:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:醫事、科技與倫理
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:蕭宏恩 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsiao, Hung En
出版日期:2004
卷期:31:11=366
頁次:頁31-44
主題關鍵詞:醫事科技醫事科技醫事目的醫療實踐價值取向MedicineScience and technologyMedical technologyMedical purposeMedical practiceThe orientation of values
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:15
     醫事科技的進展,的確為人們帶來了相當的福利,但是醫事科技的不當使用,亦會為人們帶來前所未有的問題與迷惑。這裡牽涉到醫事與科技的兩個面相:其一,科技應用於醫事活動之價值取向;其二,醫事本身是否即為一門科技?這�堜狾b題的焦點在於:以生理、解剖等科學為主的醫學,主導著當今的醫療活動,儼然意味著醫學就如同一般自然科學般之科學與技術的整合,而醫事活動所面對的正是強調個體殊異及其獨立無可取代之「身、心、靈」整全之人的生命,全然不同於一般科技之對象。本文即企欲由醫事與一般科技之對比,無論在研究、目的、實踐、成就或成功、以及道德性或價值等方面,而論科技在醫事內應用之倫理(道德)思考或價值取向。
     The progress of medical technology is indeed considerable profits to the mankind. However, improperly employed medical technology causes problems and confuses that have hitherto unknown to man. Medical activities actually involve two dimensions of medicine and technology: One, what is the orientation of values in applying technology to medical practice? The other, whether medicine itself is in fact a technology? The focus of the questions herein is that biomedicine, mainly in terms of physiology and anatomy, dominates today's medical activities, and acts like it is to signify that medicine is the combination of science and technology as natural science in general is. Yet, what medicine has to face is to emphasize individual's particularity as well as its independent and irreplaceable body, mind, and spirit of a complete man. This is utterly different from the object of natural science in general. The paper is intending to discuss the moral thinking or the orientation of values of science and technology applied in medicine, by way of the contrast between medicine and natural science in general, in its study, goal, practice, achievement, success or whatever: as well as its morality or value. It is going to talk about moral thinking or value orientation of technology in use within medical activities.
期刊論文
1.幕森(1998)。為什麼醫學不可能是一門科學?。中外醫學哲學,1(2),3-30。  延伸查詢new window
2.Goldmann, Lucien(1983)。The value of autopsies in three medical eras。New England Journal of Medicine,308,1000-1005。  new window
3.Gorovitz、MacIntyre(1976)。Toward a theory of medical fallibility。Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,1,51-71。  new window
圖書
1.王汎森、戴華(2001)。打開潘朵拉的盒子?基因科技的人文議題。臺北市:時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Norman, A. Donald(1995)。心科技。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gawande, Atul、廖月娟(2003)。一位外科醫師的修煉。臺北:天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.杜小真(1994)。勒維納斯。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
5.Naisbitt, John、Naisbitt, Nana、Philips, Douglas、尹萍(1999)。高科技.高思維。臺北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.戴正德(2001)。生死醫學倫理。臺北:健康文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top