:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大學生休閒活動涉入與覺知自由之研究
書刊名:運動休閒餐旅研究
作者:黃長發 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chang-fa
出版日期:2007
卷期:2:4
頁次:頁145-163
主題關鍵詞:大學生活動涉入覺知自由College studentsActivity involvementPerceived freedom
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:46
目的:比較不同背景變項之大學生在休閒活動涉入與覺知自由之間的差異及了解大學生之休閒活動涉入與覺知自由的相關情形。方法:本研究以臺灣中部地區大學校院學生為研究對象,共有611名(男296人,女315人)。本研究以休閒活動涉入量表與覺知自由量表為研究工具。所得資料分別以t檢定、單因子變異數分析及典型相關分析進行研究問題之驗證。結果:不同性別、就讀年級及每月可支配之休閒花費的大學生在休閒活動涉入與覺知自由上有差異存在。休閒活動涉入與覺知自由之間具有正向相關,休閒活動涉入愈不傾向於「吸引力」、「中心性」及「自我表達」,其覺知自由就愈不傾向於「嬉戲性」、「休閒涉入深度」、「休閒需求」及「休閒控制」。休閒活動涉入愈傾向於「吸引力」,其覺知自由就愈傾向於「休閒涉入深度」。結論:從事正當及優質休閒活動可獲得相當多的益處,本研究結果可提供學校及相關單位作為休閒活動教育及政策規劃之參考。
Purposes: To compare the difference of leisure activity involvement and perceived freedom of the college students with different background variables. To understand the relationships between leisure activity involvement and perceived freedom of college students. Methods: There were 611 college students (male 296, female 315) were drawn form the colleges of the middle area in Taiwan as the subjects. All the subjects were administered with leisure activity involvement and perceived freedom inventory. The collected data was analyzed by t-test, one-way ANOVA and canonical correlation. Results: There were differences in leisure activity involvement ad perceived freedom among the variables of sex, grade, and monthly expenses allowance. The less attractiveness, centricity, and self-presentation of leisure activity involvement, the less playing depth of leisure activity involvement, demand for leisure and leisure controllability of perceived freedom they owned. The more attractiveness of leisure activity involvement, the more depth of leisure involvement in perceived freedom. Conclusions: They are many benefits receive by doing proper leisure activities. The results of this study can provide the reference for leisure activity education and policy plan authorities.
期刊論文
1.Ewert, A.、Hollenhorst, S.(1989)。Testing the adventure model: Empirical support for a model of risk recreation。Journal of Leisure Research,21,124-139。  new window
2.Guinn, B.、Semper, T.、Jorgensen, L.(1996)。Perceived leisure freedom and activity involvement among Mexican American adolescent。Hinspanic Journal of Behavioral Science,18(3),356-366。  new window
3.Park, S. H.(1996)。Relationships between involvement and attitudinal loyalty constructs in adult fitness programs。Journal of Leisure Research,28,233-250。  new window
4.Bloch, P. H.(1981)。An exploration into the scaling of consumers' involvement with a product class。Advances in consumer Research,8(1),61-65。  new window
5.張良漢(200606)。大學生休閒覺知自由與休閒無聊感之相關研究。聯大學報,3(1),156-170。  延伸查詢new window
6.顏妙桂(20040400)。青春活力--從心理社會發展觀點論述青少年的休閒投入。學校體育,14(2)=81,14-21。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kyle, G. T.、Graefe, A.、Manning, R.、Bacon, J.(2004)。Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists' perceptions of setting density。Journal of Leisure Research,36(2),209-231。  new window
8.Havitz, M. E.、Dimanche, F.(1990)。Propositions for guiding the empirical testing of the involvement construct in recreational and tourist contexts。Leisure Sciences,12(2),179-196。  new window
9.陳皆榮(20040400)。倡導休閒活動、展開亮麗人生。學校體育,14(2)=81,38-44。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ellis, G.、Witt, P.(1984)。The measurement of perceived freedom in leisure。Journal of Leisure Research,16(2),110-123。  new window
11.Iso-Ahola, S. E.、Weissinger, E.(1990)。Perception of boredom in leisure: Conceptualization, reliability and validity of the Leisure Boredom Scale。Journal of Leisure Research,22(1),1-17。  new window
12.Tinsley, H. E. A.、Johnson, T. L.(1984)。A preliminary taxonomy of leisure activities。Journal of Leisure Research,16(3),234-244。  new window
13.Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne(1985)。Measuring the Involvement Construct。Journal of Consumer Research,12(3),341-352。  new window
14.McIntyre, N.(1989)。The personal meaning of participation: Enduring involvement。Journal of Leisure Research,21(2),167-179。  new window
15.McIntyre, Norman、Pigram, John J.(1992)。Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle-based campers。Leisure Sciences,14(1),3-15。  new window
16.Laurent, Gilles、Kapferer, Jean-Noël(1985)。Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles。Journal of Marketing Research,22(1),41-53。  new window
17.Selin, S. W.、Howard, D. R.(1988)。Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification。Journal of Leisure Research,20(3),237-244。  new window
會議論文
1.張良漢、黃長發(2003)。休閒覺知自由與休閒無聊感之相關研究。2003年台灣體育運動與健康休閒發展趨勢研討會。嘉義:吳鳳技術學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.王正平、朱笠瑄(2003)。攀岩活動持久性涉入程度與活動/環境屬性之關係研究。2003年務實觀光休閒產業經營學術討會。臺北:真理大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Ajzen, I.、Driver, B. L.(1990)。Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice。The Sixth Canadian Congress on Leisure Research。Waterloo, Ontario。  new window
學位論文
1.羅美華(2005)。國中生內外控信念與休閒覺知自由關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schuett, M. A.(1991)。Testing the adventure model for outdoor recreation(博士論文)。University of Illinois。  new window
3.孫孟君(1998)。身心障礙青少年休閒自由、休閒偏好及休閒阻礙之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.王玉璽(2006)。以結構方程模式分析台中教育大學學生休閒覺之自由、休閒阻礙、休閒參與之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭淑菁(2003)。登山社員休閒涉入、休閒滿意度與幸福感之研究(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡家欣(2000)。大學生的休閒認知、涉入與體驗:兼論人格特質的影響(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉盈足(2005)。公務員週末之休閒涉入與其休閒滿意度關係之探討--以彰化地區鄉鎮市公所為例(碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。  延伸查詢new window
8.趙文祺(2004)。體驗教育活動參與者內在動機、活動投入程度與神馳體驗關係之探討(碩士論文)。大葉大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eills, G. D.、Witt, P. A.(1984)。The leisure diagnostic battery: Theoretical and empirical structure。Denton, Texas:North Texas State University。  new window
2.邱皓政(2000)。社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Neulinger, J.(1981)。The psychology of leisure。Charles C. Thomas。  new window
4.吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。松崗。  延伸查詢new window
5.DeVellis, Robert F.(1991)。Scale Development: Theory and Applications。Sage。  new window
6.Nunnally, Jum C.、Bernstein, Ira H.(1978)。Psychometric Theory。McGraw-Hill。  new window
圖書論文
1.王俊明(2000)。問卷量表的編製與分析方法。體育測驗與評鑑。臺北:中華民國體育學會。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE