:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣筆記型電腦產業經營績效之研究--資料包絡法(DEA)及Malmquist生產力指數方法之應用
書刊名:華人經濟研究
作者:梁榮輝 引用關係方顯光 引用關係邱金昌
出版日期:2006
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁98-120
主題關鍵詞:資料包絡法生產力變動指數筆記型電腦技術效率差額變數敏感性分析Data envelopment analysisMalmquist productivity indexNetebookTechnical efficiencySlack variableSensitivity analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
隨著全球筆記型電腦的需求量持續增加,各廠家紛紛投入擴充生產線,導致產能過剩,削價競爭遂變成解決生產過剩的唯一解決之道。台灣筆記型電腦廠商正面臨著極其關鍵的轉捩點,如何建立及維持其競爭優勢,為台灣筆記型電腦廠商必須正視的主義趣。故此,本研究將以2001~2004年間台灣地區筆記型電腦產黨廠商之經營效率進行探討,並利用產業特性與其經營效率之關聯,以利筆記型電腦產業之廠商評估技術效率、純粹技術效率與規模效率,做為廠商經營決策與相關單位在衡量反制定之參考依據。因而本文採用資料包絡法(DEA)與生產力變動指數(MPI)衡量筆記型電腦廠商的經營績效。實證結果顯示,就效率而言,技術效率值愈高,表示其對於投入要素能有效的被運用,以達到產出極大化的目標。就效率變動而言,2001~2004年間生產力有成長的家數為15家,下滑的家數有6家。就差額變數及敏感性分析而言,國內地區筆記型電腦產業多為員工人數過多,而造成無形的浪費,且從本研究分析得知,固定資產這項因素對國內筆記電腦產業的影響最鉅。
According to situation of the global notebook demand is increasing, every manufactory expands their product lines in order to meet this requirement. However, it results in excess of notebook production, and price reduced becomes the only one method to solve this problem. How to build and maintain the competitive advantage is becoming the important issue for Taiwan notebook companies right now. Therefore, this research discusses the operation efficiency among these all Taiwan notebook companies from 2001 to 2004. Furthermore, for companies make the operation efficiency and related units to set up the efficiency target, they will take the technical efficiency, the pure technical efficiency, and the scale efficiency into account. So, we will use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) to measure the efficiency of notebook industry in Taiwan. Since the result indicates when input factors are managed efficiently, that will generate the higher technical efficiency value. And, that will achieve the target of the output maximum as well. O e operation efficiency of notebook companies. n the part of the efficiency variable, 15 companies grew their productivity from 2001 to 2004, and 6 companies decreased at that moment. In the point of the slack variable and the sensitivity analysis, the reason for invisible waste is over hiring employees in domestic notebook companies. In addition, from this research, we can find that fixed assets are the most important element to affect the domestic notebook industry.
期刊論文
1.Charnes, A.、Neralic, L.(1989)。Sensitivity Analysis in Data Envelop Analysis。Glasnik Mathematicki,24(44),221-226。  new window
2.Burki, A. A.、Terrell, D.(1998)。Measuring production efficiency of small firms in Pakistan。World Development,26(1),155-169。  new window
3.Thore, S.、Kozmetsky, G.、Phillips, F.(1994)。DEA of financial statements data: The U.S. computer industry。Journal of Productivity Analysis,5(3),229-248。  new window
4.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.、Rhodes, E.(1978)。Measurement the Efficiency of Decision Making Units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
5.Ferrier, G. D.、Valdmanis, V.(1996)。Rural Hospital Performance and Its Correlates。The Journal of Productivity Analysis,7(1),63-80。  new window
6.Charnes, A.、Cooper, William W.(1984)。The non-Archim-edian C C R Ratio for Efficiency Analysis: A Rejoinder to Body and Fare。International European Journal of Operational Research,15,333-334。  new window
7.Farrell, M. J.(1957)。The Measurement of Productive Efficimcy。Journal of Royal Statistical Society,20,253-581。  new window
8.Mahajan, Jayashree(1991)。A data envelopment analytic model for assessing the relative efficiency of the selling function。European Journal of Operational Research,53(2),189-205。  new window
9.Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.(1962)。Programming with linear fractional functionals。Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,9(3/4),181-186。  new window
10.Caves, D. W.、Christensen, L. R.、Diewert, W. E.(1982)。Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers。The Economic Journal,92(365),73-86。  new window
11.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
12.Caves, Douglas W.、Christensen, Laurits R.、Diewert, W. Erwin(1982)。The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity。Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,50(6),1393-1414。  new window
學位論文
1.王儀菁(2005)。筆記型電腦新產品導入運籌績效與因子之探討(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李岳玲(1998)。我國資訊產業筆記型電腦外銷關係行銷之研究(碩士論文)。大同工學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪渭雯(2004)。台灣光碟片產業經營效率之評估--DEA分析法之應用(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.姜玉苹(2003)。供應鏈管理績效評估模式之設計--以筆記型電腦產業為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.孫學民(2003)。供應鏈流程之六標準差交期績效模式之構建--以筆記型電腦業為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳穆瑢(1999)。高科技產業人力資源管理之研究及筆記型電腦廠商標竿之建立(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳瑞敏(1998)。台灣筆記型電腦產業分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃俊達(2005)。亞洲地區半導體晶圓代工產業效率之研究--資料包絡分析法之應用(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.馮秀鳳(2002)。半導體產業經營效率之研究--資料包絡分析法之應用(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡明昌(2004)。筆記型電腦消費者購買行為與市場區隔之研究--以三大都會區為例(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.彭啟峰(2002)。企業導入ERP員工行為模式分析--以筆記型電腦業為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭東杰(2003)。以資料包絡分析法探討影響企業經營績效關鍵因素--以發光二極體產業為例(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.賴文玲(2005)。我國TFT-LCD產業經營效率之研究--以資料包絡法分析(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.謝美雀(2005)。應用資料包絡分析法之光電產業生產系統生產力實證研究(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.黃筱潔(2004)。台灣半導體產業生產效率之實證研究--以資料包絡模式分析(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.洪淑娟(2003)。筆記型電腦產業之經營效率-以資料包絡法分析(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
17.黃金祥(2002)。DEA方法之產業效率與產業發展策略的實證分析--以光電產業為例(碩士論文)。義守大學。  延伸查詢new window
18.劉信宏(2000)。以AHP模式進行人力資源管理項目之評估--以筆記型電腦業為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.資策會(2005)。打造行動新世界--筆記型電腦產品與市場趨勢徹底剖析。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shephard, R. W.(1970)。Theory of Cost and Production Function。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fare, R.、Grosskopf, S.、Lindgren, B.、Roos, P.(1989)。Productivity Development in。Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top