:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:軍事專業價值與軍事專業典型之研究
書刊名:復興崗學報
作者:錢淑芬
作者(外文):Chen, Shu-feng
出版日期:2005
卷期:83
頁次:頁57-88
主題關鍵詞:軍事專業化軍事專業價值軍事專業典型志業型模型職業型模型
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:17
在國軍戮力於建立現代化的專業軍隊之際,同時近年來又在內外在環境的衝擊之下,志願役軍(士)官對軍事專業的價值認同與對專業典型的態度傾向,彼此之間是否會因為容易出現相互掣肘的情形,而影響國軍對建立現代化之專業軍隊的戮力,乃是本文關心的問題。本文嘗試從志願役軍(士)官對「志業型」與「職業型」這兩種軍事專業典型的認同程度,與他們對「傳統性」與「實用性」這兩種軍事專業(工具性)價值的認同程度的關聯性,提出四項研究假設,然後以陸軍、海軍、空軍、憲兵共計694位志願役軍(士)官做為樣本。研究發現,在軍事專業典型的態度認同方面,國軍志願役軍(士)官對軍隊的某些傳統規範與價值的認同,並不會因為對職業型的態度傾向愈明顯而變得愈不認同。同時軍事專業態度傾向於志業型的志願役軍(士)官,也不會因為對志業型的態度傾向愈明顯,就對軍職屬性裡關於實質酬賞與工作(報酬)等值回饋,或是對專業知能與生涯發展機會等具有實用性與功利性的部份變得愈不認同。此外,職業型態度愈明顯的國軍志願役軍(士)官,他們在職業型態度與軍事專業實用價值之間的關聯性上,大部份的變項都是顯著正相關;但是,志業型態度愈明顯的國軍志願役軍(士)官,他們在志業型態度與軍事專業傳統價值之間的關聯性上,只有少部份的變項是顯著正相關。
期刊論文
1.Alpass, F.、Long, N.、Macdonald, C.、Chamberlain, K.(1999)。The Moskos Institution-Occupation Model: Effects on Individual Work Related Perceptions and Experiences in the Military。Journal of Political and Military Sociology,27(1),67-80。  new window
2.Caforio, G.(1988)。The Military Profession: Theories of Change。Armed Forces & Society,15(1),55-69。  new window
3.Bourg, C.、Segal, M. W.(1999)。The Impact of Family Supportive Policies and Practices on Organizational Commitment to the Army。Armed Forces & Society,25(4),633-652。  new window
4.Boene, Bernard(1990)。How 'Unique' Should the Military Be? : A Review of Representative Literature and Outline of a Synthetic Formation。European Journal of Sociology,31(1),3-59。  new window
5.Dunivin, Karen O.(1994)。Military Culture: Change and Continuity。Armed Forces and Society,20(4),531-547。  new window
6.Ficarrotta, J. Carl(1997)。Are Military Professionals Bound by a Higher Moral Stan dard ?。Armed Forces & Society,24(1),59-75。  new window
7.Janowitz, Morris(1977)。Form Institutional to Occupational: The Need For Conceptual Continuity。Armed Forces and Society,4,51-54。  new window
8.Jans, N. A.(1989)。MilitaryProfessionalism: Changes in the Australian Defence Force。Armed Forces and Society,15(2),171-191。  new window
9.Keithly, D. M.(1997)。A Charismatic Dimension of Military Leadership ?。Journal of Political and Military Sociology,25(Summer),131-146。  new window
10.Nuciari, M.(1985)。Professione Militare e Modelli Interpretative: Alcune note di Discussione。Forarmes,1,128-163。  new window
11.Weibull, A.(1994)。European Officers' Job Satisfaction and Job Commitment。Current Sociology,42(3),57-70。  new window
12.Segal, R. D.、Lynch, B. A.、Blair, J. D.(1979)。The Changing American Soldier: Work-related Attitudes of U.S. Amry Personnel in World War II and the 1970s。American Journal of Sociology,85(1),95-108。  new window
13.Sorensen, Henning(1994)。New Perspectives on the Military Profession: The I/O Model and Esprit de Corps Reevaluated。Armed Forces & Society,20(4),599-617。  new window
14.Stahl, M. J.、Manley, T. R.、McNichols, C. W.(1978)。Operationalizing the Moskos Institution-Occupation Model: An Application of Gouldner's Cosmopolitan-Local Research。Journal of Applied Psychology,63(4),422-427。  new window
15.錢淑芬(20030600)。國軍志願役軍事官「志業型/職業型模式」建構之研究。國立政治大學社會學報,34,39-77。  延伸查詢new window
16.錢淑芬(20030600)。「社會隔離論」與「社會聚合論」對軍事專業影響的比較分析--兼論天職論與職業論對軍事專業價值的看法。復興崗學報,77,266_1+267-295。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Segal, D. R.(1986)。Measuring the Institutional / Occupational Change Thesis。Armed Forces & Society,12(3),351-378。  new window
18.Caforio, Giuseppe、Nuciari, Marina(1994)。The Officer Profession: Ideal-type。Current Sociology,42(3),33-56。  new window
19.Harries-Jenkins, Gwyn(1990)。The Concept of Military Professionalism。Defense Analysis,6(2),117-130。  new window
20.Huntington, Samuel P.(1963)。Power, Expertise and the Military Profession。Daedalus,92(4),785-807。  new window
21.Moskos, Charles C.(1986)。Institutional/Occupational Trends in Armed Forces: An Update。Armed Forces and Society,12(3),377-382。  new window
22.Nuciari, Marina(1994)。Rethinking The Military Profession: Models of Change Compared。Current Sociology,42(3),7-21。  new window
23.錢淑芬(20041200)。軍事專業價值與軍隊承諾之研究。復興崗學報,82,107-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Moskos, Charles C. Jr.(1977)。From Institution to Occupation: Trends in Military Organization。Armed Forces & Society,4(1),41-50。  new window
會議論文
1.錢淑芬(2003)。從軍事組織文化論人文教育與軍官角色性格。第六屆國軍軍事社會科學研討會。臺北:政治作戰學校軍事社會科學研究中心。1-51。  延伸查詢new window
2.Moskos, C. C.(198305)。The Emergent Military: Institutional, Traditional, or Plural?。The convention on 'The Spanish Military Institution in the Process of Change'。Madrid。  new window
3.Abrahamsson, B.(1972)。Introduction: The Study of Military Professionalization。Inter-University seminar on the Armed Forces and Society。Beverly Hills, California:Sage Publications, Inc.。12-18。  new window
4.Abrahamsson, B.(1972)。Social Change and The Military Profession: The Emergence of Technical and Organizational Expertise。Inter-University seminar on the Armed Forces and Society。Beverly Hills, California:Sage Publications, Inc。21-39。  new window
研究報告
1.錢淑芬(2002)。我國志願役軍士官職業態度之研究:社會變遷下的國軍素描。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hackett, J. G.(1983)。The Profession of Arms。London:Sidgwick & Jackson。  new window
2.金耀基(1966)。從傳統到現代。台北:金耀基。  延伸查詢new window
3.Janowitz, Morris(1960)。The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait。New York, NY:The Free Press。  new window
4.Rokeach, M.(1968)。Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change。Jossey-Bass。  new window
圖書論文
1.瞿海源、楊國樞(1972)。中國大學生現代化程度與心理需要的關係。中國人的性格。中央研究院民族研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Boene, Bernard(1984)。The Moskos and Thomas Models Contrasted。Military and Society: The European Experience。Munich:SOWI。  new window
3.Janowitz, Morris(1960)。Military Organization。Handbook of Military Institutions。Beverly Hills, California:Sage Publications, Inc。  new window
4.Sarkesian, Sam C.(1993)。Professionalism, Military。International Military and Defense Encyclopedia。Washington, DC:Brassey's (US), Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE