liberties。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。
17.
United States Commission on Wartime Relocation、Internment of Civilians(1983)。Personal Justice Denied。Washington, D. C.:United States Government Printing Office。
18.
Yamamoto, Eric, K.、Chon, Margaret、Izumi, Carol L.、Kang, Jerry、Wu, Frank H.(2001)。Race, Rights, and Reparation: Law and the Japanese-American Internment。Gaithersburg, Maryland:Aspen。
19.
Caute, David(1978)。The Great Fear: The Anti-Communist Purge Under Truman and Eisenhower。New York:Simon and Schuster。
20.
Miller, John C.(1951)。Crisis in Freedom: The Alien and Sedition Acts。Boston:Little, Brown。
其他
1.
Brennan, William J., Jr.(1987)。The Quest to Develop a Jurisprudence of Civil Liberties in Time of Security Crisis,Jerusalem:Law School of Hebrew University。,http://www.brennancenter.org/resources/downloads/nation_security_bren-nan.pdf, 2004/08/02。
2.
Krim, Jonathan(20010918)。Anti-Terror Push Stirs Fears for Liberties: Rights Groups United to Seek Safeguards。
3.
Siggins, Peter(2004)。Racial Profiling in an Age of Terrorism,Santa Clara。,http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/ethicalperspectives/profiling.html, 2004/08/02。
圖書論文
1.
Cloud, Stanley(2003)。The Fog of War: Covering the War on Terrorism。The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism。New York:Public Affairs。
2.
Whitaker, Reg(2003)。After 9/11: A Surveillance State?。Lost Liberties: Ashcroft and the Assault on Personal Freedom。New York:London:The New Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
評David Cole and James X. Dempsey, «Terrorism and the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security»[恐怖主義與憲法:以國家安全之名犧牲公民自由]
1.
台商在兩岸的流動與認同:經驗研究與政策分析
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code