:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣與紐西蘭高等教育改革政策之比較
書刊名:教育資料與研究
作者:顏秀如張明輝
作者(外文):Yen, Hsiu-juChang, Ming-hui
出版日期:2005
卷期:63
頁次:頁19-36
主題關鍵詞:紐西蘭高等教育教育改革政策New ZealandHigher educationEducation reform policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:33
隨著全球化經的浪潮,國際間的競爭從軍事競賽轉為經濟成長的競爭。且自從經濟合作暨發展組織(Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD)提出知識經濟的概念後,以知識為基礎的新經濟型態成為各國發展的主要目標。而由於高等教育扮演知識創造、保存與傳遞的重要角色,因而高等教育為近年來許多國家教育改革的重要政策內涵。就臺灣而言,自政治解嚴以來,西求野等教育改革的呼聲即不曾停歇,為使高等教育的發展逐漸走向自由化、多元化、大眾化及國化,政府進行一連串的改革措施。本文以紐西蘭為比較對象,乃因紐西蘭雖為人口數約為380萬的島嶼國家,但卻為世界主要的農牧生產國之一,究其原因,「知識」是一項關鍵的因素。因此作者試圖對於臺灣與紐西蘭的高等教育改革政策做一比較研究,首先對其高等教育改革背景、相關問題及改革策略,加以析述,其次,則比較上述內涵的異同以供參考。
With the tides of global economics, the content of competitions among countries have changed from military competition into economic growth. Moreover, since Organization for Economic co-operation and Development (OECD) proposed the idea “knowledge-based economic”, the new type of economic based on knowledge has become the main object for the development of every country. Besides, higher education play the roles of knowledge invention, knowledge preservation, and knowledge transmission. Therefore, it becomes the important part of education reform in many countries in recent years. As far as Taiwan is concerned, since the government lifted martial laws, the claim of higher education reform has never stopped. In order to make higher education liberalized, pluralized, popularized, and internationalized gradually, the authorities adopt a series of reform strategies. New Zealand was chosed as a comparative object in this study because it is an island nation of roughly 3.8 million people. But New Zealand is one of the primary countries based on agriculture and herding industry in the world. To probe the reason, knowledge is a key factor. The authors tried to undertake a comparative study of higher education reform in Taiwan and New Zealand. Firstly, this article described and explained the higher education backgrounds, problems, and reform strategies between these two countries. Then, the author compared the differences of the contents illustrated above and finally gave conclusions. ※
期刊論文
1.洪雯柔(20001100)。紐西蘭高等教育概述。比較教育,49,33-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Sullivan, Keith(2002)。Education and policy and practice in contemporary Aotearoa- New Zealand。Mc Journal of Education,37,6-14。  new window
圖書
1.教育部(2001)。大學教育政策白皮醫。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊艾俐、楊瑪利、游常山、鄭一清(2003)。小國大志氣。臺北市:天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ministry of Education(2002)。Tertiary Education Strategy 2002-2007。Wellington:Ministry of Education。  new window
4.Ministry of Education(2002)。Territory education-excellence relevance and access。Wellington:Ministry of Education。  new window
5.Tertiary Education Advisory Commission(2000)。Shaping a shared vision。Wellington:TEAC。  new window
6.Tertiary Education Advisory Commission(2001)。Shaping the system。Wellington:TEAC。  new window
7.Tertiary Education Advisory Commission(2001)。Shaping the strategy。Wellington:TEAC。  new window
8.Tertiary Education Advisory Commission(2001)。Shaping the Funding Framework。Wellington:TEAC。  new window
9.教育部(2003)。中華民國教育統計。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.教育部(2002)。教育改革問與答,http://www.moe.gov.tw, 2003/04/10。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2004)。教育部未來四年施政主軸架構,http://www.moe.gov.tw, 2004/12/10。  延伸查詢new window
3.駐澳大利亞臺北經濟文化辦事處(2003)。紐西蘭高等及中等教育介紹,http://www.cuItural.teco.org.au/education/nz-ref.htm, 2003/05/25。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(1998)。教育改革行動方案,http://140.111.1.192/minister/action87/action87.htm, 。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE