:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從幼兒身心發展觀點探討幼兒玩具設計要素之研究
書刊名:應用藝術與設計學報
作者:郭春在
作者(外文):Guo, Chuen-tzay
出版日期:2006
卷期:1
頁次:頁53-62
主題關鍵詞:幼兒身心發展幼兒玩具設計兒童玩具Development of infant childrenToy'sToy design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:280
本研究旨在依幼兒身心發展特質探討幼兒玩具設計之構想要素,藉由幼托之教保人員之教育認知,對幼兒玩具之實際使用教導、玩具使用時機、教育功能認知,幼兒對玩具使用之適應性進行資料蒐集調查分析,並應用SPSS統計軟體進行分析研究。研究結果發現:一、大多數教保人員均同意每天都安排給幼兒玩玩具時間、玩具要由幼兒自己選擇,但教保人員較不同意把玩具當獎品。二、大學畢業之教保人員每天給幼兒玩玩具的時間多於專科畢業者;而高中職畢業之教保人員認為玩具是幼兒長期必須者多於專科畢業者。三、教保人員均同意幼兒玩具對幼兒之身體動作、語言能力、認知能力、社交能力、創造能力、感官知覺等發展都甚有幫助,及玩具能養成幼兒良好習慣,且很有娛樂價值。四、教保人員認為好的玩具應具備的要素中,前六項依序為:1.具安全性,2.益智性,3.能激發創造力,4.符合孩子的年齡,5.符合孩子的興趣,6.持久耐用。五、教保人員認為選購幼兒玩具時,應注意的事項,前六項依序為:1.具安全性,2.益智性,3.符合幼兒興趣,4.符合年齡,5.可以常清洗,6.持久耐用。六、教保人員認為最適合幼兒的玩具,前五種分別為:1.組合式積木,2.樂高組合玩具,3.拼圖,4.雪花片,5.扮家家酒玩具。而教保人員認為最不適合幼兒的玩具,前五種依序為:1.武器類(包含槍、劍、刀和尖銳物品),2.絨布娃娃,3.彈珠,4.電動式玩具,5.組合式機器人。七、教保人員認為最能引起幼兒興趣的玩具,前六種依序為,1.積木,2.扮家家酒,3.拼圖,4.雪花片,5.樂高,6.黏土。八、歸納研究發現:幼兒玩具設計時之構想要素、以及選購幼兒玩具時,除了要考量幼兒身心發展特質及幼兒玩具是否具有啟發幼兒創造力、益智性及安全性等功能外,玩具材質是否可以常清洗、持久耐用、與不會過小、容易脫落或劣質塑膠製品等,亦是設計或選購時應納入考量之要素。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the conceptive elements of the toys designing on the characteristics of physical and mental development of infant children. Furthermore the research focus on the analysis of the timing of the infant children' toys, the cognition of educational functions of the infant children' toys, and adaptability of the infant children' toys by care-givers. The data were analyzed with SPSS. The findings were as follows: 1. Most of care-givers agree that planning the playing toys' time on everyday schedule, toys is long-term requirement for infant children, as well as the infant children choose the toys. 2. the care-givers who have undergraduate degree offer more playing toys' time to the infant children than the ones who graduate from college, also the care-givers who graduate from high school argue that the toys is long-term necessity for infant children more than the ones who graduate from college. 3. All care-givers consent that the toys of the infant children have fairly benefits to the infant children on their physical movements, lingual abilities, cognitive abilities, social abilities, creative abilities, and sense perceptions. Besides, the toys can cultivate the good manners of the infant children; they also have great value of entertainment. 4. The care-givers conceive the good toys should possess certain qualifications, the former six elements in sequence as follows: (1) safety (2) advancing resource (3) inspiring creativity (4) conforming to children' interests (6) permanence and wear. 5. The care-givers think that there were some circumstances should pay attentions when purchase the infant children' toys, the former six conditions in sequence as follows: (1) safe (2) nimble (3) could cohere with the infant children' interests (5) could answer to ages (5) could cleanse frequently (6) endurable. 6. The care-givers hold the former five most suitable toys of the infant children respectively were (1) built-up block (2) LEGO associate toys (3) jigsaw puzzle (4) snowflake piece (5) role play toys. Moreover, the care-givers consider the former five most unsuitable toys of the infant children respectively were (1) weaponry (including guns, swords, knives, and incisive stuff) (2) downy dolls (3) marbles (4) electric toys (5) associate robots. 7. The care-givers argue the former six toys that the most bring about the infant children's interests according to the statistics respectively were (1) block (2) role play toys (3) jigsaw puzzle (4) snowflake piece (5) LEGO (6) clay. 8. generalization the findings of this study were: both the conceptive elements of the toys designing and purchasing the infant children's toys not only t6ake into account the characteristics of physical and mental development of infant children; whether the toys possess the functions to illuminate children' creativity, advancing resource, and safety but also give a thought to the material of the toys whether they could wee washed frequently, endurable, suitable size, fixed, and quality of things.
期刊論文
1.江麗莉(19930500)。幼兒玩具研究文獻探討。幼兒教育學報,2,61-76。  延伸查詢new window
2.(199708)。關於安全玩具的小常識。育兒生活雜誌,119-121。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳美玲、吳婉宜(19970700)。幼兒玩具設計與教育功能設計之探索--以色彩教育為例。工業設計,26(3)=98,153-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳鳳卿、王紹媛(200305)。選擇幼兒玩具的七大考量。育兒生活雜誌,172-175。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭靜晃(2002)。適齡玩物的選擇。蒙特梭利月刊,32,10-13。  延伸查詢new window
6.賀慧玲、簡淑真、許勝雄(1993)。幼兒玩具選擇偏好研究。家政教育季刊,12(3),76-86。  延伸查詢new window
7.Dansky, J. L.、Silverman, I. W.(1973)。Effects of play on associative fluency in preschool-aged children。Developmental Psychology,9,38-43。  new window
8.Quay, L. C.、Weaver, J. H.、Neel, J. H.(1986)。Teffects of play materials on Position and negative social behaviors in Preschool boys and girls。Child study journal,16,67-76。  new window
9.秦自強(19920500)。學前兒童玩具設計要素評斷研究。明志工專學報,24,97-122。  延伸查詢new window
10.徐澄清、徐梅屏(19860300)。從遊戲中學習。健康世界,3=123,46-49。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳昌祚、羅仕良(2002)。以TRIZ輔助兒童玩具之設計。台北科技大學創新研究所第一屆設計研討會,296-300。  延伸查詢new window
2.林振陽、楊基昌、陳建男(2003)。玩具設計對教學效益影響之研究。兩岸地方產業特色與產品設計教育學術研討會,500-507。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳美玲、吳婉宜(1998)。學齡前幼兒玩具設計與色彩教育之研究--以教育性玩具為例。第三屆設計研討會,669。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.信宜基金會(1991)。學前兒童身心發展特質與玩具需求相關要素探討。台北:信誼基金會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王金傳(2004)。益智型玩具設計之探討--以組合式玩具為例(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳健樟(2002)。應用兒童知識介入兒童身心發展玩具設計開發之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林振陽(1996)。學前兒童益智玩具設計與方法之建立。國立成功大學工業設計研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.張春興(2001)。心理學。台北:東華。  延伸查詢new window
3.陽琬(2004)。學前教育。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉惠盈、張競云、溫韻香、林智敏(2003)。父母選購幼兒玩具偏好之調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich、Cole, Michael、John-Steiner, Vera、Scribner, Sylvia、Souberman, Ellen、Luria, A. R.、Lopez-Morillas, M.、Wertsch, James V.(1978)。Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
其他
1.陳健樟(2001)。生活型態與設計行為之互動關係研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳殿禮(2001)。仿生造型應用在家具設計教學上之研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Bradley, R. H.(1985)。Play materials and intellectual development。play Interactions: The role of toy and parental involvement in children’s development Skillman。NJ:Johnson & Johnson。  new window
2.Piaget, J.(1971)。The theory of Stages in Cognitive development。Measurement and Piaget。New York:Mc Graw-Hill。  new window
3.吳怡靜(2000)。關鍵窗口幼兒如何學習?。從零歲開始。台北:天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top