:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣地區同業團體角色詮釋架構的建立
書刊名:止善
作者:王朝枝
作者(外文):Wang, Chao Chi
出版日期:2007
卷期:3
頁次:頁3-50
主題關鍵詞:同業團體詮釋架構結社自由Trade associationThe explaining to the skeletonThe freedom of company
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:817
  • 點閱點閱:20
台灣在解除戒嚴令之後,對人民集會結社自由的管制解除,一時之間,人民團體如雨後春筍般相繼成立,蘊積已久的民間力量,從社會各個角落開始宣洩,一波接一波的旺盛活力,簡直讓人目不暇給。卻也讓筆者注意到一件事,就是國內工商團體組織(即僱主團體組織)的功能似乎未見發揮,外界對於同業團體的了解,仍停留在表面的階段,對於內部實質運作的情形,缺乏深入的理論解釋。為此,筆者開始對人民團體進行研究。然而,在研究的過程中,愈發感受到台灣團體運作的特殊性,已非簡單運用一個理論所能解釋。為克服這層障礙,筆者採取多面向的研究角度,透過「歷史」、「結構」、「實證」、「參與觀察」四條路徑的交錯分析,嘗試描繪出台灣地區工業團體的真實樣貌。在此研究進路之下,筆者整理出一組基本的分析架構,藉此對僱主團體提出一種新的理解。但這種新視域的建立,原就牽涉甚廣,再加上詮釋架構尚處萌芽階段,使筆者在論述過程中,本著恓恓惶惶之心,深恐過度詮釋。但願這項期望與本文所呈現的論述之間,不致相距太遠。
After Taiwan declared its martial law ended, it also ended the restriction to its people's freedom of assembling. Suddenly, mass organizations were established rapidly and quickly. The folk strength, which was accumulated for a long time, began to be unleashed from every corners of the Taiwan society. The energetic waves of strength were hard to keep up with. However, it also led to the writer's attention on the local organizations of industry and commerce (organizations of employers), that their functions do not seem to be developed. The outside world's understanding of organizations of the lines of works still remains superficial. It lacks deeper explanations of theories regarding the real internal operating situation. For this reason, the writer began researching regarding mass organizations. However, in the process of research, the writer could sense even more about the uniqueness of Taiwanese organizations' operation. It could not be explained by simply using one theory. To overcome this barrier, the writer used a multidimensional approach to conduct his research. Through the paths of "history," "composition," "evidence," and "observation participation," with analysis, the writer tried to sketch out the real image of the organizations of industry of Taiwan area. On this direction of research, the writer organized a set of basic analyzing structure, and proposed a new understanding to the organizations of employers. But the establishments of this kind of new viewpoint were concerned widely at start. Also because the analyzing structure is still in the launching stage, the writer, with an anxious heart, was afraid of overstating, but still desired the presented statement of this article is not detached distantly from the expectation.
期刊論文
1.江迅、木魚(1987)。為民間社會辯護!--民主:中國未竟之革命。南方,10,33-39。  延伸查詢new window
2.Cawson, Alan(19780400)。Pluralism, Corporatism and the Role of the State。Government and Opposition,13(2),178-198。  new window
3.Cawson, Alan、沈宗瑞(19901200)。多元主義、組合主義及國家角色。憲政思潮,92,153-163。  延伸查詢new window
4.Taylor, Charles(1991)。Modlels of Civil Society。Public Culture,3(1)。  new window
5.Williamson, Peter J.、沈宗瑞(19900300)。組合主義與多元主義之辯。憲政思潮,89,60-72。  延伸查詢new window
6.沈宗瑞(19901000)。國家角色與社會--試論組合主義(Corporatism)的理論與應用。中山學術論叢,9,173-193。  延伸查詢new window
7.Almond, G. A.(1988)。The Return to the State。American Political Science Review,82(3),853-874。  new window
8.Bachrach, P.、Baratz, M. S.(1962)。Two Faces of Power。American Political Science Review,56(4),947-952。  new window
9.Eisenstadt, Shmuel N.、Roniger, Louis(1980)。Patron-Client Relation as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange。Comparative Studies in Society and History,22,42-77。  new window
10.Panitch, Leo(1980)。Recent Theorizations of Corporatism: Reflections on a Growth Industry。British Journal of Sociology,31(2),159-187。  new window
11.Krasner, Stephen D.(19840100)。Review Article: Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics。Comparative Politics,16(2),223-246。  new window
12.林佳龍(19890300)。威權侍從政體下的臺灣反對運動:民進黨社會基礎的政治解釋。臺灣社會研究季刊,2(1),117-143。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳介玄(1994)。派系網絡、樁腳網絡及俗民網絡--論台灣地方派系形成之社會意義。「地方社會與地方政治」學術專題研討會,東海大學社會學系暨研究所 (會議日期: 1994/04/23)。臺中。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳啓清(1998)。國家土地改革--戰後初期臺灣兩岸比較分析(博士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖益興(1993)。臺灣地區威權統治下的政經體制(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lukes, Steven(1973)。Power: A Radical View。London:Macmillan。  new window
2.Jessop, Bob(1990)。State Theory: Putting Capitalist State in Their Place。University Park, Pennsylvania:The Pennsylvania State University Press。  new window
3.陳其南(1999)。傳統制度與社會意識的結構。台北:允晨文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lindbolm, C. E.(1997)。Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic System。New York:Basic Books。  new window
5.Dahl, Robert A.(1961)。Who Governs?。New Haven, CT:Yale University Press。  new window
6.Lipset, S. M.(1965)。Political Man。NY:Doubledays。  new window
7.丁仁方(1999)。威權統合主義:理論、發展、與轉型。臺北:時英。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Hall, Peter A.(1986)。Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.高永光(1995)。論政治學中國家研究之新趨勢。臺北:永然文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich、范揚、張企泰(1985)。法哲學原理。台北:里仁。  延伸查詢new window
11.Black, Antony(1984)。Guilds and civil society in european political thought from the twelfth century to the present。Cornell University Press。  new window
12.Hegel, G. W. F.、Knox, T. M.(1976)。Philosophy of Right。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
13.沈清松(1992)。傳統的再生。台北:業強出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.石元康(19980000)。從中國文化到現代性:典範轉移?。臺北:東大。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.陳介玄(19950000)。貨幣網絡與生活結構:地方金融、中小企業與臺灣世俗社會之轉化。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳介玄(19940000)。協力網絡與生活結構:台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析。臺北:聯經。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.費孝通(1991)。鄉土中國。三聯書店(香港)有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
18.王振寰(1996)。誰統治台灣?轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Barrow, C. W.(1993)。Critical Theories of the State: Marxist, Neo-Marxist, Post-Marxist。Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bobbio, Norbert(1988)。Gramsci and the Concept of Civil Society。Civil Society and the State。Verso。  new window
2.市古宙三(1985)。1901-1911年政治和制度的改革。劍橋中國晚清史。北京:中國社會科學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.費維愷(1985)。1870-1911年晚清帝國的經濟趨向。劍橋中國晚清史。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chalmers, Douglas(1997)。Associative Networks: New Structures of Representation for the Popular Sectors?。The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Levine, Rhonda F.(1987)。Bringing Classes Back In: State Theory and Theories of the State。Recapturing Marxism: an Appraisal of Recent Trends in Sociological Theory。New York:Praeger。  new window
6.Riedel, Manfred、Wright, Walter(1984)。State, and ‘Civil Society': Linguistic Context and Historical Origin。Between Tradition and Revolution: The Hegelian Transformation of Political Philosophy。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Riedel, Manfred(1984)。The Concept of ‘Civil society’ and the Problem of its History Origin。The State and Civil Society。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Connolly, William E.(1969)。The Challenge to Pluralist Theory。The Bias of Pluralism。New York:Atherton。  new window
9.Lehmbruch, G.(1982)。Introduction: Neo-Corporatism in Comparative Perspective。Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making。Beverly Hills, CA:Sage。  new window
10.O'Donnell, Guillermo A.(1977)。Corporatism and the Question of the State。Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America。University of Pittsburgh Press。  new window
11.Schmitter, Philippe C.(1974)。Still the Century of Corporatism?。The New Corporatism: Social-Political Structures in the Iberian World。University of Notre Dame Press。  new window
12.Skocpol, Theda(1985)。Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research。Bringing the State Back In。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Cawson, Alan(1985)。Varieties of Corporatism: the Importance of the Meso-level of Interest Intermediation。Organized Interests and the State: Studies in Meso-Corporatism。Beverly Hills:SAGE Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE