:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:師生互動關係量表之編製及模式之驗證研究
書刊名:教育學術彙刊
作者:孫旻儀
作者(外文):Sun, Min-yi
出版日期:2007
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁23-40
主題關鍵詞:師生互動關係影響力接近性驗證性因素分析Teacher-student interactionInfluence of teacherProximity of teacherConfirmatory factor analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:269
本研究旨在編製一份適合國內國中學生知覺師生互動關係量表及驗證師生互動關係模式,以了解國中學生知覺師生互動關係的情形,並提供研究與輔導應用。 全量表包含「教師影響力量表」及「教師接近性量表」,共有兩個分量表,12題,施測時間約隔5~10分鐘。本研究以全臺灣地區800名國中1-3年級學生為樣本進行驗證性因素分析及信、效度考驗。研究結果顯示:(1)在信度上,兩個分量表之Cronbach α係數介於.87~.91之間,總量表的Cronbach α值為.93)。顯示此量表的一致性信度良好。(2)在效度上,以探索性因素分析檢驗,獲得良好的解釋量,且與理論架構相符,進一步採用驗證性因素分析檢驗其概念建構,顯示有良好的適配情形,顯示量表的建構效度良好。
There are four purposes in this research: First, to develop a teacher-student interaction scale for junior high school students. Second, to verify the teacher-student interaction model in confirmatory factor analysis. Third, to figure out the development of teacher-student interaction scale for the junior high school students in Taiwan. Finally, to provide references applicable in research and counseling. This scale, which is divided into influence/proximity dimension and can be conducted within 5~10 minutes, includes 2 sub-scales and 12 questions. There are 800 students selected from the students including all grades of junior high schools in Taiwan. They are tested under confirmatory factor analysis for reliability and validity. The results have shown: (1) the teacher-student interaction scale has reached satisfactory level of internal consistency reliability. The Cronbach α coefficients of two sub-scales are between .91~.87. The Cronbach α Coefficient of overall scale is .93. (2) By using confirmatory factor analysis to examine the model, we model, we found overall model fits indices indicated that the teacher-student interaction model fitted the observed data well. All the results show that the scale has a clear factorial structure.
期刊論文
1.Wubbels, T.、Levy, J.(1993)。Do you know what you look like。Educational Leadership,49(1),65-68。  new window
2.潘正德(19930700)。小團體輔導之研究理論--測量方法的選擇。學生輔導通訊,27,72-77。  延伸查詢new window
3.Wubbels, Theo、Levy, Jack、Brekelmans, Mieke(1997)。Paying attention to relationships。Educational Leadership,54(7),82-86。  new window
學位論文
1.曾心怡(1999)。性別、班級組成形式、師生互動與學習動機:以高三自然組物理科為例(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭秋紅(1993)。單親家庭國中生親子互動關係、自我尊重、社會支持與寂寞感之研究(碩士論文)。文化大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.賴鑫城(1992)。國中學生自我概念、學業成就、師生關係對學校態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。  延伸查詢new window
4.林美智(2000)。空中大學師生互動與學生學習滿意度之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.林琴芳(2001)。師生口語溝通之分析(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.郭榮澤(1985)。國中高、低成就學生師生互動關係之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳佳玲(1995)。家庭結構、親子互動關係與青少年子女行為表現之研究--繼親家庭與生親家庭之比較(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hayduk, L. A.(1999)。Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL。New Jersey:Johns Opkins University Press。  new window
2.Flanders, Ned A.(1970)。Analyzing teaching behavior。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
3.陳奎憙、王淑俐、單文經、黃德祥(1996)。師生關係與班級經營。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Wubbels, T.,Hooymayer, H. P.,Creton, H. A.(1985)。Discipline problems of beginning teachers,interact ional teacher behavior mapped out(NO.ED260 040)。  new window
圖書論文
1.邱皓政(2002)。結構方程模式。雙葉書廊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE