資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.59.212.54)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
後冷戰時期美軍衝突光譜界定與低強度衝突行動
書刊名:
黃埔學報
作者:
李承禹
作者(外文):
Lee, Cheng-Yu
出版日期:
2007
卷期:
53(社會科學類)
頁次:
頁25-39
主題關鍵詞:
衝突光譜
;
低強度衝突
;
非戰爭性軍事行動
;
非傳統威脅
;
Conflict spectrum
;
Low intensity conflict
;
Military operations other than war
;
Non-traditional threat
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:90
隨著國際安全環境的明顯轉變,冷戰時期、後冷戰時期、及後911 時期,此三個重要的階段劃分出美國大相逕庭的戰略時空。然而與此三時期美軍軍事事務產生密切關連的重要軍事概念有二:一為衝突光譜的界定;另一為低強度衝突行動的再詮釋。原因在於,出於國家利益考量,軍事行動必須能反映出美國立即且毫無妥協的政治與外交原則,故此軍事行動必須能付諸實踐,合理可行。其次,軍事行動本身並非目的,乃是更高指導原則下的過渡手段,但卻也必須能展現軍事行動的特殊效能,即快速、強大實力、明確指涉與高度可靠性等。基此,本文即以衝突光譜的轉變與隨之調整的低強度衝突行動為主旨,探析美軍在各種衝突光譜的界定中,所展現出的低強度衝突行動實質面貌,以提供對美軍先進軍事思維的再認識。
以文找文
Along with international security environment obvious transformation, in the Cold War, post-Cold War, and post-911 periods, an extremely different strategic style was presented in those times. However, there are two important military concepts were relating the U.S. military affairs in the three periods. One is the limits of conflict spectrum; another has explained again why the “low intensity conflict operations” showed different forms. Because, based on the national interest consideration, military operations must be able to reflect U.S. politics and diplomatic principles immediately, does not allow to compromise, and can puts to practice. Furthermore, the military action is not a goal, it is under the higher guiding principle transition method, but also can appear the military action's special performance: be quick, powerful, has pointed, and dependable. Therefore, this research was directed a change about" conflicts spectrum " and " low intensity conflict”, and provides us a better perspective to analyze the U.S. military's low intensity conflict operations.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Väyrynen, Raimo(200601)。Preventive action by military means: A contested approach。Global Society,20(1),69-86。
2.
Dipert, Randall(2006)。Preventive War and the Epistemological Dimension of the Morality of War。Journal of Military Ethics,5(1),32-54。
會議論文
1.
U.S. Department of Defense(1986)。Proceedings of the Low-Intensity Warfare Conferenc。Low-Intensity Warfare Conference,(會議日期: 19860114~19860115)。Washington, D.C:Department of Defense。
圖書
1.
Schroer, David J.(1989)。Introduction to Low Intensity Conflict。Ft, Monroe, VA:U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command。
2.
Hale, David(1989)。Introduction to Low Intensity Conflict, Preface and Introduction。Ft. Monroe, VA:U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command。
3.
Waghelstein, John D.(19860117)。low-Intensity Conflict in the Post-Vietnam Period。Washington, D.C:Transcript of Presentation at American Enterprise Institute。
4.
Aulich, James(1992)。Framing the Falklands War: Nationhood, Culture and Identity。London:Open University Press。
5.
Sarkesian, Sam C.、Williams, John Allen、Cimbala, Stephen J.、國防部史編局(2005)。美國國家安全。台北:國防部史政編譯局。
延伸查詢
6.
Schrecker, Ellen(1994)。The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief History with Documents。Boston, MA:St. Martin's Press。
7.
U.S. Department of Defense(2004)。2003/2004 The Special Operations Forces Posture Statement。Washington D.C.:Department of Defense, Special Operations/Low-Intensity Conflict Office。
8.
U.S. Army(1995)。FM 100-7 Decisive Force: The Army in Theater Operations。Washington D.C.:Headquarters Department of the Army。
9.
Vick, Alan J.、Orletsky, David T.、Pimie, Bruce R.、Jones, Seth G.(2004)。The Stryker Brigade Combat Team: Rethinking Strategic Responsiveness and Assessing Deployment Options。Santa Monica, CA:RAND Corporation。
10.
White, Thomas E.、Shinseki, Eric K.(20010613)。Joint Statement Before the Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense on the Fiscal Year 2002 Army Budget。Washington, D.C.:U.S. Senate。
11.
Vick, Alan J.、Orletsky, David T.、Pimie, Bruce R.、Jones, Seth G.。The Stryker Brigade Combat Team: Rethinking Strategic Responsiveness and Assessing Deployment Options。
12.
The U.S. Army(2000)。Operational Requirements Document for a Family of Interim Armored Vehicles (IAV). Prepared for Milestone I Decision。Washington, D.C:Headquarters, Department of the Army。
13.
U.S. Army(2001)。Concept for the Objective Force。Washington, D,C:Headquarters, Department of the Army。
14.
Schroer, David J.(1989)。Introduction to Low Intensity Conflict。Ft Monroe, VA:U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command。
15.
Barnett, Anthony(1982)。Iron Britannia。London:Allison & Busby。
16.
Beirn, Tony(1982)。On the Falklands War。London:Spokesman。
17.
Laffin, John(1991)。The World in Conflict, 1991: World Annual Contemporary Warfare Described and Analyzed。London:Brassey's。
18.
Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff(20000500)。Joint Vision 2020。Washington D.C.:Government Printing Office。
19.
(2006)。The National Security of United States of America。Washington D. C.:The White House。
其他
1.
U.S. Army。Army Announces Name for Interim Armored Vehicle,http://www.army.mil/features/stryker/default.htm., 2006/03/24。
圖書論文
1.
Purkiss, Charles T.(1986)。Intelligence Requirements for Low-Intensity Conflicts。Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology。Montgomery, AL:Air University Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
美軍境外「穩定行動」概念探析:非戰爭性軍事行動(MOOTW) 觀點
2.
21世紀現實主義中的美國軍事行動特質:低強度衝突理論分析
1.
後軍事社會中台灣的軍事治理
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code