:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:當審理遇上諮商:「治療性審理」抑或「審理性治療」?
書刊名:應用心理研究
作者:林方皓
作者(外文):Lin, Fang-hao
出版日期:2006
卷期:32
頁次:頁74-80
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:29
期刊論文
1.陳金燕(20021200)。諮商人與法律人的對話:當諮商師碰上檢察官、法官與律師時。輔導季刊,38(4),1-5。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cortina, L. M.(2002)。Symposium introduction: The study of gender in the courts: Keeping bias at bay。Law & Social Inquity,27(2),199-204。  new window
3.Lonsway, K. A., Freeman, L. V., Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J. and Fitzgerald, L.F.(2002)。Understanding the judicial role in addressing gender bias: A view from the Eighth Circuit Federal Court System。Law & Social Inquiry,27(2),205-234。  new window
會議論文
1.賴月蜜(2004)。家事商談制度之介紹。家事商談研討會。台北:內政部統計處兒童局。14-50。  延伸查詢new window
2.王智宏、唐訢雅、廖婉喻、蘇盈儀(2005)。〈家事商談(家事調解)的倫理議題〉。台南市。  延伸查詢new window
3.周小玲(2006)。〈香港家事調解實務守則〉。台南市。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭麗安、李星謙、王唯馨(2005)。家事調解的實踐和反思。2005家事調解國際研討會。  延伸查詢new window
5.彭南元(2006)。〈家事調解之工作模式一以家事法庭調解法官整合心理衛生專業服務為例〉。台南市。  延伸查詢new window
6.謝靜慧(2006)。〈探尋家事調解的新方向:以台北市士林地方法院家事法庭調解經驗出發〉。台南市。  延伸查詢new window
7.Scotto, D(2006)。Domestic violence law in the United States: Roles of judges, prosecutors and lawyers。  new window
圖書
1.司法院(2005)。《地方法院實施家事事件調解要點》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Sarat, A.、Keams, T. R.(1992)。A journey though forgetting: Toward a jurisprudence of violence,。Amherst Series in Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought。Ann Arbor。  new window
3.Sarat, A.、Keams, T. R.(1999)。Visions of fact, language of evidence, history, memory, and the trauma of legal research。Amherst Series in Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought。Ann Arbor。  new window
4.Schafran, L. H.(1998)。The limits of law Reform: What really happens in the courtroom。Women in law。London。  new window
5.Siegel(1999)。Collective memory and the Nineteenth Amendment: Reasoning about ‘the Woman question’ in the discourse of sex discrimination。Amherst Series in Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought。Ann Arbor。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top