In 1989, the two major parties in Taiwan adopted the “primary system”to nominate electoral candidates. Fifteen years is a sufficient amount of time for scholars to examine whether the system has realized those goals seen by politicians as vital for Taiwan’s democracy. Based on the observation of this year’s party primaries, this article concludes that the arguments used for introducing the system are simply rhetoric. Similar to the American experience, party primaries in Taiwan have suppressed people with fewer resources from seeking public office, and have caused parties to adhere to their policies less and to be less accountable for their own performance. Even worse is that the fairness of party primaries in the United States is guaranteed by state governments, whereas the fairness of Taiwanese party primaries is not endorsed by the Taiwanese government, because the activity is seen as an internal affair of “social groups,”from which the government should keep its distance. This article expresses concern that if the primaries continue to operate in this way, they may undermine the foundations of Taiwan’s democracy.