臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：厚尾分配之風險值估計--以股價指數為例
書刊名：中原企管評論
作者：劉洪鈞／李彥賢／洪瑞成 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liu, Hung-chun／Lee, Yen-hsien／Hung, Jui-cheng
出版日期：2008
卷期：6:1
頁次：頁75-97
主題關鍵詞：厚尾；風險值；GARCH-HT；市場風險；Fat tails；VaR；Market risk
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:43
本文以香港恆生股價指數、南韓綜合股價指數之日資料爲對象，對GARCH-N、GARCH-t及GARCH-HT三種風險值模型，進行實證，探討何種資產報酬率的分配，對風險值估計具有較佳的表現。不同於以往研究經常使用之常態分配或t 分配，本文採取Politis(2004)提出之具高峰、厚尾特性的HT分配來描繪資產報酬率的分配。同時以準確性、效率性兩個層面來評價風險值模型在多頭、空頭部位之績效表現，使實證結果更具廣泛性。實證結果顯示，GARCH-N模型即便在較低的信心水準下，絕大多數的情況下都是最有效率的，但其在準確性的表現上令人失望。GARCH-t模型除了無法完全通過回溯測試外，且在大多數的情況下，亦爲最不具效率的模型。然而，在多頭、空頭部位下，GARCH-HT模型在所有實證資料、不同信心水準下，皆能通過回溯測試，顯示GARCH-HT模型之風險值估計最具準確性。另外，在較高的信心水準下，GARCH-HT模型大都是最有效率的，顯示GARCH-HT模型能同時兼顧風險值預測的準確性與效率性。實證結果建議持有多頭部位或空頭部位的投資者，使用GARCH(1,1)模型並搭配高峰、厚尾的HT分配，可有效提升VaR值的風險管理績效。
This study investigates the influence of fat-tailed innovation process on the performance of VaR (Value-at-Risk, VaR) estimates by three GARCH models (GARCH-N, GARCH-t and GARCH-HT). Daily spot prices of two Asian emerging stock indices (Hangseng Index-Hongkong and South Korea-KOSPI Index) are used as the empirical sample to discuss and compare the accuracy and efficiency of these VaR models. In contrast to previous literature, this study encompasses both the GARCH(1,1) model and heavy-tailed returns innovation (proposed by Politis, 2004) in stead of the normal or student-t distributions. Meanwhile, the empirical performance of VaR models is more comprehensive by accommodating both accuracy and efficiency aspects for long and short trading positions. Empirical results indicate that for asset returns that exhibit leptokurtic and fat-tailed, the VaR forecasts generated by the GARCH-N models deliver unsatisfactory accuracy even though it is more efficient than the others at lower confidence levels. The GARCH-t model not only cannot pass the back-testing but also is the least efficient model in general. However, the VaR forecasts generated by the GARCH-HT models can fully pass the back-testing method for all cases, which provide the most reliable accuracy. In particular, the GARCH-HT is more efficient than alternatives at high confidence levels for most cases, which reveal that it can look after both sides for VaR forecasts. Thus, VaR for traders having both long and short positions, we suggest using an GARCH(1,1) model based on the HT distribution to enhance the performance of risk management.
期刊論文
1.Giot, Pierre、Laurent, Sébastien(2003)。Value-at-Risk for Long and Short Trading Positions。Journal of Applied Econometrics，18(6)，641-663。  new window
2.Huang, Yu-Chuan、Lin, Bor-jing(2004)。Value-at-Risk Analysis for Taiwan Stock Index Futures: Fat Tails and Conditional Asymmetries in Return Innovations。Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting，22(2)，79-95。  new window
3.Chiu, C. L.、Lee, M. C.、Hung, J. C.(2005)。Estimation of Value-at-Risk under Jump Dynamics and Asymmetric Information。Applied Financial Economics，15(15)，1095-1106。  new window
4.Giot, P.、Laurent, S.(2004)。Modeling Daily Value-at-Risk using Realized Volatility and ARCH type Models。Journal of Empirical Finance，11，379-398。  new window
5.Brooks, C.、Persand, G.(2002)。Model Choice and Value-at-Risk Performance。Financial Analysts Journal，58(5)，87-97。  new window
6.Christoffersen, P. F.、Diebold, F.(2000)。How Relevant is Volatility Forecasting for Financial Risk Management?。Review of Economics and Statistics，82(1)，12-22。  new window
7.李命志、洪瑞成、劉洪鈞(20070500)。厚尾GARCH模型之波動性預測能力比較。輔仁管理評論，14(2)，47-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Lopez, J.(1999)。Methods for Evaluating Value-at-Risk Estimates。Economic Review，12，3-17。  new window
9.Ha, I.、Khil, J.、Lee, B.(2001)。On the rationality of Korea's stock market: was the recent Korean financial crisis due to fundamental factors。Journal of International Financial markets, Institutions and Money，11(3/4)，423-441。  new window
10.張揖平、洪明欽、陳哲弘(20030900)。資產報酬率分配對風險值計算之影響。輔仁管理評論，10(3)，181-205。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Engle, R. F.(1982)。Autoregressive Conditional Heteroske- dasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation。Econometrica，50(4)，987-1008。  new window
12.Fama, E. F.(1965)。The behavior of stock market prices。Journal of Business，38(1)，34-105。  new window
13.Hendricks, Darryll(1996)。Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models Using Historical Data。Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review，2(1)，39-69。  new window
14.Akgiray, Vedat(1989)。Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Time Series of Stock Returns: Evidence and Forecasts。The Journal of Business，62(1)，55-80。  new window
15.Bollerslev, Tim(1986)。Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity。Journal of Econometrics，31(3)，307-327。  new window
16.Bollerslev, Tim(1987)。A Conditionally Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return。The Review of Economics and Statistics，69(3)，542-547。  new window
17.Bollerslev, Tim、Chou, Ray Y.、Kroner, Kenneth F.(1992)。ARCH Modeling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence。Journal of Econometrics，52(1/2)，5-59。  new window
18.Politis, Dimitris N.(2004)。A Heavy-Tailed Distribution for ARCH Residuals with Application to Volatility Prediction。Annals of Economics and Finance，5(2)，283-298。  new window
19.Van Den Goorbergh, R. W. J.、Vlaar, P. J. G.(1999)。Value-at-Risk Analysis of Stock Returns: Historical Simulation, Variance Techniques or Tail Index Estimation?。De Nederlandse Bank--Staff Reports，40，1-37。  new window
20.Kupiec, Paul H.(1995)。Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models。Journal of Derivatives，3(2)，73-84。  new window
21.Mittnik, S.、Paolella, M. S.(2000)。Conditional Density and Value-at-Risk Prediction of Asian Currency Exchange Rates。Journal of Forecasting，19(4)，313-333。  new window
22.Glosten, Lawrence R.、Jagannathan, Ravi、Runkle, David E.(1993)。On the Relation Between the Expected Value and the Volatility on the Nominal Excess Returns on Stocks。Journal of Finance，48(5)，1779-1801。  new window
23.Mandelbrot, Benoit B.(1963)。The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices。The Journal of Business，36(4)，394-419。  new window
24.邱文昌(2004)。國內外選擇權市場發展概述。證券暨期貨月刊，22(10)。  延伸查詢new window
25.林允永、邱建良、洪瑞成(2005)。價格跳躍下的風險值估計-以 S&P500 現貨、美國 30 年公債期貨與布蘭特原油期貨為例。中原企管評論，3(4)，99-130。  延伸查詢new window
26.Angelidis, T., A. Benos and S. Degiannakis(2004)。The Use of GARCH Models in VaREstimation。Statistical Methodology，1，105-128。  new window
27.Angelidis, T.、Degiannakis, S.(2005)。Modeling Risk for Long and Short Trading Positions。The Journal of Risk Finance，6，226-238。  new window
28.Hull, J. and A. White(1998)。Vaule at Risk when Daily Changes in Market Variables arenot Normally Distributed。Journal of Derivatives，5，9-19。  new window
29.So, M. K. P. and P. L. H. Yu(2006)。Empirical Analysis of GARCH Models in Value at Risk Estimation。International Financial Markets，16，180-197。  new window
圖書
1.Jorion, Philippe(2000)。Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk。Irvine：University of California。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：385（臺灣：358，外國：27） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2344557 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68145491
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上