:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:優秀高中啦啦隊選手知覺教練領導與團隊凝聚力之研究
書刊名:運動休閒餐旅研究
作者:黃惠芝林仁彬陳奕伸
作者(外文):Huang, Hui-tzuLin, Zen-pinChen, I-shen
出版日期:2007
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁73-80
主題關鍵詞:啦啦隊教練領導凝聚CheerleadingLeadershipCohesion
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:33
這項研究的主要目的在探討高中啦啦隊之教練領導行為和團隊凝聚力之間的關係。受試者為2006年全國高中啦啦隊比賽之前三名選手,女生34名及男生16名的學生。全部50位完成二份問卷︰運動領導行為(LSS)和團隊凝聚力(GEQ)。所得資料經過,相依t檢定、獨立t檢定,單因子變異量數分析。其結果如下:一、高中啦啦隊選手知覺的教練領導行為,依序為:訓練與指導、社會支持、正面回饋、民主行為、專制行為。選手之教練領導,喜愛較多的訓練與指導、民主行為。女生顯著高於男生之訓練與指導及民主行為。二、啦啦隊選手知覺的團隊凝聚力,依序為團體合作、個人親和、團隊適應、個人吸引。三、良好的訓練指導對於團隊合作有正面的幫助。建議加強訓練與指導及民主行為,對於團隊合作與運動表現會有更好幫助。
The main purpose of this research was to investigate senior high student's leadership behavior and cohesiveness. The subjects were 16 female and 34 male collegiate student. Fifty participants of senior high students finish two questionnaires: Leadership Scale Sports lead the behavior (LSS) and group's cohesiveness (GEQ). The data was analyzed by dependence t-test, independent t-test and one way ANOVA. The result was as follows: The order of LSS: training instruction, social support, positive feedback, and autocratic behavior. Player prefer more training instruction and DB. Female was significant higher than training instruction and DB. The order of GEQ: GIT, ATGS, GIS and ATGT. It's meaningful and helpful for student and coach to improve team cohesion and sport performance.
期刊論文
1.Chelladurai, P.、Saleh, S. D.(1980)。Dimensions of leadership behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale。Journal of Sport Psychology,2,34-45。  new window
2.Bollen, K. A.、Hoyle, R. H.(1990)。Perceived cohesion: a conceptual and empirical examination。Social Forces,69,479-504。  new window
3.張育銓(19990300)。啦啦隊活動之探討。國民體育季刊,28(1)=120,127-135+168。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡佳蓉(20040600)。論國小階段推展競技啦啦隊運動之合宜性。中華體育季刊,18(2)=69,20-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Terry, P. C.(1984)。The coaching preferences of elite athletes competing at Universade '83。Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,9,201-208。  new window
6.楊綺儷(19940400)。大專啦啦隊之組隊與編排。大專體育,13,52-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.鄭麗媛、麥秀英(20020900)。校園啦啦隊競賽意見調查研究。體育學報,33,191-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Terry, P. C.、Howe, B. L.(1984)。Coaching preferences of athletes。Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,9(4),188-193。  new window
9.Gardner, D. E.、Shields, D. L. L.、Bredemeier, B. J. L.、Bostrom, A.(1996)。The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players。The Sport Psychologist,10(4),367-381。  new window
10.Carron, A. V.、Widmeyer, W. N.、Brawley, L. R.(1985)。The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,7(3),244-266。  new window
11.Westre, Kirk R.、Weiss, Maureen R.(1991)。The relationship between perceived coaching behavior and group cohesion in high school football teams。The Sport Psychology,5(1),41-54。  new window
圖書
1.Riemer, H. A.(1991)。Leadership behavior preferences of intercollegiate football players。Eastern Washington University.。  new window
2.Bompa, T. O.(1983)。Theory and methodology of training: The key to athletic performance。Dubuque, IA:Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co.。  new window
3.Martens, Rainer(1987)。Coaches guide to sport psychology。Human Kinetics Publishers。  new window
圖書論文
1.Widmeyer, W. N.、Carron, A. V.、Brawley, L. R.(1993)。Group cohesion in sport and exercise。Handbook of research on sport psychology。New York:Macmillan。  new window
2.Horn, T. S.(1992)。Leadership effectiveness in the sport domain。Advances in sport psychology。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top