:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從專利引用網路探討我國資訊電子業公司研發領域之變遷
書刊名:大學圖書館
作者:黃慕萱 引用關係蔣禮芸
作者(外文):Huang, Mu-hsuanChiang, Li-yun
出版日期:2006
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁2-29
主題關鍵詞:專利分析專利引用網路書目耦合專利計量學Patent analysisPatent citation mapBibliographic couplingPatent bibliometrics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:23
本研究之目得係利用專利引用網路,探討我國資訊電子業研發領域之變遷,以及公司與公司間之關聯性。研究對象計有59家公司,根據檢索結果,59家司於1992年至2000年間所擁有之美國專利數,總計有5,513篇,共包含引用專利數32,945篇。本研究採用文獻分析法、資料庫檢索及書目耦合分析等研究方法,以三年為一時段,對研究對象之引用專利進行書目耦合分析,再利用集群分析及多維尺度法繪製專利引用網路。研究結果顯示我國半導體業公司之關聯性最強;資訊電子業之子集合最明顯;且公司間之關係逐漸由分散走向集中,產業間之界線已愈來愈模糊,甚至有重疊的現象。
The purpose of this paper is to discus the transition of Taiwan’s information and electronic companies, and explore the relationship between companies and industries through plotting out patent citation maps. The fifty-nine companies studied in this paper, obtained 5513patents from U.S. between 1992 and 2000, and they cited 32,945 patents during these years. The research methods of this study include literature review, database retrieval, and used cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling to plot out patent citation maps. The result of this study shows that a higher similarity among companies in semiconductor sector, and the relationship between companies is getting closer. In addition, the distinction between industries grows more and more ambivalent, even overlapping in some cases.
期刊論文
1.Meyer, M.(2000)。Patent Citations in a Novel Field of Technology--What can they Tell about Interactions between Emerging Communities of Science and Technology?。Scientometrics,48(2),151-178。  new window
2.袁建中(20010100)。創造「知識經濟」最有效的武器--專利。網際先鋒,80,32-33。  延伸查詢new window
3.Van Raan, A. F. J.(1991)。Fractal Geometry of Information Space as Represented by Co-citation Clustering。Scientometrics,20(3),439-449。  new window
4.Kessler, M. M.(1963)。Bibliographic Coupling Between Scientific Papers。American Documentation,14,10-25。  new window
5.Narin, F.(1994)。Patent bibliometrics。Scientometrics,30(1),147-155。  new window
6.孟憲鈺、黃明居、張東淼、郭光輝(20000600)。產業創新指標:專利引用分析與專利指標。科技管理學刊,5(1),31-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Tijssen, R. J. W.、Buter, R. K.、Van Leeuwen, Th. N.(2000)。Technological Relevance of Science: an Assessment of Citation Linkages between Patents and Research Papers。Scientometrics,47(2),389-412。  new window
8.Ellis, P.、Hepburn, G.、Oppenheim, C.(1978)。Studies on Patent Citation Networks。Journal of Documentation,34(1),12-20。  new window
9.Verspagen, B.(2000)。The role of large multinationals in the Dutch technology infrastructure: A patent citation analysis。Scientometrics,47(2),427-448。  new window
10.Narin, F.、Olivastro, D.(1998)。Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison。Scientometrics,41(1/2),51-59。  new window
11.馬維揚、楊永列(20010100)。高科技產業實證研究的基本思考--科學園區之觀察。產業論壇,2(2),31-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Karki, M. M. S.(1997)。Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool。World Patent Information,19(4),269-272。  new window
圖書
1.中華民國八十九年資訊工業年鑑編纂小組(2001)。中華民國八十九年資訊工業年鑑。台北市:資訊工業策進會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Egghe, Leo、Rousseau, Ronald(1990)。Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science。Elsevier。  new window
其他
1.經濟部智慧財產局(2004)。九十一年本國申請人專利公告核准案件數排名,http://www.moeaipo.gov.tw/patent/patent_jreport/九十一年本國申請人專利公告核准案件數排名.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top