:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:農會恢復股金制下信用部負責人的薪酬設計--代理模式之觀點
書刊名:農業經濟半年刊
作者:溫育芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Wen, Yue-fang
出版日期:2005
卷期:77
頁次:頁109-132
主題關鍵詞:資訊不對稱代理理論風險迴避Information asymmetryAgency theoryRisk aversion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:241
基於農會信用部與會員間存在資訊不對稱的問題,本研究採用代理理論的觀點,以Holmstrom (1979) 的模式為基礎,透過主理人與代理人的效用函數極大化的條件,進行農會信用部負責人的薪酬設計與信用部負責人激勵與監督管理問題的瞭解。 在農會恢復股金制的假設下,透過理論模式的推衍,本研究發現在資訊不對稱的情況下,且農會信用部負責人為風險迴避者時,隨著股金分配率的增加,負責人的努力水準將會提升,因此具有激勵的效果。此外,主理人與代理人的邊際替代率大於不存在資訊不對稱時的情況,故具有監督與管理的效果,雖存在資訊不對稱,但仍對主理人有利。
From the viewpoint of agency theory, this paper constructs models based the model of Holmstrom (1979) to explore the information asymmetry problems between the executives of Credit Departments of Farmers’ Associations and the members. By maximizing the utilities of principals and agents, the relation between compensation scheme and observability of the executives is discussed. On the assumption that the system of stock dividend is adopted again, it is shown that the effort level of the executives increases with the sharing of stock dividend when information asymmetry exists and the executives are risk-averse. The system of stock dividend could be used as a mechanism to encourage the executives. Besides, the marginal rate of substitution between the principles and the agents is larger than the one when information asymmetry does not exist. In this situation, it is beneficial to the principles, and the system of stock dividend has the functions of monitoring and management as well.
期刊論文
1.Jensen, M. C.(1983)。Organization Theory and Methodology。Accounting Review,58,319-339。  new window
2.陳永琦(20010900)。從制度經濟學分析我國農會信用部之經營問題與改進方向。臺灣金融財務季刊,2(3),187-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Kerr, J. L.、Bettis, R. A.(1987)。Boards of Directors, Top Management Compensation, and Shareholder Returns。Academy of Management Journal,30(1),645-664。  new window
4.Hölmstrom, Bengt(1979)。Moral Hazard and Observability。The Bell Journal of Economics,10(1),74-91。  new window
5.Boyd, Brian K.(1994)。Board Control and CEO Compensation。Strategic Management Journal,15(5),335-344。  new window
6.Attaway, M. C.(2000)。A study of the relationship between company performance and CEO compensation。American Business Review,18(1),77-85。  new window
7.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review。The Academy of Management Review,14(1),57-74。  new window
8.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
9.林維義(1999)。農會信用部經營危機之改革方向探討。金融財務,3,13-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.吳榮杰、劉祥熹、黃士榮(2003)。臺灣設立全國農業銀行可行方案之分析。臺灣土地金融季刊,40(1),47-66。  延伸查詢new window
11.李桐豪(1999)。國家金融管理再造與農(漁)會信用部的關係。金融財務,3,1-11。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳永琦(2001)。農會信用部改進方案比較及未來願景。臺灣經濟金融月刊,37(11),66-74。  延伸查詢new window
13.詹珍雅(1986)。資訊不對稱時主管認股模式之建立一極優法。管理科學學報,3,11-22。  延伸查詢new window
14.賴英照(1999)。農會信用部改革方向之評析。華信金融季刊,8,35-53。  延伸查詢new window
15.Bilimoria, D.(1997)。Perspectives on Corporate Control: Implications for CEO Compensation。Human Relations,50(7),829-858。  new window
16.Hill, N. T.、Stevens, K. T.(1995)。CEO Compensation and Corporate Performance。Journal of General Management,20(4),65-67。  new window
17.Jensen, M. C.、Murphy, K. J.(1990)。CEO Incentives: It's Not How Much You Pay, But How。Harvard Business Review,68(3),138-154。  new window
18.Joyce, W. B.(2001)。Return and Reward: Bank Performance and CEO Compensation。American Business Review,19(2),93-98。  new window
19.Madura, J.、Martin, A. D.、Jessel, K. A.(1996)。Determinants of CEO Compensation in Small Publicly-traded Businesses。American Business Review,14,80-88。  new window
20.Wright, P.、Kroll, M.(2002)。Executive Discretion and Corporate Performance as Determinants of ECO Compensation, Contingent on External Monitoring Activities。Journal of Management & Governance,6(3),189-214。  new window
研究報告
1.李紀珠、邱靜玉(2003)。當前農漁會信用部改革之評析。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.林享能(2002)。論農漁會信用部之改革。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳維民(2002)。健全農業金融活躍農村經濟。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳政穎(2000)。我國上市公司股權集中度、薪酬設計與公司經營績效關係之研究(博士論文)。國立政治大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊淑華(1992)。從代理理論觀點探究上市公司股權集中度與經營績效及市場評價的關係(碩士論文)。淡江大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.彭紹華(1992)。代理理論與所有權結構關係之研究:我國股票上市公司之實證,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.林宗鏞(2003)。農會信用部經營問題與組織改革之分析一從公司治理觀點,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Arrow, Kenneth Joseph(1965)。Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing。Helsinki:Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE