:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以生物武器嚇阻中國之軍事經濟分析
書刊名:全球政治評論
作者:曾偉君 引用關係黃思蘋
作者(外文):Tseng, Wei-chunHuang, Shi-ping
出版日期:2006
卷期:13
頁次:頁41-70
主題關鍵詞:生物武器衝突模型序列賽局戰損嚇阻戰略安全Biological weaponsCollaboration modelSequential gamesAttritionDeterrenceStrategic security
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:32
許多研究認為若是在臺灣單獨對抗中國的情況下,戰敗是遲早的事。目前中國的整體經濟實力約是臺灣的五倍,且差距日漸擴大;而臺灣的軍事投資以向外軍購為主,不具備使經濟成長的效果,因此若欲以大幅提高傳統武器軍事投資占國民所得之比重,做為軍事安全的唯一手段,則將犧牲經濟成長,導致與中國整體經濟實力差距加速擴大的惡性循環。因此本文探討以生物武器作為嚇阻工具,應用Stauvermann的重複序列賽局衝突模型,套用臺灣與中國的經濟實力,並加入戰損,計算兩岸發生戰爭的可能性,區別和平與戰爭的範圍。我們發現以生物武器嚇阻中國是可能成功的。此結果或可作為我方尋求其他安全手段,例如兩岸談判或強化臺美日軍事對話,的一個籌碼。
Taiwan and China have some subtle relationships. The trades and investments between Taiwan and China have being increasing significantly since 1980s. However, China never gives up using forces to attack Taiwan. So people in Taiwan live on a knife-edge between peace and war. The militarily strength is proportional to the Economic strength. China's economy is about five times of Taiwan's, and the gap is increasing. Purely relying on the tradition weapons is not sufficient to protect Taiwan. Biological weapons are powerful and hard to be uncovered. Taiwan has the necessary biological, medical, and scientific technologies to develop and deploy biological weapons. Thus this thesis applies game theories to investigate the possibility of using biological weapons to deter China and to maintain the peace. The games used are a basic sequential game, a sequential game with asymmetric information, and Peter Stauvermann's repeated sequential game conflict model. Taiwan's GDP and China's GDP are adopted to evaluate the possibilities of war and peace. Attritions are incorporated into the model to make the model more realistic. Both tradition wars and biological wars are simulated. We found that in many situations, the tremendous loss of the biological war can deter the ambition of the relatively strong party, China, to start a war. Using biological weapons to maintain peace is feasible. This resulsts can help Taiwan on the negotiations with China even Taiwan does not develop biological weapons, as long as Taiwan is able to develop such weapons secretly and in no time.
期刊論文
1.Osterholm, M. T.(2005)。Preparing for the next pandemic。Foreign Affaire,84,24-37。  new window
2.Check, Erika(2005)。Avian flu special: Is this our best shot?。Nature,435,404-406。  new window
3.Ferguson, Neil M.、Cummings, Derek A. T.、Cauchemez, Simon、Fraser, Christophe、Riley, Steven、Meeyai, Aronrag、Iamsirithawom, Sopon、Burke, Donald S.(2005)。Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia。Nature,437(7056),209-214。  new window
4.Le, Q. M.、Kiso, M.、Someya, K.、Sakai, Y. T.、Nguyen, T. H.、Nguyen, K. H.、Pham, N. D.、Ngyen, H. H.、Yamada, S.、Muramoto, Y.、Horimoto, T.、Takada, A.、Goto, H.、Suzuki, T.、Suzuki, Y.、Kawaoka, Y.(2005)。Avian flu: Isolation of drug-resistant H5N1 virus。Nature,437,1108。  new window
5.Holmes, E. C.、Taubenberger, J. K.、Grenfell, B. T.(2005)。Heading off an influenza pandemic。Science,309,989。  new window
6.Stauvermann, Peter(2002)。Why Is There So Much Peace?。Defence and Peace Economics,13(1),61-75。  new window
7.Enserink, M.(2005)。Pandemic vaccine appears to protect only at high doses。Science,309,996。  new window
8.林長盛、牛銘實(20031100)。論中共嚇阻美軍介入臺海衝突的軍事準備及其影響。中國大陸研究,46(6),59-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Lapan, Harvey E.、Sandler, Todd(1988)。To Bargain or Not to Bargain: That is The Question。The Political Economy of Terrorism,78(2),16-21。  new window
10.陳世民(20050100)。美國亞太駐軍的戰略調整與臺海安全。全球政治評論,9,85-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.蔡明彥(20040100)。中共跨世紀軍備發展策略分析。全球政治評論,5,59-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.丁樹範(20050500)。美國導彈防衛與核武態勢評估對中國核武政策影響。問題與研究,44(3),93-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林正義、莊世鴻(20001000)。臺灣安全與美國:行政部門VS.國會。國防政策評論,1,42-68。  延伸查詢new window
14.Fetter, Steve(1991)。Ballistic Missiles and Weapons of Mass Destruction: What is the Threat? What Should be Done?。International Security,16(1),5-42。  new window
15.蔡明彥(20031000)。日美同盟之發展與抉擇:兼論臺灣因應策略。全球政治評論,4,99-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Morgan, Patrick M.(1983)。Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
2.徐明達(2005)。禽流感大戰疫。台北:時報出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.殷天爵(2005)。拒絕毀減--大規模毁滅性武器預防與因應。台北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Miller, Judith、Engelberg, Stephen、Broad, William(2001)。Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War。NY:Simon & Schuster。  new window
5.McCormick, Joseph B.、Fisher-Hoch, Susan、何顆怡(2002)。第四級病毐。台北:商周出版。  延伸查詢new window
6.Miller, Judith、Engelberg, Stephen、Broad, William、齊思賢(2002)。細菌戰。台北:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bull, Hedley(1977)。Theanarchical Society。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
8.Ordeshook, Peter C.(1986)。Game Theory and Political Theory。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.國防部「國防報告書」編纂委員會(2002)。中華民國九十一年國防報告書。臺北:國防部。  延伸查詢new window
10.Alibek, K.、Handelman, S.(1999)。Biohazard。New York。  new window
11.WHO Group of Consultants。Health aspects of Chemical and Biological and Weapons。Geneva:World Health Organization。  new window
12.World Health Organization(2005)。WHO global influenza preparedness plan : the role of WHO and recommendations for national measures before and during pandemics。Geneva:Department of Communicable Disease, Suveillance and Response, Global Influenza Programme, World Health Organization。  new window
13.Myerson, Roger B.(1992)。Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict。  new window
14.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politics。McGraw Hill。  new window
15.Schelling, Thomas C.(1980)。The Strategy of conflict。Harvard University Press。  new window
16.Von Neumann, John、Morgenstern, Oskar(1947)。Theory of Games and Economic Behavior。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
17.Gabriel, Jürg Martin(1994)。World and Theories of International Relations。London, UK:MacMillam Press。  new window
18.Kissinger, Henry A.、胡國材(1982)。核子武器與外交政策。台北市:黎明文化。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Aron, Raymond(1968)。The Anarchical Order of Power。Conditions of World Order。New York:Simon and Schuster。  new window
2.Pearson, G.(1998)。The Threat of Deliberate Disease in the 21st Century。Biological Weapons Proliferation: Reasons for Concern, Courses of Action。Washington, D.C.:The Henry L. Stimson Center。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE