:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網路匿名性及人格特質分組對群體討論發言廣度之影響
書刊名:資訊管理學報
作者:張秀華曾中蓮周惠文 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Hsiu-huaTseng, Chung-lienChou, Huey-wen
出版日期:2007
卷期:14:3
頁次:頁1-17
主題關鍵詞:人格特質內向外向網路匿名性發言廣度personalityIntroversionExtroversionInternet anonymityDivergent idea generation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:130
本研究主要探討人格特質分組方式與匿/具名情境對不同人格特質學習者在腦力激盪團體中發言廣度的影響。本研究利用實驗室實驗法來了解不同的情境及分組方式對發言廣度的影響,實驗樣本為69位大學生,籍由本研究自行設計之網路討論室,讓成員分組討論指定主題。自變項包含匿名與否(分為匿名及具名)和人格特質分組方式(分為全內向組、全外向組及混合組),依變項為發言廣度。研究結果發現匿名性對發言廣度具有正向的影響;外向型的人之發言廣度並不會受所屬不同組別(全外向組或混合組)影響,但內向型的人在全內向組中擁有較佳的發言廣度;匿名與否及人格特質分組方式對發言廣度具有交互作用。最後針對本研究結果提出討論,並在文末提出建議。
The main purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of personality on the divergent idea generation under different personality composition in teams and different environmental conditions. Laboratory experiment method was used to examine the effect of independent variables. Samples are 69 college students, who were divided into groups to discuss assigned issue in the internet-based virtual discussion room. The divergent idea generation process was recorded for further analysis. Two independent variables are environmental condition (anonymous or non-anonymous) and personality composition in teams (introverts only, extroverts only, and hybrid). The dependent variable is the number of divergent idea generated during group discussion. Results showed that personality composition in teams didn't have significant effect on the number of divergent idea generated, but Internet anonymity had significant effect. Introverts had more divergent ideas in introverts only group than in hybrid group. Moreover, there was significant interaction effect between environmental conditions and personality composition on the number of divergent idea generated.
期刊論文
1.Jessup, L. M.、Connolly, T.、Galegher, J.(1990)。The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task。MIS Quarterly,14(3),313-321。  new window
2.Barry, B.、Stewart, G. L.(1997)。Composition, Process, and Performance in Self-managed Groups: The Role of Personality。Journal of Applied Psychology,82(1),62-78。  new window
3.Kiesler, S.、Siegal, J.、McGuire, T. W.(1984)。Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication。American Psychologist,39(10),1123-1134。  new window
4.Kerr, D, S.、Murthy, U. S.(2004)。Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: A comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication。Group Decision and Negotiation,13(4),381-399。  new window
5.Johnson, D.(2000)。Anonymity and the Internet。The Futurist,34,12-12。  new window
6.Opt, S. K.、Loffredo, D. A.(2003)。Communicator Image and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Extraversion-Introversion。The Journal of Psychology,137(6),560-568。  new window
7.Yellen, R. E.、Winniford, M.、Sanford, C. C.(1995)。Extraversion and Introversion in Electronically-supported Meeting。Information and Management,28(1),63-74。  new window
8.Siegel, J.、Dubrovsky, V.、Kiesler, S.、McGuire, T. W.(1986)。Group Processes in Computer-mediated Communication。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,37,157-187。  new window
9.Tan, V.、Tiong, T. N.(1999)。Personality Type and the Singapore Manager: Research Findings Based on the MBTI。Singapore Management Review,12(1),15-31。  new window
10.Bishop-Clark, C.、Wheeler, D. D.(1994)。The Myers-Briggs Personality Types and Its Relationship to Computer Programming。Journal of Research on Computing in Education,26(3),358-370。  new window
11.Nissenbaum, H.(1999)。The Meaning of Anonymity in an Information Age。The Information Society,15(2),141-144。  new window
學位論文
1.簡恆信(1999)。虛擬社群匿名行為模式研究--以網際網路電子布告欄為例(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Simon, T.(1988)。Personality, Cognitive Ability and Behaviour: The Antecedents of Effective Autonomous Work Teams(博士論文)。McMaster University,Hamilton, Ontario。  new window
圖書
1.Myers, I. B.、McCaulley, M. H.(1985)。Manual: a guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator。Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
2.Jung, C. G.(1923)。Psychological types。New York, NY:Rutledge and Kagan Paul。  new window
3.Hirsh, S.、Kummerow, J.(1989)。Life Type。Life Type。New York, NY。  new window
4.Schermerhorn, J. R., Jr.、Hunt, J. G.、Osborn, R. N.(2003)。Organization Behavior。Organization Behavior。New York, NY。  new window
5.Nelson, D. L.、Quick, J. C.(2003)。Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, and Challenges。Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Realities, and Challenges。Ohio。  new window
6.Hogan, R. C.、Champagne, D. W.(1980)。Personal Style Inventory。The 1980 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators。San Diego, CA。  new window
其他
1.Elder, L.,Paul, R.(2000)。Universal Intellectual Standards,0。  new window
2.譚曉珊(2001)。高薪、期權、激勵-解讀CEO薪酬,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.Srisoepardani, K. P.(2001)。Evaluation of Group Decision Making Methods,0。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE