:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:人類胚胎之形上與道德地位
書刊名:國立臺灣大學哲學論評
作者:孫效智 引用關係
作者(外文):Sun, Hsiao-chih
出版日期:2007
卷期:34
頁次:頁41-85
主題關鍵詞:人類胚胎桑椹胚囊胚人類複製位格物種主義同一性連續性潛能同卵雙胞胚胎融合孤雌生殖胚胎幹細胞謹慎論證Human embryoMorulaBlastocystHuman cloningPersonSpeciesismIdentityContinuityPotentialityTwinningFusionParthenogensisEmbryonic stem cellBenefit of the doubt-argument
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:83
本文探討人類胚胎具有怎樣的形上與道德地位,是許多生命倫理議題共同的基礎問題。文分四部分,首先,先說明問題的背景與重要性,指出本問題無論是對傳統的墮胎課題,或對當今最熱門的胚胎幹細胞研究或人類複製的倫理探討,都是不可規避的問題。其次,本文在討論這個問題之前,將先界定問題的精確意涵。這裡其實有兩個息息相關但卻不太一樣的問題,一個是胚胎形上地位的問題,一個是胚胎道德地位的問題。形上地位的問題要問的是胚胎是否是位格,而道德地位問題則是胚胎是否因而具有位格的尊嚴。由於位格尊嚴仍是相當籠統的觀念,本文將問題聚焦在一個具體的問題上,亦即在正常情境下是否可以為了醫學研究而殺害胚胎?界定好問題意涵後,本文最主要的論述在第三部份。這裡先探討位格是什麼,然後以此為基礎來處理「人類胚胎是否是位格」這個根本問題,最後再輔以「謹慎論證」指出:人類胚胎是位格,或至少,在沒有充分證據顯示它不是位格的情形下,應將之視為位格。第四部分是結論,根據前一部分之討論,若人類胚胎應被當成位格來看待,那麼,在正常情境下,為了促進醫學研究與人類福祉而殺死胚胎是不合乎倫理的。
Exploring the metaphysical and moral status of human embryo, one of the most fundamental questions underlying many significant bioethical issues, this essay is divided into four parts. It is firstly to be shown that not only the traditional moral controversy surrounding abortion but also that of the most cutting-edge researches of embryonic stem cell and human cloning can not be properly dealt with without first addressing the question of the metaphysical and moral status of human embryo. Secondly, the meaning of the question will be precisely defined so that the discussion can be rightly focused. The metaphysical part of the question is concerned with the issue whether human embryo is an entity with personhood, i.e. whether it is at the same time a human person. The second part is accordingly the moral question whether a human embryo has the dignity of a person and therefore shall be treated as an end by itself and not as only a means, which again means whether it is morally wrong to kill human embryos for the sake of the welfare of humankind. The main arguments for and contra the personhood of human embryos are presented in the third part after a comprehensive account of personhood is offered as a basis for the discussion. Different arguments such as speciesism, identity, continuity, potentiality and last but not least, benefit of the doubt-argument are evaluated and appealed to. The thesis arrived at is that human embryos are persons or at least shall be treated as persons when the antithesis is not sufficiently and well grounded. The fourth and last part concludes the essay with the claim that in normal situations it is immoral to kill human embryos for the progress of the medicine and the welfare of the mankind.
期刊論文
1.蔡甫昌(2005)。Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Debates: A Confucian Argument。Journal of Medical Ethics,31,635-640。  new window
2.Damschen, Gregor、Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso、Schoenecker, Dieter(2006)。Sixteen Days? A Reply to B. Smith and B. Brogaard on the Beginning of Human Individuals。Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,31(2),165-175。  new window
3.FitzPatrick, William J.(2004)。Totipotency and the Moral Status of Embryos: New Problems for an Old Argument。Journal of Social Philosophy.,35(1),108-122。  new window
4.Nelson, Lawrence、Meyer, Michael J.(2005)。Confronting Deep Moral Disagreement: The President's Council on Bioethics, Moral Status, and Human Embryos。The American Journal of Bioethics,2005(5)/2005(6),33-42。  new window
5.Jonathan, Shaw(2004)。Debating the Moral Status of the Embryo。Harvard Magazine,106,6。  new window
6.Smith, Barry、Brogaard, Berit(2003)。Sixteen Days。Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,28(1),45-78。  new window
7.孫效智(2004)。複製倫理面面觀。人籟文化論辨月刊,6,28-41。  延伸查詢new window
8.孫效智(2004)。《複製倫理面面觀》再次回應。人籟文化論辨月刊,8,10-12。  延伸查詢new window
9.潘震澤(2004)。回應《複製倫理面面觀》一文。人籟文化論辨月刊,10-11。  延伸查詢new window
10.潘震澤(2002)。孤雌生殖與胚胎幹細胞。科學發展月刊,352,66-67。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Jeff McMahan(2002)。The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Spaemann, Robert(1996)。Personen, Versuche über den Unterschied zwischen etwas und jemand。Stuttgart。  new window
3.羅秉祥(1992)。黑白分明。香港:宣道。  延伸查詢new window
4.Damschen, Gregor、Schoenecker, Dieter(2003)。Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryoen。Der moralische Status menschlicher Embryoen。Berlin/New York。  new window
5.Lehmann, Karl(2001)。Das Recht, ein Mensch zu sein. Zur Grundfrage der gegenwaertigen bioethischen Probleme。Das Recht, ein Mensch zu sein. Zur Grundfrage der gegenwaertigen bioethischen Probleme。  new window
6.President's Council on Bioethics(2002)。Human Cloning and Human Dignity。Human Cloning and Human Dignity。New York。  new window
7.Stanley, Rudman(1997)。Concepts of Person and Christian Ethics。Concepts of Person and Christian Ethics。Cambridge。  new window
8.孫效智(2000)。Are All Human Beings Persons。The Moral Status of Persons: Perspective on Bioethics。Amsterdam。  new window
9.Warnock, Mary(1984)。Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology。Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology。London。  new window
其他
1.蔡甫昌。臨床試驗之倫理規範。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE