:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:宋元墓誌中的「妾」在家庭中的意義及其歷史變化
書刊名:東吳歷史學報
作者:柏文莉
作者(外文):Bossler, Beverly
出版日期:2004
卷期:12
頁次:頁95-128
主題關鍵詞:宋元墓誌銘Song and YuanFunerary inscriptionsConcubine
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:166
本文考察宋元墓誌中有關「妾」(也包括側室、姬侍等)在家庭中位置的看法之轉變。首先可以發現,多種身分類型的女性—從婢女、娛樂表演者,到如夫人,都被稱為「妾」。而自宋元以降,不但現存墓誌中提到「妾」字的比率持續地增加,同時,妾在社會生活中也逐漸受到尊重。特別是在南宋到元的墓誌行文中,身為母親的妾開始出現在兒子或媳婦的墓誌內,以展現他們的孝行。到晚宋,妾則是因為她是墓主子嗣的母親,而得以出現在主人的墓誌中。身為母親的妾之所以受到注意,是因為墓誌作者開始注意到庶生子在家中所受的待遇。共同繼承(Equal inheritance)的理想越來越受重視,雖然在現實中這樣的理想經常被忽視。在這類有關妾和她們孩子的墓誌書寫中,明清時代的「大家庭」思想已經浮現。本文最後指出,墓誌銘的書寫固然反映出要讓妾進入家庭的想法,但這樣的想法從來都不曾徹底地實現。宋元社會的特質原在於其社會階層間的流動性和士大夫菁英之間激烈的競爭,妾制所能提供的那種靈活性恰為家族帶來了所需要的競爭優勢。墓誌書寫試圖掩飾這種靈活性,但這正是妾制在這個新社會環境中所能發揮作用的地方。
This article traces changing attitudes toward concubines across the Song and Yuan periods by examining how concubines are discussed in the genre of funerary inscriptions. It shows that the term “concubine” as used in the Song and Yuan encompassed women of many different statuses, from servant, to entertainer, to quasi-wife. It also shows that references, from servant, to entertainer, to quasi-wife. It also shows that references to concubines in funerary inscriptions across this period were becoming both more frequent and more respectful than in earlier eras. In particular, concubine mothers appear with increasingly frequency in funerary inscriptions of the Southern Song and Yuan. First appearing in the funerary biographies of their sons and daughters-in-law (where they serve as a vehicle for demonstrating the filial affections of the subject), in the late Song concubines begin to be acknowledge in the funerary biographies of their husbands, as mother of his children. The new attention to concubine mothers is matched by new attention to the disposition of the their children: the ideal of equal inheritance for all children is articulated with increasing force, even as the texts reveal that this ideal was often ignored in practice. In this new rhetoric about concubines and their children, we see reflections of the emerging ideal of family and lineage solidarity that was to characterize Chinese society in the late imperial period. The article concludes by suggesting that, in spite of funerary inscriptions’ rhetoric of “domestication,” the integration of concubines into family life was necessarily partial and tenuous. In Song and Yuan society, a society marked by fluidity of social status and intense competition among the elite, the flexibility provided by concubinage gave families an important competitive edge. Inscription rhetoric worked to disguise the very flexibility that made concubinage useful in this new social environment.
期刊論文
1.翁育瑄(2001)。唐代にをける官人階級の婚姻形態-墓誌銘を中心に。東洋學報,83(2),131-159。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ebrey, Patricia Buckley(1986)。Concubines in Song China。Journal of Family History,11,1-24。  new window
學位論文
1.Katkov, Neil Ennis(1997)。The Domestication of Concubinage in Imperial China。  new window
圖書
1.楊萬里。誠齋集。台北:商務。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋濂。文憲集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.張綱(1966)。華陽集。臺北市:臺灣商務。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋祁。景文集。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉辰翁。須溪集。  延伸查詢new window
6.趙孟頫。松雪齋集。  延伸查詢new window
7.周必大。文忠集。  延伸查詢new window
8.吳澄。吳文正集。  延伸查詢new window
9.戴良。九靈山房集。  延伸查詢new window
10.林弼(1983)。林登州集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.呂祖謙(1985)。東萊集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳旅(1986)。安雅堂集。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭元祐(1988)。僑吳集。北京:書目文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.Ebrey, Patricia Buckley(1992)。The Inner Quarters: Marriage and the Lives of Chinese Women in the Sung Period。University of California Press。  new window
15.吳泳(1983)。鶴林集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.蘇伯衡。蘇平仲文集。  延伸查詢new window
17.劉一止。苕溪集。  延伸查詢new window
18.謝肅(1986)。密菴集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
19.袁燮。絜齋集。  延伸查詢new window
20.趙汸(1971)。東山存稿。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
21.王褘。王忠文集。  延伸查詢new window
22.葉適、劉公純、王孝魚、李哲夫(1961)。葉適集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
23.陸游(1965)。渭南文集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
24.胡祇遹。紫山大全集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.汪藻。浮溪集。  延伸查詢new window
26.劉岳申。申齋集。臺北:國立中央圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳襄(1971)。古靈集。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
28.貢師泰、沈性(1986)。玩齋集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
29.宋濂、羅月霞(1999)。宋濂全集。杭州:浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
30.劉宰(1983)。漫塘集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
31.楊維楨(2007)。東維子集。香港:迪志文化出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
32.張栻。南軒集。  延伸查詢new window
33.李覯、王國軒(1981)。李覯集。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
34.真德秀。西山文集。  延伸查詢new window
35.慕容彥逢。摛文堂集。  延伸查詢new window
36.黃庭堅、劉琳、李勇先、王蓉貴(2001)。黃庭堅全集。四川大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
37.趙鼎臣(1983)。竹隱畸士集。臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
38.黃溍。黃文獻公集。  延伸查詢new window
39.任士林。松鄉集。迪志文化出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
40.揭傒斯。文安集。臺北:商務。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(元)王惲。秋澗集。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭。勤齋集。  延伸查詢new window
3.(元)同恕。榘菴集。  延伸查詢new window
4.(元)程鉅夫。雪樓集。  延伸查詢new window
5.滋溪文稿,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.(宋)范祖禹。范太史集。  延伸查詢new window
7.(宋)穆修。穆參軍集。  延伸查詢new window
8.(南宋)劉克莊。後村集。  延伸查詢new window
9.閬風集。  延伸查詢new window
10.(宋)黃仲元。四如集。  延伸查詢new window
11.(明)胡翰。胡仲子集。  延伸查詢new window
12.(宋)洪适。盤州文集。  延伸查詢new window
13.(宋)謝逸。溪堂集。  延伸查詢new window
14.(元)鄧文原。巴西集。  延伸查詢new window
15.(宋)魏了翁。鶴山集。  延伸查詢new window
16.(明)王行(1983)。半軒集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.(明)方孝孺(1983)。遜志齋集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.(宋)葛勝仲(1975)。丹陽集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.(南宋)孫覿。鴻慶居士集。  延伸查詢new window
20.(宋)熊克。中興小記。  延伸查詢new window
21.(宋)蘇頌(1988)。蘇魏公文集,河北。  延伸查詢new window
22.(宋)陳亮(1974)。陳亮集,北京。  延伸查詢new window
23.楊家駱(1962)。元文類,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
24.(宋)王安禮。王魏公集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
25.(南宋)樓鑰(1935)。攻媿集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
26.(宋)姚勉。雪坡集。  延伸查詢new window
27.(元)殷奎。強齋集。  延伸查詢new window
28.(南宋)劉克莊。後村大全集。  延伸查詢new window
29.(元)虞集(1968)。道園學古錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
30.(元)李存。俟菴集。  延伸查詢new window
31.(元)謝應芳。龜巢稿。  延伸查詢new window
32.(明)貝瓊。清江文集。  延伸查詢new window
33.(明)烏斯道。春草齋集。  延伸查詢new window
34.(元)程端學。積齋集。  延伸查詢new window
35.(明)凌雲翰。柘軒集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
36.(宋)文天祥。文山集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
37.(元)馬祖常。石田文集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
38.(元)王義山。稼村類稿。  延伸查詢new window
39.(宋)李昭玘。樂靜集。  延伸查詢new window
40.(元)劉因。靜修文集。  延伸查詢new window
41.(南宋)朱熹(1996)。朱文公文集,成都。  延伸查詢new window
42.(元)李祁。雲陽集。  延伸查詢new window
43.(宋)李彌遜。筠溪集。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top