:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:助人專業合作的鏡映與省思:從社工師觀點看諮商心理師於學校輔導場域的專業實踐
書刊名:輔導與諮商學報
作者:游以安姜兆眉 引用關係
作者(外文):Yu, Yi-anChiang, Chao-mei
出版日期:2017
卷期:38:2
頁次:頁53-73
主題關鍵詞:諮商心理師社工師學校輔導工作專業合作Counseling psychologistsSocial workerSchool guidanceProfessional collaboration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:101
  • 點閱點閱:14
本研究訪談七位學校社工師,探討諮商心理師在縣市「學生輔導諮商中心」的專業實踐樣貌。研究結果:一、在學校系統,諮商心理師相對於社工師佔有優勢,能被學校系統認同;然,諮商心理師/社會工作師與學校輔導人員角色權責難以劃分。二、專業合作中的諮商心理師,擅長個案內在心理議題分析與概念化,但對家庭工作及資源連結能力有限。另,具系統觀點之心理師較能在專業合作上溝通、與社工師能相互協力者可提升效能,與社工師在社區中合作開發多元課程與連結醫療資源可增進個案福祉。三、影響雙方專業合作的負向因素:鮮少互動、諮商心理師堅持結構化的工作模式、對專業關係界線與個案保密原則的落差。四、社工師被學校定位在處遇性輔導工作內涵,「跨」心理專業逐漸能力養成。五、應意識未來學諮中心是否存在的危機。研究結論:一、在專業合作中諮商心理師需了解社工專業,成為其於學校輔導場域的橋樑。二、諮商心理師養成教育應融入教育系統觀點與專業合作知能。三、諮商心理師與社工師對個案保密原則應遵守學生輔導工作倫理守則,達成共識。四、諮商心理師應意識到未來在學校系統中的專業位置的挪移與變動。
This study aimed to investigate professional practice of counseling psychologists who worked at Student Counseling Center at the level of county and city by interviewing seven school social workers. Based on the research findings, the researchers made recommendations for professional collaboration. The results included: (1) compared with social workers, counseling psychologists gained the upper hand in being recognized in school system; it had been a challenging task to differentiate professional roles of counseling psychologists from that of school social workers. (2) From school social workers' perspectives, counseling psychologists exceled in analysis of client's psychological issues and case conceptualization. However, they had their limitations in connection with family dynamics, family systems, and resources networking for clients. Additionally, counseling psychologists with systemic perspectives collaborated with social workers to develop programs in the community and to get connected with medical resources for the purpose of improving clients' welfare. (3) Negative factors of ineffective professional collaboration arose from (a) a lack of communication between social workers and counseling psychologists, (b) counseling psychologists' overemphasis on structured working model, and (c) a difference in understandings of boundaries and confidentiality between two. (4) School social workers were expected to be able to provide services of remedial counseling, a part of job overlapping with that of counseling psychologists' work. Over time, therefore, school social workers had been equipped with counseling competencies. (5) Professionals should be aware that there could be possibility that the Student Counseling Center will be closed down. The researchers concluded: (1) Counseling psychologists need to understand the roles of social workers at Student Counseling Centers and to be responsible to bridge the gap of professional collaboration. (2) Systemic perspectives and professional collaboration competencies are needed to be incorporated into training programs of counseling. (3) Counseling psychologists and social workers at Student Counseling Center need to follow the regulations of confidentiality and boundaries of the Ethic Codes for Student Guidance Practice. (4) Counseling psychologists need to be aware that professional roles in school are changing and shifting. Implications for counseling practice, training, and future research were presented.
期刊論文
1.翟宗悌、鄔佩麗(20030600)。諮商心理師支援臺灣家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心之現況與困境分析。社區發展季刊,102,261-276。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Morrow, S. L.(2005)。Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology。Journal of Counseling Psychology,52(2),250-260。  new window
3.游淑華、姜兆眉(20110800)。諮商心理與社會工作在「家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心」的跨專業合作經驗--從社工觀點反思諮商心理專業。中華輔導與諮商學報,30,31-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳金燕(20021200)。諮商人與法律人的對話:當諮商師碰上檢察官、法官與律師時。輔導季刊,38(4),1-5。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Morrow, S. L.(2007)。Qualitative research in counseling psychology: Conceptual foundations。The Counseling Psychologist,35(2),209-235。  new window
6.D'Amour, Danielle、Ferrada-Videla, Marcela、San Martin Rodriguez, Leticia、Beaulieu, Marie-Dominique(2005)。The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks。Journal of interprofessional Care,19(Suppl. 1),116-131。  new window
7.林郁倫、陳婉真、林耀盛、王鍾和(20140500)。心理師校園駐區服務的困境、需求與挑戰--由臺北市國中輔導人員之觀點。輔導與諮商學報,36(1),37-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.王麗斐、杜淑芬、趙曉美(20080300)。國小駐校諮商心理師有效諮商策略之探索性研究。教育心理學報,39(3),413-434。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.魏書娥、林姿妙(20060700)。心理師與社工師在安寧緩和療護團隊中的角色關係--以某醫學中心安寧團隊的歷史經驗為例。生死學研究,4,37-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.莊靜(20140400)。探討學校諮商心理師和社工師專業合作之可能性。諮商與輔導,340,56-60。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳思瑜(20140300)。國中輔導教師跨專業合作經驗探討--以新北市北區為例。諮商與輔導,339,50-53。  延伸查詢new window
12.D'Amour, D.、Oandasan, I.(2005)。Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: An emerging concept。Journal of Interprofessional Care,19(Suppl. 1),8-20。  new window
13.Gitlin, L. N.、Lyons, K. J.、Kolodner, E.(1994)。A model to build collaborative research or educational teams of health professionals in gerontology。Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly,20(1),15-34。  new window
14.Mellin, E. A.、Hunt, B.、Nichols, L. M.(2011)。Counselor professional identity: Findings and implications for counseling and interprofessional collaboration。Journal of Counseling & Development,89(2),140-147。  new window
15.王麗斐、杜淑芬(20091000)。臺北市國小輔導人員與諮商心理師之有效跨專業合作研究。教育心理學報,41(專刊),295-320。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Forrest, L.(2004)。Moving out of our comfort zones: School counseling/counseling psychology partnership。The Counseling Psychologist,32(2),225-234。  new window
會議論文
1.Kadota, K.(2016)。School Social Work in Japan。2016臺灣學校社會工作學術與實務研討會:串起東亞學校社會工作的點線面。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Oh, S.-H.、Yoon, C.-S.、Kim, H.-Y.(2016)。School Social Work in Korea。2016臺灣學校社會工作學術與實務研討會:串起東亞學校社會工作的點線面。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Heath, O.、Holmqvist, M.、Gosseelin, J.(2016)。Training clinical psychologists and interprofessional practice: Ensuring that our graduates are competent。The annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association。Victoria, British Columbia。  new window
學位論文
1.管珮君(2013)。專業認同的內涵及其形塑--以跨社工與諮商專業工作者為例(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃宛姿(2010)。社工諮商人之生涯轉換與專業發展故事(碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Moustakas, C. E.(1994)。Phenomenological research methods。Sage。  new window
2.潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Quinney, Anne(2006)。Collaborative Social Work Practice。Learning Matters Ltd.。  new window
4.Creswell, John W.(2007)。Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches。Sage Publications。  new window
5.洪莉竹(20130000)。學生輔導工作:倫理守則暨案例分析。臺北市:張老師文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王佳煌、潘中道、Neuman, W. Lawrence、蘇文賢、江吟梓(2014)。當代社會研究法:質化與量化取向。學富文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.World Health Organization(2010)。The Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice,https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/framework-for-action-on-interprofessional-education-collaborative-practice。  new window
2.Luft, J.,Ingham, H.(1961)。The Johari Window: A graphic model of awareness in interpersonal relations,http://www.convivendo.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/johari-window-articolo-originale.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.林萬億、王靜惠(2010)。社會工作進入校園。學校輔導團隊工作:學校社會工作師、輔導教師與心理師的合作。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.王燦槐(2006)。臺灣性侵害防治中心之服務困境、組織問題與改革。臺灣性侵害受害者之創傷:理論、內涵與服務。臺北:學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.林萬億(2010)。學校輔導團隊工作的建制。學校輔導團隊工作:學校社會工作師、輔導教師與心理師的合作。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡幼慧、姚美華(2008)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析?。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE