:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
本文主要在探討網路資源備份保存之必要性;透過國外網路資源保存之實例,介紹相關技術實務與合作規劃,並說明同時保存網路上「開放式資源」與「閉鎖式資源」之重要性。進而實際使用國外保存網路資源機構InternetArchive之資料庫,以測試臺灣各類機構網路資源備份保存之 Internet Archive 之資料庫,以測試臺灣各類機構網路資源備份保存之之資料庫,以測試臺灣各類機構網路資源備份保存之狀況,藉以了解網路資源本身結構對於完整備份保存之影響。網路資源製作上的規劃,與其是否得以被完整備份保存,關係密切。而網路資源本身之Metadata又將影響自動化編目的可行性與正確性,而間接影響備份保存Metadata又將影響自動化編目的可行性與正確性,而間接影響備份保存又將影響自動化編目的可行性與正確性,而間接影響備份保存之資料的提供利用。因此,本文試圖涵蓋網路資源保存上必須列入考量的因素,包括網路資源建置端,以及專為備份保存網路資源而設立之網站機構端雙方所需的努力;期能喚起注意、引發相關計畫之執行,並促成臺灣網路資源本身結構之改善,裨益數位文化資產之保存以及其長久可即性。
This article discusses the purposes , necessary planning and techniques for Web preservation. The author addresses the importance of preserving Internet resources both on open access and close access. By exploring some Web preservation examples of other countries, the author points out some strategies for technical practice and collaborative approach. Besides, the author works on searches of Taiwan’s webpages of different kinds of institutions in the Internet Archive WayBack Machine to find out how Taiwan’s Web resources had been archived. The investigation showes that structure of a website, as well as design of webpages contained in it, is crucial for whether or not the website could be completely archived. Furthermore, the metadata information attached to a webpage is used for automated cataloging for its archival version and will indirectly influence users’ search. Since a successful Web preservation task is due to good planning by both the information producer and the archival institution, the author tries to cover the issue concerning Web resources cataloging and the necessary effort by the Web information producer. It is hoped that the information and suggestions of this paper will evoke attention, solicit the enforcement of related activities so as to ensure the long-term preservation and usability of digital cultural heritages of the nation.
期刊論文
1.項潔、洪筱盈(20051200)。臺灣機構典藏發展芻議。教育資料與圖書館學,43(2),173-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.National Research Council(2000)。A Digital Strategy for the Library of Congress。A Digital Strategy for the Library of Congress。Washington, D. C.。  new window
2.National Research Council(2000)。The Digital Dilemma, Intellectual Property in the Information Age。The Digital Dilemma, Intellectual Property in the Information Age。Washington, D. C.。  new window
3.Wilson, Patrick(1968)。Introduction。Two Kinds of Power: An Essay on Bibliographical Control。Berkeley。  new window
其他
1.Chisholm, W.,Vanderheiden, G.,Jacobs, I.(19990505)。Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0,http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/, 2003/04/01。  new window
2.Universal Access to Human Knowledge。  new window
3.The Library of Congress。About MINERVA。  new window
4.Arms, B,LC Web Preservation Project Team(2001)。LC’s Web Preservation Project: a Pilot for Selecting, Collecting, Cataloging, and Accessing Archived Websites: PPT, at Mumford Room, Madison Building。  new window
5.National Library of Australia。Web Archiving。  new window
6.LOCKSS: About。  new window
7.The Library of Congress(2003)。Collections Policy Statement: Web Site Capture and Archiving。  new window
8.Commission on Preservation and Access and Research Libraries Group(1996)。Preserving Digital Information: Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information。  new window
9.National Library of Australia。PADI: Preserving Access to Digital Information。  new window
10.National Library of Sweden。Kulturarw3- Long Time Preservation of Electronic Documents。  new window
11.National Library of Australia and Partners。PANDORA: Australia’s Web Archive。  new window
12.Arms, William Y.(2001)。A Report to the Library of Congress: Web Preservation Project, Interim Report。  new window
13.Goebel, Christan(2003)。Taiwan’s Democratic Consolidation, 2000 – 2001。  new window
14.Arms, William Y.。Coalition for Networked Information: Preserving the Open Access Web。  new window
15.MINERVA: September 11 Web Archive- About。  new window
16.Internet Archive: Home。  new window
17.107th Congress Web Archive, About: Selection Criteria。  new window
18.Phillips, Margaret。PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive, and the Digital Archiving System that Supports It。  new window
19.HTTrack Website Copier。  new window
20.MINERVA: Metadata Component。  new window
21.Policy and Practice Statement: Collecting Policy。  new window
22.MIT Libraries。Dspace。  new window
23.Lund University Libraries。Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)。  new window
24.項潔。臺大博碩士論文資料庫建置計畫。  延伸查詢new window
25.中文電子學位論文服務:瀏覽說明。  延伸查詢new window
26.Elektra - Finnish Scientific Publications in Electronic Form。  new window
27.University of Nottingham, UK. SHERPA: Home。  new window
28.The Directory of Open Access Repositories – OpenDOAR。  new window
29.JISC. UK LOCKSS Pilot Programme。  new window
30.LOCKSS: Publishers and Titles - Electronic Journals Released for Collection and Preservation。  new window
31.LOCKSS: LOCKSS Alliance。  new window
32.LOCKSS: News Archive (6/23/06)。  new window
33.CLOCKSS: Home - About CLOCKSS。  new window
34.CLOCKSS: Home - Participating Members of CLOCKSS。  new window
35.CLOCKSS: Library of Congress Announces Digital Preservation Award to Stanford University。  new window
36.UK LOCKSS Pilot Programme。  new window
37.Internet Archive: About AI。  new window
38.The History of A-Prompt。  new window
39.Muisti-project for Digitization and Network Delivery of the Finnish National Collection。  new window
40.Internet Archive: WayBack Machine- Advanced Search。  new window
41.About LOCKSS。  new window
42.About LOCKSS: Team。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE