:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣資訊電子業上市公司融資決策順位之研究--Ordered-logistic迴歸模式之應用
書刊名:輔仁管理評論
作者:古永嘉 引用關係鄭敏聰游佳鈴
作者(外文):Goo, Yeong-jiaCheng, Min-tsungYou, Jia-ling
出版日期:2005
卷期:12:3
頁次:頁41-69
主題關鍵詞:融資順位目標負債比率Tobit迴歸Ordered-logistic迴歸Pecking orderTarget debt ratioTobit regression modelOrdered-logistic regression model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:20
本文以57家臺灣資訊電子業上市公司為研究對象,研究期間為民國86年至90年。在第一階段以Tobit迴歸建立公司資本結構之目標負債比率估計式,實證結果顯示,股票服酬率、市價帳面值比、研發費用比率、公司規模等四項變數符合研究理論預期效果且顯著,故以此四項變數建立最適目標負債比率估計模式。第二階段以Ordered-logistic迴歸探討一般資訊電子業公司趨近目標負債比率與融資順位的狀況,實證結果顯示,臺灣資訊電子產業公司之負債比率確實會往目標負債比率移動,而影響公司融資選擇最大的變數為槓桿差異,其次為公司規模、資產報酬率、股票報酬率、研發費用比率,最後為市價帳面值比。另外,在此趨近目標負債比率情況下,其融資決策之順位依序為:普通股、短期負債、海外存託憑證、長期負債、可轉換負債。此結果並不服從融資順位理論,其原因可能與臺灣資訊電子產業所擁有的資產特殊性(Asset specificity)較高有關外,亦可能與其所生產的產品通常具有其特殊性或耐久性有關。此外在本文研究期間,臺灣資訊電子產業正積極向海外設廠及購併,所以在進行融資時,會較注重投資計畫的獲利能力與營運風險,因此在融資工具選擇方面,會較偏向使用權益融資。
The study collects 57 high-tech firms listed in the Taiwan Stock Exchange for 1997 to 2001. It comprehends two phases of regressions, Tobit regressions model to constitute the estimation model of target debt ratio of corporate capital structure, and Order-logistic regressions model to investigate the debt ratio toward the target and firms’ financing decision to pecking order. The findings from Tobit model indicate that four variables of return on stock, market value/book value, ratio of R&D expenditure and company scale are of significance to construct an optimal target debt ratio estimation model. Upon examining the financing decision among five variations, Order-logistic model predicts that the high-tech firms will adjust their capital structures to the target debt ratio and followed by the greatest variable of leverage difference are company scale, return on asset, return on stock ratio of R&D expenditure and market value/book value. To summarize, with the adjustment of debt ratio to the target, the pecking order of financing decision is common stock, short-term debt, depositary receipts, long-term debt and convertible debt. Whereas the results are inconsistent with the pecking order model, the factors may be characteristics of high asset specificity and product’s uniqueness and durability in this industry. In addition, as the high-tech firms striving for expansion and mergence during the study period, their financing decisions mostly issue equity by considering profitability and operating risk in investment.
期刊論文
1.Beven, A. A.、Danbolt, J.(2004)。Testing for inconsistencies in the estimation of UK capital structure determinants。Applied Financial Economics,14(1),55-66。  new window
2.Williamson, O. E.(1975)。Transaction Cost Economics: The Government of Contractual Relations。Journal of Law and Economics,22,233-261。  new window
3.Panno, A.(2003)。An Empirical Investigation on the Determinants of Capital Structure: the UK and Italian Experience。Applied Financial Economics,13(2),97-112。  new window
4.Ozkan, A.(2001)。Determinants of Capital Structure and Adjustment to Long Run Target: Evidence from UK Company Panel Data。Journal of Business Finance & Accounting,28,175-198。  new window
5.Jeenings, D. E.(1986)。Judging Inference Adequacy in Logistic Regression。Journal of the American Statistical Association,81,471-476。  new window
6.Hovakimian, A.(2004)。The Role of Target Leverage in Security Issues and Repurchases。The Journal of Business,77(4),1041-1072。  new window
7.Hauck, W. W.、Donner, A.(1977)。Wald's Test as Applied to Hypothesis in Logit Analysis。Journal of the American Statistical Association,72,851-853。  new window
8.Cai, F.、Ghosh, A.(2003)。Tests of Capital Structure Theory: A Binomial Approach。The Journal of Business and Economic Studies,9,20-32。  new window
9.Masulis, R. W.、Korwar, A. N.(1986)。Seasoned equity offerings: An empirical investigation。Journal of Financial Economics,15,90-118。  new window
10.Cassar, G.、Holmes, S.(2003)。Capital Structure and Financing of SMEs: Australian Evidence。Accounting and Finance,43(2),123-147。  new window
11.Modigliani, F.、Miller, M.(1958)。The Costs of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment。The American Economic Review,48(3),261-297。  new window
12.Hovakimian, Armen、Hovakimian, Gayane、Tehranian, Hassan(2004)。Determinants of Target Capital Structure: The Case of Dual Debt and Equity Issues。Journal of Financial Economics,71(3),517-540。  new window
13.MacKie-Mason, Jeffrey K.(1990)。Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions?。The Journal of Finance,45(5),1471-1493。  new window
14.Titman, Sheridan、Wessels, Roberto(1988)。The determinants of capital structure choice。The Journal of Finance,43(1),1-19。  new window
15.詹家昌、徐民欣(20030100)。檢定股利與負債的預測模式--抵換理論與融資順位理論。管理評論,22(1),25-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林祝英、劉正義(20031100)。企業研發投資對融資、股利政策與成長機會之影響--以電子資訊產業為例。風險管理學報,5(3),319-339。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Frank, Murray Z.、Goyal, Vidhan K.(2003)。Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure。Journal of Financial Economics,67(2),217-248。  new window
18.Baker, Malcolm P.、Wurgler, Jeffrey(2002)。Market Timing and Capital Structure。The Journal of Finance,57(1),1-32。  new window
19.Fama, Eugene F.、French, Kenneth R.(2002)。Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt。Review of Financial Studies,15(1),1-33。  new window
20.Fischer, Edwin O.、Heinkel, Robert、Zechner, Josef(1989)。Dynamic Capital Structure Choice: Theory and Tests。The Journal of Finance,44(1),19-40。  new window
21.Hovakimian, Armen、Opler, Tim、Titman, Sheridan(2001)。The debt-equity choice。Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,36(1),1-24。  new window
22.Shyam-Sunder, Lakshmi、Myers, Stewart C.(1999)。Testing Static Tradeoff against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure。Journal of Financial Economics,51(2),219-244。  new window
23.Myers, Stewart C.、Majluf, Nicholas S.(1984)。Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investor Do Not Have。Journal of Financial Economics,13(2),187-221。  new window
學位論文
1.辜儀芳(2002)。臺灣上市公司資本結構選擇之實證研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.王瑛璋(1994)。國內上市公司資本結構決定因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡志昇(1998)。台灣地區股票上市公司資本結構影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉振輝(1999)。多國籍企業及國內企業資本結構決定因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃小娟(1995)。公司資本結構差異性及其非財務影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.湯蕙霞(2003)。國內上市公司資本結構的長期調整(碩士論文)。銘傳大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.康峻維(2003)。初次公開發行後資本結構之實證研究分析--以台灣地區電子業與非電子業上市公司為例(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.江立雯(2000)。資本結構的影響因素之研究--以台灣地區上市電子業為例(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.藍瑞卿(2000)。台灣地區股票上櫃公司資本結構影響因素之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.蘇士哲(2000)。資本結構決定因素之研究--台灣資訊電子業上市公司之實證(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃重裕(1999)。產業最適資本結構之研究--以資訊電子業為例(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.邱淑芳(1992)。以代理成本觀念探討資本結構決定因素(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.張南寧(2003)。台灣地區上市公司資本結構之實證研究(碩士論文)。長庚大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE