一、中文部份
(一) 圖書
王淑儀(民87)。電腦科學文獻老化研究--兼論同時法與歷時法之特質。淡江大學教育資料科學學研究所，臺北市。
朱明珠(民89)。以美國Amgen公司為例探討生技醫藥公司發展之專利策略。未出版之碩士論文，國立交通大學科技管理所，新竹市。
何光國(民83)。文獻計量學導論。臺北市：三民。
吳嘉雯(民87)。半導體文獻雙被引現象分析。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學教育資料科學學，臺北市。
李亞蘭(民88)。從引用文分析探討臺灣地區傳播學研究特質：以國立政治大學新聞學。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學教育資料科學學研究所，臺北市。
李淑貞(民85)。產業利用專利資訊之研究：以我國半導體廠商為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
杜家瑞(民88)。藉由生物技術專利分析擬定研發策略。未出版之碩士論文，國立清華大學生命科學研究所，新竹市。
林其美(民85)。外人投資、研究發展與外溢效果─台灣製造業實證研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學經濟研究所，臺北市。
林龍德(民87)。私立大學碩士論文引用文獻特性及其所屬圖書館支援情況之探討。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學教育資料科學學研究所，臺北市。
夏尚俐(民90)。作者與期刊自我引用：兼論同時法與歷時法之比較。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所，臺北市。
馬曉馨(民87)。期刊生產力與引用關係：以半導體文獻為例。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學教育資料科學學研究所，臺北市。
涂敏芬(民90)。以混沌觀點探討產業與技術改變。未出版之碩士論文，國立清華大學科技管理研究所，新竹市。
陳秀慧(民89)。網路資源之引用分析：以國內圖書館學與資訊科學期刊及八十九年國科會。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學資訊與圖書館研究所，臺北市。
陳契盈(民88)。由專利資料分析我國之研發產出及其關聯。未出版之碩士論文，國立中央大學工業管理研究所，中壢市。
陳威勳(民78)。R&D外溢效果之研究──文獻評介、理論探討與實證分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所，中壢市。
陳達仁、黃慕萱(民91)。專利資訊與專利檢索。臺北市：文華。馮斌、謝先芝編著(民92)。基因工程技術。臺北市：五南。
黃惠美(民89)。期刊文獻作者生產力與引用關係：以臺灣地區圖書館與資訊科學為例。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學資訊與圖書館學研究所，臺北市。楊志海(民87)。技術來源, 創新與生產力。未出版之博士論文，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所，中壢市。
劉京玫(民89)。影響係數、被引用次數與期刊重要性和作者影響力關係之探討。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，臺北市。
蔡佳玲(民89)。我國社會科學學術期刊論文引用灰色文獻之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學圖書資訊研究所，臺北市。
蔡明月(民92)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館。(二) 期刊文獻
田蔚城(民86)。生物技術導論。生物產業，8(1)，1-12。
朱明珠(民81)。專利資料檢索與應用。食品工業，24(11)，8-13。
李秀英(民86)。從技術專利指標探索全球技術競爭力。臺灣經濟研究月刊，20(9)，78-84。
孟憲鈺等(民89)。產業創新指標：專利引用分析與專利指標(1)。科技管理專刊，5(1)，31-49。林聖富(民85)。專利資訊和專利檢索。智慧財產權管理，10，15-17。
邵宇奇(民89)。美國專利標示。智慧財產權，19，42-49。姚仁德(民87a)。以專利統計做為經濟指標。工業財產權與標準，60，20-25。
姚仁德(民87b)。從我國專利的質與量看技術進步。工業財產權與標準，61，11-17。
姚仁德(民87c)。專利與科技競爭力。工業財產權與標準，65，52-57。
陳志華(民82)。專利資訊之應用與檢索。工業財產權與標準，9，1-34。
傅顯達(民80)。生物技術與專利制度。科學發展，19(7)，928-934。
曾惠中(民84)。遺傳工程的發展及其社會影響。通識教育季刊，2(3)，161-172。
楊彥序、蔡明月(民92)。隨機對照試驗醫學文獻之成長與作者生產力研究。資訊傳播與圖書館學，9(3)，31-46。蔡坤宏(民86)。臺灣研究發展對專利之影響效果。中山管理評論，5(2)，371-382。蔡明月(民86a)。文獻成長現象。中國圖書館學會會報，59，135-153。蔡明月(民86b)。書目計量學、科學計量學與資訊計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，34(3)，268-284。蔡明月(民86c)。學術傳播與書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，35(1)，38-57。蔡明月(民88)。齊夫(Zipf)定律。教育資料與圖書館學，37(2)，165-183。
蔡明月、尤慧敏(民92)。臺灣地區生命科學研究者發表期刊論文之生產力研究。國家圖書館館刊，92(2)，1-27。謝明華(民85)。專利地圖及其策略性應用研究。科學發展，24(11)，923-931。
謝寶煖(民87)。專利與專利檢索。大學圖書館，2(4)，111-127。鍾景慧(民85)。專利文獻之檢索與應用。智慧財產權管理，10，18-21。
羅麗珠(民83)。專利法對新科技之保護：生物與醫藥領域。生物產業，5(1/2)，69-71。
蘇遠志(民82)。我國生物技術產業之發展策略(下)。生物產業，4(3/4)，1-11。
蘇遠志(民82)。我國生物技術產業之發展策略(上)。生物產業，4(1/2)，1-11。
二、西文部份
(一) 圖書
Borgman, C. L. (1990). Introduction. In Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics. Newbury Park: Sage, p. 10-27.
Cottrill, C. A. (1987). A co-citation study of the scientific literature of two innovation research traditions: diffusion of innovations and technology transfer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities.
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible college: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Criscuolo, Paola (2002). Reverse technology transfer: A patent citation analysis of the European chemical and pharmaceutical sectors (Research Memoranda 036). Maastricht: MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
Dahling, R. L. (1962). Shannon’s information theory: the spread of an idea. In E. Katz (Ed.), Studies of innovation and of communication to the public. Standford, CA: Stanford University, Institute for Communication Research.
Donohu, J. C. (1973). Techniques. In Understanding scientific literatures: a bibliometric approach. Cambridge: MIT.
Dunn. H. (1979). Bibliometric Analysis of the Patent Literature and its Relationship to the Scientific Journal Literature. Case Western Reserve University, School of Library and Information Science: PhD Dissertation.
Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Evered, D. & Harnett, S. (Ed.). (1989). The evaluation of scientific research. New York: J. Wiley.
Franklin, J. J. & Johnston, R. (1988). Co-citation bibliometric modeling as a tool for S & T and R & D Management: issues applications and development. In A. F. J. Van Raan, (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Amsterdam: North Holland. 325-389.
Garfield, F. (1965). Can citation indexing be automated? In Stevens, M. E., Giuliano, E., Laurence, B. & Heilprin, E. ed. Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation, Symposium Proceedings, Washington, 1964: 189-192. Retrieved May 17, 2002, from www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/.
Garfield, F. (1979). Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, Technology and the Humanities. New York: Wiley.
Garfield, F. (1980b). ABCs of cluster mapping: part 1 most active fields in the life sciences in 1978. In Garfield, F., ed. Essays of an information scientist. Philadelphia: ISI Press. 131-138. Retrieved May 17, 2002, from www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/.
Hjerppe, R. (1978). An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.
Jaffe, Adam B., Fogarty, Michael S. & Banks, Bruce A. (1997). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation (NBER Working Paper 6044). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Kochen, M. (1974). Principles of Information Retrieval. Los Angeles: Melville Press.
Lin, Y. (1997). The intellectual structure of political communication research: an author co-citation analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Oklahoma.
Mann, P. H. & Stockham, P. (1976). Current trends in scholarly monograph publishing. In British Library Research and Development Department, Trends in Scholarly Publishing. London, U.K.: British Library.
Meadow, A. J. & Wharmby, E. (1976). Current trends in scholarly journal publishing. In British Library Research and Development Department, Trends in Scholarly Publishing. London, U.K.: British Library.
Meadows, Donella H. (1972). The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London: Pan Books.
Menard, H. W. (1971). Science: growth and change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Oliver, R. W. (1999). The coming biotech age: the business of bio-materials. New York: McGraw.
Poland, J. A. (1994). Informal communication among scientists and engineers. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, v. 53. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Price, Derek J. de Solla (1975). Science since Babylon. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Price, Derek J. de Solla (1986). Little science, big science – and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
Rifkin, J. (1999). The Biotech Century: Harnessing the gene & remaking the world. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.
Rousseau, R. (1990). Time table of bibliometrics. Retrieved May 17,2002, from http://users.pandora.be/ronald.rousseau/html/time_table_of_ bibliometrics.html
Sayers, S. L. (1983). The use of co-citation analysis to identify the cognitive structure of clinical nutrition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.
Senker, J., Joly, P. B. & Reinhard, M. (1996). Overseas biotechnology research by Europe’s chemical/pharmaceuticals multinternationals: rationale and implications. Brighton, Sweden: University of Sussex.
Walker, R. D. (1995). Patents as scientific and technical literature. Metuchen, N.J.: The Scarecrow Press.
Wallace, Danny P. (1985). The relationship between journal productivity and quality. In Carol A. Parkhurst (Ed.), Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, (pp. 193-196). White Plain, New York: Knowledge Industry Publications.
Weinstein, M. (1971). Citation index. In A. Kent & H. Laqncor (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information science, (Vol 5). N.Y.: Marcel Dekker, 16-40.
(二) 期刊文獻
Ackerson, L. G (1999). Visualizing the configuration of scientific literature: a study of disciplinary relationships. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 39(1), 43-52.
Albert, Armando & Plaza, Luis M. (2004). The transfer of knowledge from the Spanish public R & D system to the productive sectors in the field of biotechnology. Scientomeric, 59(1): 3-14.
Allen, J. & Oppenheim, C. (1979). The overlap of US and Canadian patents literature with journal literature. World Patent Information, 1(2), 77-80.
Almeida P. (1996). Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinational: patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 155-165.
Alvarez, P. & Pulgarin, A. (1998). Equating research production in different scientific fields. Information Processing & Management, 34(4), 465-70.
Anderson, J., Williams, N., Seemungal, D., Narin, F. & Olivastro, D. (1996). Human genetic technology: exploring the links between science and innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 135-156.
Baker, D. R. (1990). Citation analysis: a methodological review. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 26(3), 3-10.
Banerjee, P., Gupta, B. M. & Garg, K. C. (2000). Patent statistics as indicators of competition: an analysis of patenting in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 47(1), 95-116.
Bare, R. (1981). Results of statistical study of the references cited in the search reports established by the EPO, World Patent Information, 3, 56-60.
Beniger, J. (1988). Information and communication: the new convergence. Communication Research, 15, 198-218.
Bigwood, M. P. (1997). Patent trend analysis: incorporate current year data. World Patent Information, 19(4), 243-249.
Bordons, M., Gomez, L. Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M.A.& Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical-research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279-295.
Borgman, C. L. (1989). Bibliometrics and scholarly communication. Communication Research, 16(5), 583-599.
Borgman, C. L (1999). Books, bytes, and behavior: rethinking scholarly communication for a global information infrastructure. Information Services & Use, 19, 117-121.
Boyce, B. R. & Banning, C. S. (1979). Data accuracy in citation studies. RQ, 18(4), 349-350.
Broadus, R. N. (1983). An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(2), 132-135.
Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford’s law and the bibliography of science. Nature, 224, 953-956.
Brookes, B. C. (1971). Optimum p% library of scientific periodicals. Nature, 232, 458-461.
Brooks, B. C. (1988). Bibliomerics at L.U.C. Diepenbeck. Journal of Information Science, 14, 63-64.
Buckland, M. K. (1972). Are obsolescence and scattering related? Journal of Documentation, 28(3), 242-245.
Carpenter, M. P., Cooper, M. & Narin, F. (1980). Linkage between basic research literature and patents. Research Management, 23, 30-35.
Carpenter, M. P. & Narin, F. (1973). Clustering of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(6), 425-436.
Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F. & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3(4), 160-163.
Cason, H. & Lubotsk, M. (1936). The influence and dependence of psychological journal on each other. Psychological Bulletin, 33, 95-103.
Cawkell, A. E. (1976). Understanding science by analyzing its literature. The Information Scientist, 10(1), 3-10.
Cawkell, A. E. (1980). Electronic information processing and publishing-problems and opportunities. Journal of Information Science, 2(3/4), 189-192.
Clark, A. W. (1979). Information use: a professional strategy. Human Relations, 32(6), 503-522.
Cole, J. R. & Cole, S. (1974). Citation analysis. Science, 183(4120), 28-33.
Collins, P. & Wyatt, S. (1988). Citations in patents to the basic research literatures. Research Policy, 17, 65-74.
Cooley, S. & Allen, T. J. (1974). The technological gatekeeper and policies for national and international transfer of information. R & D Management, 5(1), 29-33.
Coplen, R. (1979). Subscription agents: to use or not to use. Special Libraries, 70(2), 519-526.
Courtial, J. P. (1993). The use of patent titles for identifying the topics of invention and forecasting trends. Scientometrics, 26(2), 231-242.
Crane, D. (1970). The nature of scientific communication and influence. International Social Science Journal, 22(1), 28-41.
Dalpe, Robert (2002). Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology. Scientometrics, 55(2): 189-213.
De Arenas, Judith. Licea, Castanos-Lomnitz, Heriberta & Arenas-Licea, Judit (2002). Significant Mexican research in the health sciences: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 53(1), 39-48.
Demidowicz, B. K. & Oppenheim, C. (1981). The overlap of patent and journal literature on animal feedstuffs. World Patent Information, 3, 82-83.
Ding, Y. (1998a). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics: Part I. The scholarly communication model – literature review. International Forum on Information and Documentation, 23(2), 20-29.
Ding, Y. (1998b). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics: Part II. The scholarly communication process – literature review. International Forum on Information and Documentation, 23(3), 3-19.
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G. & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: an author co-citation analysis 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science, 25(1), 67-78.
Doreian, P. (1988). Testing structural-equivalence hypotheses in a network of geographical journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(2), 79-85.
Drott, M. C. (1995). Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 299-305.
Egghe, L. (1986). The dual of Bradford’s Law. Journal of the American Society for Informaton Science, 37(4), 246-255.
Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (1996). Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data. Journal of Information Science, 22(3), 165-170.
Ehikhamenor, F. A. (1990). Productivity of physical scientists in Nigerian universities in relation to communication variables. Scientometrics, 18(5-6), 437-444.
Eisenschitz, T. S., Lazard, A. M. & Willey, C. J. (1986). Patent groups and their relationship with journal literature. Journal of Information Science, 12, 53-58.
Eisenschitz, T. S., McKie, L. J. & Warne, K. (1989). Communication of information in U.S. biotechnology patents. World Patent Information, 11(1), 28-32.
Ellen, S. R. (1979). Survey of foreign language problems facing the research worker. Interlending Review, 7(2), 31-41.
Ellis, P. (1978). Studies on patent citation networks. Journal of Documentation, 34(1), 12-20.
Ellis, D., Allend, D. & Wilson, T. D. (1999). Information science and information systems: conjunct subjects disjunct disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1095-1107.
Eom, S. B. (1998). The intellectual development and structure of decision support systems (1991-1995). OMEGA, 26(5), 639-657.
Eom, S. B. (1999). Decision support systems research: current state and trends. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(5), 213-220.
Eto, H. & Candelaria, P.M. (1987). Applicability of the Bradford distribution to international science and technology indicators. Scientometrics, 11(1-2): 27-42.
Everett, J. E. & Pecotich, A. (1991). A combined loglinear/MDS model for mapping journals by citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(6), 405-413.
Fairthorne, R. A. (1969). Empirical hyperbolic distribution (Bradfor-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description. Journal of Documentation, 25, 319-343.
Fang, P. H. & Fang, J. M. (1995). A modification of Lotka’s function forscientific productivity. Information Processing and Management, 31(1), 133-137.
Forscher, B K. (1980). The role of the referee. Scholarly Publishing, 11(2), 165-169.
Frame, J. (1991). Modelling national technological capacity with patent indicators. Scientometrics, 22(3), 327-339.
Frame, J. D. & Narin, F. (1976). NIH funding and biomedical publication output. Federal Proceedings, 35(14), 2529-2532.
Fussler, H. H. (1949a). Characteristics of the research literature used by chemists and physicists in the United States: part I. Library Quarterly, 19(1), 19-35.
Fussler, H. H. (1949b). Characteristics of the research literature used by chemists and physicists in the United States: part II. Library Quarterly, 19(2), 119-143.
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.
Garfield, F. (1980a). Bradford’s law and related statistical patterns. Current Contents, 19: 5-12.
Garfield, F. (1998). From citation indexes to informetrics: is the tail now wagging the dog? Libri, 48, 67-80.
Garg, K. C. & Padhi, P. (1998). Scientometric study of laser patent literature. Scientometrics, 43(3), 443-454.
Garvey, W. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8(13), 123-136.
Gil-Leiva, Isidoro & Pulgarin, Antonio (2004). Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature: 1956-2000. Information Processing and Management, 40(2), 365-377.
Gittelman, Michelle & Kogut, Bruce (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366-382.
Goffman, W. & Morris, T. G. (1970). Bradford’s law and library acquisitions. Nature, 226, 922-923.
Gordon, M. D. (1978). Disciplinary differences, editorial practices, and the patterning of rejection rates for U.K. research journals. Journal of Research Communication Studies, 1(2), 139-159.
Gordon, M. D. & Santman, A. (1980). Language barriers, literature usage, and the role of reviews: an international and interdisciplinary study. Journal of Information Science, 3(4), 185-189.
Gregory, J. G. (1983). Citation study of peripheral theories in an expanding research front. Journal of Information Science, 7, 73-80.
Griffith, B. C., Small, H. G., Stonehill, J. A. & Dey, S. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures II: toward a macro- and microstructure for science. Science Studies, 4(4), 339-365.
Gross, P. L. K. & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 1229-1234.
Gupta, B. M. & Karisiddappa, C.R. (1996). Author productivity patterns in theoretical population genetics (1900-1980). Scientometrics, 36(1), 19-41.
Gupta, B. M. & Karisiddippa, C. R. (1999). Collaboration and author productivity: a study with a new variable in Lotka’s law. Scientometrics, 44(1), 129-134.
Gupta, B. M. & Karistiddappa, C. R. (2000). Modelling the growth of literature in the area of theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 49(2), 321-355.
Gupta, B. M., Kumar, S. & Aggarwal, B. S. (1999). A comparison of productivity of male and female scientists of CSIR. Scientometrics, 45(2), 269-289.
Gupta, B. M., Sharma, L & Kumar, S. (1998). Literature growth and author productivity patterns in Indian physics. Information Processing and Management, 34(1), 121-131.
Gupta, D. K. (1992). Scientometric study of exploration geophysics: author productivity trends. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 39(4), 145-152.
Gupta, D. K. (1993). Collaborative research trend in exploration geophysics. Scientometris, 28(3), 287-296.
Haiqi, Z. & Yamazaki, S. (1998) Citation indicators of Japanese journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 375-9.
Harhoff, Dietmar, Narin, Francis, Scherer, F. M. & Vopel, Katrin (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3): 511-515.
Harter, Stephen P. (1971). The Cranfield II Relevance Assessments: a Critical Evaluation. The Library Quarterly, 41, 229-43.
Hawkins, D. T. (1977). Unconventional uses of on-line information retrieval system: on-line bibliometric studies. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 28, 13-18.
Heffiner, A. G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, 3(1), 5-12.
Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citations be simplified? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(6), 308-310.
Hills, P. J. (1983). The scholarly communication process. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 18, 99-125.
Huber, John C & Wagner-Dobler, Roland (2001a). Scientific production: a statistical analysis of authors in mathematical logic. Scientometrics, 50(2), 323-337.
Huber, John C & Wagner-Dobler, Roland (2001b). Scientific production: a statistical analysis of authors in physics, 1800-1900. Scientometrics, 50(3), 437-453.
Huang, Mu-Hsuan, Chiang, Li-Yun & Chen, Da-Zen (2003). Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies. Scientometrics, 58(3): 489-506.
Iversen, E. J. (2000). An excursion into the patent-bibliometrics of Norwegian patenting. Scientometrics, 49(1), 63-80.
Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79, 957-970.
Jonge, A. P. de (1982). Statistical evaluation of patent applications on inventions in a field of coherent subjects as a base for R & D policy. World Patent Information, 4(2), 56-59.
Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: a policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 33(4), 269-272.
Kessler, M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
Kim, M. J. (1998).A comparative study of citations from papers by Korean scientists and their journal attributes. Journal of Information Science, 24(2), 113-21.
King, D. W. & Roderer, N. K. (1979). Electronic processes: a solution to the problems facing small journals. Journal of Research Communication Studies, 2(1), 39-53.
King, J. (1987). A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13, 261-276.
Koenig, M.& Harrell, T. (1995). Lotka’s Law, Price’s Urn, and electronic publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(5), 386-388.
Kostoff, R. N. (1998). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation. Scientometircs, 43(1), 27-43.
Kumar, S, Sharma, P & Garg, K.C. (1998). Lotka’s law and institutional productivity. Information Processing and Management, 34(6), 775-783.
Kushkowski, J. D., Gerhard, K. H. & Dobson, C. (1998). A method for building core journal lists in interdisciplinary subject areas. Journal of Documentation, 54(4), 477-88.
Kyvik, S. (1989). Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka’s law. Scientometrics, 15(3-4): 205-214.
Lancaster, F. W. & Smith, L. C. (1978). Science, scholarship and the communication of knowledge. Library Trends, 27(3), 367-387.
Lau, T. Y. (1981). Chinese communication studies: a citation analysis of Chinese communication research in English-language journals. Scientometrics, 33(1), 65-91.
Leimkuhler, F.F.(1967). The Bradford distribution. Journal of Documentation, 23(3), 197-207.
Leydesdorff, L. & Wouters, P. (1999). Between texts and contexts: advances in theories of citation? Scientometrics, 44(2), 169-182.
Lievrouw, L. A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16(5), 615-628.
Lifshin, A. (1993). Citation analysis of Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1951-1960. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(6), 322-326.
Line, M. B. & Sandison, A. (1974). Obsolescence and changes in the use of literature with time. Journal of Documentation, 30(3), 283-350.
Logan, E. I. & Shaw Jr., W. M. (1991). A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in a medical specialty. Scientometrics, 20(3), 417-426.
Longuet-Higgins,H. C.(1970). The language of science. Times Literary Supplement, 3558, 505-506.
Lopez-Munoz, Francisco, Alamo, Cecilio, Rbio, Gabriel, Garcia-Garcia, Pilar, Martin-Agueda, Belen & Cuenca, Eduardo (2003). Bibliometric analysis of biomedical publications on SSRI during 1980-2000. Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 95-103.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution on scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academic Science, 16(12), 317-323.
Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R. J. W., Persson, O. & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15-36.
Lynch, M. F. (1977). Variety generation: a reinterpretation of Shannon’s mathematical theory of communication, and its implications for information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 19-25.
Macias-Chapula, C. A. (1992). Patterns of scientific communication among Latin American countries, in the field of medical education. Scientometrics, 23(1), 123-135.
MacRobert, M. H. & MacRobert, B. R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435-444.
Malo, Stephane & Geuna, Aldo (2000). Science-technology linkages in an emerging research platform: the case of combinatorial chemistry and biology. Scientometrics, 47(2): 303-321.
Mann, P. H. (1981). Publishing the scholarly author. Scholarly Publishing, 12(2), 99-108.
Mansfield, E. (1990). Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, 20, 1-12.
Maricic, S., Spaventi, J., Pavicic, L.& Pifat-Mrzljak, G., (1998). Citation context versus the frequency counts of citation histories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(6), 530-40.
Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. The Journal of Documentation, 20(3), 236.
McCain, K. W. (1986). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 111-122.
McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: an experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296.
McCain, K. W. (1995). The structure of biotechnology R & D. Scientometrics, 32(2), 153-175.
McCain, K. W. (1998). Neural networks research in context: a longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 41(3), 389-410.
McCain, Katherine W. (1995). Biotechnology in context: a database-filtering approach to identifying core and productive non-core journals supporting multidisciplinary R & D. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(4), 306-317.
McMillan, G. Steven & Hamilton, Robert D. (2000) Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: an analysis of the US Pharmaceutical Industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12(4), 465-475.
Meyer, M. (2000a). Does science push technology? Patent citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29, 409-434.
Meyer, M. (2000b). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49(1), 93-123.
Milman, B. L. & Gavrilova, Y. A. (1993). Analysis of citations and co-citation in chemical engineering. Scientometrics, 27(1), 53-74.
Moed, Henk F. (2000). Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies. Scientometrics, 47(2): 323-346.
Moed, H. F., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Reedijk, J. (1999). Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact. Scientometrics, 46(3), 575-589.
Moravcsik, M. J. (1984). Address at the presentation of the first Derek de Solla Price Award to Eugene Garfield on December 20, 1984. Scientometrics, 7, 143-144.
Moravcsik, M. J. & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92.
Morris, T. A. & McCain, K. W. (1998). The structure of medical informatics journal literature. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5(5), 448-466.
Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.
Narin, F. (1995). Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output. Scientometrics, 34(3), 489-496.
Narin, F. & Hamilton, K. S. (1996). Bibliometric performance measures. Scientometrics, 36(3), 293-310.
Narin, F. & Moll, J. K. (1977). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 12, 35-58.
Narin, F. & Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 369-381.
Narin, F., Noma, E. & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16, 143-155.
Narin, F. & Olivastro, D. (1993). Patent citation cycles. Library Trends, 41(4), 700-709.
Narin, F., Olivastro, D. & Stevens, K. A. (1994). Bibliometric/theory practice and problems. Evaluation Review, 18(1), 65-76.
Narin, Francis, Pinski, G.abriel & Gee, Helen Hofer (1976). Structure of the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Jan.-Feb, 25-45
Nath, Ravinder & Jackson, Wade M. (1991). Productivity of management information systems researchers: does Lotka’s law apply? Information Processing and Management, 27(2/3), 203-209.
Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: a review of literature II. Libri, 46, 217-225.
Owen-Smith, Jason & Powell, Walter W. (2003). The expanding role of university patenting in the life science: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy, 32(9), 1695-1711
Owen-Smith, Jason & Powell, Walter W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5-21.
Owen-Smith, Jason, Riccaboni, Massimo, Pammolli, Fabio & Powell, Walter W. (2002). A comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science, 48(1), 24-43.
Pandit, I. (1993). Citation errors in library literature: a study of five library science journals. Library & Information Science Research, 15(2), 185-198.
Pavitt, K. (1998). Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7(2), 105-111.
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.
Peter, H. P. F., Braam, R. R. & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1995). Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(1), 9-21.
Pierce, S. J. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 271-9.
Pinski, G. & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: theory with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12(5), 297-312.
Polanco, X., Francois, C. & Keim, J. P. (1998). Artificial neural network technology for the classification and cartography of scientific and technical information. Scientometrics, 41(1-2), 69-82.
Potter, W. G. (1981). Introduction of bibliometrics. Library Trends, 30(1), 5-7.
Prasad, Alka & Visalakshi, Srinivasan (2000). Trends and profile in enzyme engineering research during 1971-1998. Scientometrics, 48(1): 27-44.
Pravdic, N. & Oluic-Vukovic,V. (1986). Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration. Scientometrics, 10(5-6), 259-280.
Price, D. J. de S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 358-359.
Pritchard, A. (1972). Bibiliometrics and information transfer. Research Librarianship, 4, 89.
Qin, J. (1999) Discovering semantic patterns in bibliographically coupled documents. Library Trends, 48(1), 109-32.
Radhakrishnan, T. & Kernizan, R. (1979). Lotka’s law and computer science literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30(1), 51-54.
Raisig, L.M. (1960). Mathematical evaluation of the scientific serial: improved bibliographic method offers new objectivity in selecting and abstracting the research journal. Science, 131, 1417-1419.
Ramani, Shyama V. & Looze, Marie-Angele de (2002). Using patent statistics as knowledge base indicators in the biotechnology sector: an application to France, Germany and the U.K. Scientometrics, 54(3), 319-346.
Rip, A. & Courtial, J. (1984). Co-word maps of biotechnology: an example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics, 6(6), 381-400.
Roosendaal, H. E. & Geurts, P. A. TH. M. (1999). Scientific communication and its relevance to research policy. Scientometrics, 44(3), 507-519.
Rowlands, I. (1999). Patterns of author cocitation in information policy: evidence of social, collaborative and cognitive structure. Scientometrics, 44(3), 533-546.
Salton, G. (1971). Automatic indexing using bibliographic citations. Journal of Documentation, 27(2), 98-110.
Sandison, A. (1989). Documentation note: thinking about citation analysis. The Journal of Documentation, 45(1), 59-64.
Scharnhorst, A. (1998).Citation - networks, science landscapes and evolutionary strategies. Scientometrics, 43(1), 95-106.
Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 73-100.
Schmoch, U. (1993). Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26(1), 193-211.
Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 38(1), 103-116.
Schwartz, C. A. (1997). The rise and fall of uncitedness. College & Research Libraries, 58(1), 19-29.
Schwechiheimer, H. & Winterhager, M. (1999). Highly dynamic specialties in climate research. Scientometrics, 44(3), 547-560.
Seglen, P. O. (1994). Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1): 1-11.
Sengupta, I. N. (1985). The growth of biophysical literature. Scientometrics, 8(5/6), 365-375.
Sengupta, I. N. (1992). Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: an overview. Libri, 12(2), 75-98.
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 24(3), 265-269.
Small, H. (1998). Citations and consilience in science – comments on theories of citation? Scientometircs, 43(1), 143-148.
Small, H. (1999a) A passage through science: crossing disciplinary boundaries. Library Trends, 48 (1), 72-108.
Small, H. (1999b). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
Small, H. & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
Small, H. G. & Sweeney, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citation I: a comparison of methods. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 391-409.
Smith, H. (1980). Cocitation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183-196.
Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
Sopher, M. E. (1976). Characteristics and use of personal collections. Library Quarterly, 46(3), 397-415.
Strawhorn, J. M. (1981). Word processing and publishing. Scholarly Publishing, 12(2), 109-121.
Subramanyam, K. (1976). Core journals in computer science. IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, PC 19(2), 22-25.
Subramanyam, K. (1979). Lotka’s law and the literature of computer science. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC 22(4), 180-187.
Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38.
Subramanyam, K. & Stephens, E. M. (1982). Research collaboration and funding in biochemistry and chemical engineering. International Forum on Information and Documentation, 7(4). 26-29.
Tijssen, R. J. W. & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1990). Net citation balances: a measure of influence between scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(4), 298-304.
Tijssen, Robert J.W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30: 35-54.
Tomov, D. T. & Mutafov, H. G. (1996). Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37(2), 267-278.
Trivison, D. (1987). Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity. Information Processing & Management, 23, 183-194.
Tsai, Ming-yueh (2004). Literature growth, journal characteristics, and author productivity in subject indexing, 1977 to 2000. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 64-73.
Tsai, Ming-yueh, Jou, S-J & Ma, S-S (2000). A bibliometric study of semiconductor literature, 1978-1997. Scientometrics, 49(3), 491-509.
Van Bergeijk, D. & Risseeuw, M. (1980). The international translations center: the language barrier in the dissemination of scientific information and the role of the ITC. Journal of Information Science, 2(1), 37-42.
Viannen, B. G. Van, Moed, H. F. & Raan, A. F. J. Van (1990). An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Science Policy, 19, 61-81.
Voos, H. & Dagaev, K. S. (1976). Are all citations equal: or, did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librairanship, 1(6), 19-21.
Wagner-Dobler, R. & Berg, J. (1995). The dependence of Lotka’s law on the selection of time periods in the development of scientific areas and authors. Journal of Documentation, 51(1), 28-43.
Weinberg, B. H. (1974). Bibliographic coupling: a review. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(5/6), 189-196.
White, H. D. & Griffith, B.C. (1981). Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
White, H.D. & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline an author co-citation analysis of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4): 327-355.
Wilson, C. S. (1999). Using online databases to form subject collections for informetric analyses. Scientometrics, 46(3), 647-667.
Winstanley, M. (1976). Assimilation into the literature of a critical advance in molecular biology. Social Studies of Science, 6, 545-549.
Xhignesse, L. & Osgood, C. (1967). Bibliographic citation characteristics of the psychological journal network in 1950 and 1960. American Psychologist, 22, 778-791.
Zipp, L. S. (1999) Core serial titles in an interdisciplinary field: the case of environmental geology. Library Resources & Technical Services, 43(1), 28-36.
Zitt, M. & Bassecoulard, E. (1998). Internationalization of scientific journals: a measurement based on publication and citation scope. Scientometrics, 41(1-2), 255-271.
Zucker, Lynne G., Darby, Michael R. & Amstrong, Jeff (1998). Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65-86.
Zucker, Lynne G., Darby, Michael R. & Amstrong, Jeff S. (2002). Commercialize knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance biotechnology. Management Science, 48(1), 138-153.
Zuckerman, H. A. (1967). Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 391-403.
Zuckerman, H. & Merton, R. K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system. Mineva, 9(1), 66-100.