:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多目標決策在空氣污染評估之應用
書刊名:環境與管理研究
作者:張慶暉黃瀞誼林志娟
作者(外文):Chang, Ching-huiHwang, Ching-yiLin, Jyh-jiuan
出版日期:2006
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁31-47
主題關鍵詞:空氣污染指標多目標決策灰關聯分析Pollutant standards IndexPSIMultiple objective decision makingGrey relational analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:6
日益嚴重的空氣污染問題已影響了大自然的生態平衡,而對人類的生活也產生了一定的影響。隨著各地區工業化與都市化的不同,空氣污染的程度亦有所差異,所以在本研究中,以臺灣22個縣市為研究地區,並使用空氣污染指標(pollutant standards index ; PSI)中的懸浮微粒、二氧化硫、一氧化碳、臭氧和二氧化氮五種污染物為污程程度判斷的依據。本研究主要是以多目標決策中五種不同權重取法,來探討臺灣各縣市空氣污染的情形,也就是各項指標數據以平均法、準差法、CRITIC法(Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation)、熵值權重法及灰關聯分析,來取得權重後,再經加權計算而求得綜合指標值,同時依據綜合指標數值的高低比較各縣市空氣污染的嚴重情形,最後將上述五種分析方法與傳統PSI指標方法所得的結果比較,並探討之間的相關性,實證結果顯示在22個研究的縣市當中污染最嚴重的三大縣市為高雄市,高雄縣及嘉義市,最不嚴重的三大縣市則為臺東縣、宜蘭縣及新竹縣。
The air pollution is getting more and more serious and has affected the balance of the natural environment, and this will also have a serious impact on human life. According to the different degrees of industrialization and urbanization in different areas, the degrees of air pollution will not be the same. In this research twenty-two counties have been studied for those pollutants (suspended substances, □, □, □, □ and □) to indicate the degree of air pollution. Given these five environmental indicators, we will try to integrate these indicators and derive a single overall index. The ways to decide the weights includes Mean weight, Standard Deviation weight, CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation), Entropy method and Grey Relational analysis. Furthermore, the condition of air pollution will be compared in every county according to the aggregate index. Finally, the five methods are compared with the traditional Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) and the correlations among them are discussed.
期刊論文
1.Diakoulak, D.、Mavrotas, G.、Papayannakis, L.(1995)。Determing objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method。Computers & Operations Research,22(7),763-770。  new window
2.Koopmans, T. C.(1951)。Analaysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities。Activity Analysis of Production and Alloction,33-97。  new window
3.Deng, Ju-long(1989)。Introduction to Grey System Theory。The Journal of Grey System,1(1),1-24。  new window
4.林志娟、劉家佑、張慶暉、林秋華(20050900)。理想解類似度偏好順序評估方法之及延伸其應用。中國統計學報,43(3),313-336。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Deng, Hepu、Yeh, Chung-Hsing、Willis, Robert J.(2000)。Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights。Computers & Operations Research,27(10),963-973。  new window
會議論文
1.Kuhn, H.、Tucker, A.(1951)。Nonlinear programming。The 2nd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probabilistic。Berkeley, CA:University of California Press。481-492。  new window
研究報告
1.Sinha, B. K.(2003)。Combining Environmental Indicators。Baltimore County:Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Maryland。  new window
圖書
1.溫坤禮、黃宜豊、張偉哲、張廷政、游美利、賴家瑞(2003)。灰關聯模型方法與應用。臺北:高立圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.Iriji, Y.(1965)。Management Goals and Accounting for Control。Amsterdam:North-Holland。  new window
3.Hwang, C. L.、Yoon, K.(1981)。Multiple Attribute Decision MakingrMethods and Applications。New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
4.Shannon, C. E.、Weaver, W.(1947)。The Mathematical Theory of Communication。Urbana, IL:The University of Illinois Press。  new window
5.許志義(1994)。多目標決策。臺北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE