:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:身心障礙者職業輔導評量標準化測驗之測驗調整探討
書刊名:臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌
作者:李佩秦王敏行 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Peggy PeichinWang, Ming Hung
出版日期:2006
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁57-64
主題關鍵詞:職業輔導評量測驗調整身心障礙者心理計量Vocational evaluationTest accommodationPeople with disabilitiesProfessional ethicsPsychometrics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:15
“身心障礙者職業輔導評量辦法”明文規定身心障礙者在接受職業輔導評量時,得依其身心障礙者之障礙類型、障礙程度調整評量過程和工具之選用,或是提供相關服務措施。常見之測驗調整為調整測驗的內容與呈現方式、調整測驗反應方式、及調整測驗環境等三類。然而測驗調整後之施測情境與程序的差異,可能使得標準化測驗的心理計量特性受到考驗,原測驗之信度、效度、及公平性將受到質疑。本文將探討職業輔導評量中,標準化測驗之測驗調整以及心理計量特性的相關議題,並提出對於未來職業輔導評量實務工作及研究之建議。
The Vocational Rehabilitation Assessment Regulation (1998) mandated the use of appropriate test accommodation strategies when administering vocational assessment for people with disabilities. Decisions about test accommodation need to take several factors into consideration, such as types of disabilities and levels of functions. Strategies of test accommodation include alteration of test contexts, procedures or formats. However, any deviations from the standard test administration might hinder the reliability, validity and fairness of the tests. This article will review the issues of test accommodation and psychometrics in the administration of standardized tests. Implications for clinical practice and further research in vocational evaluation are suggested.
期刊論文
1.Willingham, W. W.(1989)。Standard testing conditions and standard score meaning for handicapped examinees。Applied Measurement in Education,2,97-103。  new window
2.Geisinger, K. F.(1994)。Psychometric issues in testing students with disabilities。Applied Measurement in Education,7,121-140。  new window
3.Nester, M. A.(1993)。Psychometric testing and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities。Rehabilitation Psychology,38,75-85。  new window
4.Rock, D. A.、Bennett, R. E.、Jirele, T.(1988)。Factor structure of the Graduate Record Examinations General Test in handicapped and nonhandicapped groups。Journal of Applied Psychology,73,383-392。  new window
圖書
1.教育部(1997)。特殊教育法。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院勞委會(1998)。身心障礙者職業輔導評量辦法。台北:行政院勞委會。  延伸查詢new window
3.中國測驗學會(1999)。通用性向測驗指導手冊。台北:行政院勞委會職業訓練局。  延伸查詢new window
4.王敏行、吳明宜、陳靜江、賴淑華、戴富嬌(2003)。身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊。台北:行政院勞委會職業訓練局。  延伸查詢new window
5.王敏行(2004)。身心障礙者職業輔導評量專業人員訓練課程標準規劃書。台北:行政院勞委會職業訓練局。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳靜江、吳裕益、王敏行、蘇純瑩、吳明宜(2004)。本土化身心障礙者工作樣本評量工具之研發(二)--信效度建立。台北:行政院勞委會勞工安全衛生研究所。  延伸查詢new window
7.Ziomek, R. L.、Andrews, K. M.(1998)。ACT assessment score gains of special-tested students who tested at least twice。Iowa City:ACT。  new window
8.Tindal, G.、Fuchs, L.(2000)。A summary of research on test changes: An empirical basis for defining accommodations。Kentucky:Mid-South Regional Resources Center, University of Kentucky。  new window
9.Ziomek, R. L.、Andrews, K. M.(1996)。Predicting the college grade point averages of special-tested students from their ACT assessment scores and high school grades。Iowa City:ACT。  new window
10.Gregory, R. J.(2004)。Psychological testing: History, principle, and applications。New York:Pearson Education Group。  new window
11.American Psychological Association、American Educational Research Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
12.Power, P. W.(2000)。A guide to vocational assessment。Austin:Pro-ed。  new window
其他
1.American Counseling Association(2005)。ACA codes of ethics,http://www.counseling.org/Content/ NavigationMenu/RESOURCES/ETHICS/ACA_Code_of_Ethics.htm, 2005/06/18。  new window
圖書論文
1.Behuniak, P.(2002)。Types of commonly requested accommodations。Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
2.Braun, H.、Rogosta, M.、Kaplan, B.(1988)。Predictive validity。Testing handicapped people。Needham Heights:Ally and Bacon。  new window
3.Sireci, S. G.、Geisinger, K. R.(1998)。Equity issues in employment testing。Test interpretation and diversity: Achieving equity in assessment。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
4.Smith, D. K.(2002)。The decision-making process for developing testing accommodations。Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment, and counseling settings。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
5.Noble, J. P.、Camara, W.、Fremer, J.(2002)。Postsecondary admissions testing。Assessing individuals with disabilities in educational, employment,and counseling settings。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE