:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從英方檔案看1950年代國府的「關閉政策」
書刊名:政大史粹
作者:林宏一
作者(外文):Lin, Hong Yi
出版日期:2007
卷期:13
頁次:頁147-187
主題關鍵詞:關閉政策中英關係淡水領事館冷戰封鎖Port-closure policySino-British relationsBritish consulate in TamsuiCold warBlockade
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:55
1949年6月,中華民國政府宣稱,將「關閉」所有在中共控制之下的中國領水以及海港,並以海空武力禁制各國船隻進出被「關閉」的港口。政府使用「關閉」一詞來描述此種近乎海上封鎖的行為,是為了避免引發開於交戰權利以及其他國際法理的爭議,並藉以強調,「關閉本國港口」乃是行使主權。然而,大多數主要國家,特別是英國,基於對華貿易以及航運的利益起見,都不接受此種說法,並視之為一種不合法理的手段。儘管英國早在1950年1月6日便撤銷對中華民國的承認,但仍保留其淡水領事館,處理台灣地區的商貿業務,並作為中英兩國政府的交流管道。由於大多數經營大陸沿海航運及貿易的船隻都登記為英國或香港籍,國軍在執行關閉政策時「干涉」英藉船隻的事例也就十分頻繁,成為中英之間的嚴重糾紛,而身為對中華民國政府交涉的第一線,淡水領事館對於這類事件也投以相當的關注。淡水領事館呈報給英國外交部的定期報告已經出版,即Taiwan Political and Economic Reports。藉由這些報告中所提及的大量「干涉航運」的案例,吾人可以描繪出1950年代中華民國政府「關閉政策」的型貌,並顯現出淡水館領水官們以何種角度對此進行分析及評估。除了以國際大環境、美國冷戰政策來解讀之外,他們也質於強調「英國因素」,如中英關係的冷暖、中華民國政府/國民黨高層的反英清緒,乃至英國海軍為英國商船護航,抗拒國軍艦艇等等。本文不僅希望能描繪關閉政策的基本輪廓,更希望藉由英國方面的視角,讓讀者能從另一個方向來回顧1950年代的台海冷戰局勢。
In June 1949, after the fallen of Shanghai, the ROC government announced to "close" all Chinese territorial waters and seaports controlled by CCP and to disallow vessels of any nationalities getting in or out the "closed ports", by the enforcement of ROC navy and air force. This it almost a kind of naval BLOCKADE in fact, but the ROC government used the term CLOSE in order not to raise the question of belligerent rights or other controversies in international law, and emphasized that "closing the domestic ports" was its sovereign right. But most of the major countries, especially the United Kingdom, concerning the interest of trading and transporting in the mainland China, did not accept this kind of view and considered that the "closure" was an unlawful measure. Although UK had withdrawn the recognition from ROC since Jun. 6, 1950, she maintained her consulate in Tamsui (淡水), Taiwan, for handling the commerce affairs and business in Taiwan, and therefore it became the communicating channel between the ROC and UK government. While most vessels served in the coastal shipping and cabotage of mainland China were registered in the UK or Hong Kong, the "interference of British shipping (in order to enforce the port-closure policy)" from ROC armed force were very frequently, and the Tamsui consulate, as on the frontline dealing with the ROC government (withdrawn to Taiwan in Dec. 1949), paid much attention on these incidents, which became one of the major problems between ROC and UK. The regular reports from Tamsui consulate to the British Foreign Office were printed in the collection Taiwan Political and Economic Reports. These reports, which included many "interference" cases, could be used to draw the outline of the "port-closure policy" of ROC during the 1950's, and indicated the view of Tamsui consuls in estimating and analyzing the situation and action. They used to explain the "interference" actions with the international environment, the US cold war policies, and the British factor-the changes of Sino-British relations, the anti-British atmosphere in the ROC and/or KMT high-rank circle, and even the coned intervention of the Royal Navy to escort the British vessels from ROCN warships. In this article, I hope that it could provide not only the outline of the "port-closure policy", but also give the readers another point of view to rediscover the situation and conflict of the cold war in the Taiwan Strait during the 1950's.
期刊論文
1.何燿光(20020400)。海軍關閉大陸港口政策之研究--戡亂作戰中一個幾乎被遺忘的部分。中華軍史學會會刊,7,45-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李如慕(1967)。關閉措施與陶普斯號案在國際公法上之研究。法律評論,33(2),9-17。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃剛(1971)。中國關閉中共區港口引起的國際法問題之研究。政大法學評論,4,255-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.董志凱(1991)。五十年代我國反對"封鎖、禁運"的鬥爭。中國經濟史研究,1991(1),1-19。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉文孝(2006)。陶普斯號郵輪奇案。兵器戰術圖解,26,120-121。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.高純淑(2000)。胡宗南與東南沿海作戰─以《胡宗南日記》為中心的探討。臺北。75-92。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Tsang, Steve(2006)。The Cold War's Odd Couple: The Unintended Partnership between the Republic Of China and the UK, 1950-1958。I. B. Tauris。  new window
2.Jarman, Robert L.(1997)。Taiwan Political and Economic Reports。Slough:Archive Editions。  new window
3.盧如春(1989)。海軍史。北京市:解放軍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.鍾堅(2003)。驚濤駭浪中戰備航行:海軍艦艇誌。臺北市:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉廣凱(1994)。劉廣凱將軍報國憶往。臺北市:中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
6.Jarman, Robert L.(1997)。Taiwan Political and Economic Reports,1952-1960 (vol. 10)。Taiwan Political and Economic Reports,1952-1960 (vol. 10)。Slough, U.K.。  new window
7.United States Department of State(1977)。Foreign Relations of the United States, 1951(vol. 7)。Foreign Relations of the United States, 1951(vol. 7)。Washington, D. C.。  new window
8.中華民國出席聯合國大會第九屆常會代表團(1955)。中華民國出席聯合國大會第九屆常會代表團報告書。中華民國出席聯合國大會第九屆常會代表團報告書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
9.傅建中(1988)。從美國國務院秘密外交文件中看「陶甫斯號」。中華民國史事紀要(初稿)中華民國四十三年(一九五四)一至六月份。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
10.徐舸(1999)。鐵錨固海疆:共和國海戰史記。鐵錨固海疆:共和國海戰史記。北京。  延伸查詢new window
11.Jarman, Robert L.(1997)。Taiwan Political and Economic Reports (vol. 9)。Taiwan Political and Economic Reports (vol. 9)。Slough, U.K.。  new window
其他
1.英放寬對匪禁運案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.關於劃定軍事行動區域禁止外輪資匪案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.關閉匪區領水及港口案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.周琇環(2006)。戰後外交部工作報告(民國四十二年至民國四十五年),臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.英艦護航資匪商輪案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.英輪航駛福州廈門資匪案,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.海軍總部卅九年作戰關閉報告書。  延伸查詢new window
8.對英、印外交,台北。  延伸查詢new window
9.傅建中(2001)。《中國海上突擊隊》一書 我軍襲共 CIA一手策劃,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top