:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:平成觀護法之啟示與我國觀護法案之芻議
書刊名:犯罪學期刊
作者:林順昌
作者(外文):Lin, Shun-chang
出版日期:2008
卷期:11:2
頁次:頁33-64
主題關鍵詞:觀護修復式司法更生保護被害者保護犯罪者處遇刑事政策Probation systemRestorative justiceAfter careVictim protectionCriminal treatmentCriminal policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:90
邇來,日本爲順應世界潮流而大舉變革觀護法制,在彙整成一部專法之後,促使其發展更上一層樓。回眸我國司法改革在犯罪者處遇體系遠遠不及犯罪偵查、審判體系之實踐,放任一甲子專法闕如而單純借用保安處分執行法其中寥寥數條運作,較諸日本的與時俱進,直教人心虛汗顏。尤其甚者,觀護體系長期寄宿於行爲本質全然迥異的檢察機關,吊詭的羽翼關係及過度的鄰接業務,益使業務難脫多藝不精的窠臼,遑論專業。鑑此,吾人洵應急起省思值此政治輪替之際提出法案芻議,建構本土化之觀護專業,始於整體司法與社會有益。爰以基層之務實理念及觀護學理擬議,俾以拋磚引玉。
Recently, Japan to meet the world trend, the concept of substantial change for the rule of law, in the whole of the law into one, to promote the development of a higher level of the system. Recalling that the judicial reform about the system of criminal treatment in Taiwan is far less than the practice for the criminal investigation and the trial system, just only depend on some provisions in the implementation of sanctions which the Security to operation allowed for several decades without the rules. Compared with Japan, it is feel very guilty conscience. In addition, because of boarding long-term that District Prosecutorial organs nature of the acts completely difference, the paradox of the fledgling relationship, and over the adjacent business, the more difficult it from the chaotic result, it is let alone professional. In view of this, we should catch up them, to taking advantage of the change of political opportunity, and introduce bills reflect on the recommendations to construct the localize probation professional, then it will be useful to the overall justice system and society. So I would base on a grass-roots worker to make recommendations according to the pragmatic idea and probation academic, to offer a few ordinary introductory remarks so that others may offer their valuable ideas.
期刊論文
1.林順昌(20071000)。論假釋處分之撤銷與救濟--評最高行政法院93年2月庭長法官聯席會議決議。中央警察大學法學論集,13,69-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林順昌(20060300)。犯罪者處遇政策新動向--以日本中間處遇制度之發展為中心。月旦法學,130,105-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林順昌(20061100)。日本保護管束機制論考--兼評移植我國之可行性。月旦法學,138,190-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林順昌(20050300)。借鏡日本實況談我國緩起訴制度--以被告社會復歸為中心。月旦法學,118,125-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.上田信太郎(1989)。西ドイツにおける私人訴追手続。一橋研究,13(4),87。  延伸查詢new window
6.中村正(2002)。家庭内暴力の克服―司法による援助設定をとおして。月報司法書士,361,16-17。  延伸查詢new window
7.林順昌(2008)。〈概述2007 年日本更生保護法──整合式觀護法制的全方位檢討〉。警大法學論集,14 期。  延伸查詢new window
8.瀨川晃(1981)。社会內処遇は新たなユートピアか。犯罪と非行,49,26。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.久保貴(2001)。社会内処遇。  延伸查詢new window
2.高木俊彦(2001)。少年の社会内処遇。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Braithwaite, J.(1999)。Restorative justice : Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts。CRIME AND JUSTICE, 25 A Review of research。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.南博(1953)。日本人の心理。東京:岩波書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lab, Steven P.(2000)。Crime prevention: Approaches, practices and evaluations。Anderson Publishing Company。  new window
4.北沢信次(2003)。犯罪者処遇の展開―保護観察を焦点として。成文堂。  延伸查詢new window
5.森下忠(1994)。刑事政策の論点。成文堂。  延伸查詢new window
6.高橋則夫(1997)。刑法における損害回復の思想。成文堂。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳再明(1993)。日本論:解析日本強盛繁榮的祕密。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
8.藤本哲也(2005)。刑事政策概論。青林書院。  延伸查詢new window
9.染田惠(2006)。犯罪者の社会内処遇の探求:処遇の多様化と修復的司法。成文堂。  延伸查詢new window
10.Ann H. Crowe(2002)。Offender Supervision With Electronic Technology。  new window
11.McCold, P.(1996)。The role of community in restorative justice。Restorative Justice: International Perspectives。Monesy, NY。  new window
12.Renzema, Marc(1992)。Home Confinement Programs:Development, Implementation, and Impact。lurigio and Joan Petersilia, in Smart Sentencing: the Emergence of Intermediate Sanction。  new window
13.片山徒有(2003)。犯罪被害者支援は何をめざすのか-被害者から支援者、地域社会への架け橋。現代人文社。  延伸查詢new window
14.加藤東治郎(1984)。更生緊急保護制度。現代刑罰大系 第1 卷 現代社会における刑罰の理論。  延伸查詢new window
15.平野龍一(1996)。刑法概說。東京大學。  延伸查詢new window
16.林房雄、三島由紀夫合著(1966)。対話˙日本人論。  延伸查詢new window
17.法務省(2006)。平成17 年法務年鑑。  延伸查詢new window
18.南博(2003)。從明治維新到現代。  延伸查詢new window
19.瀨川晃(1982)。保護観察と民間篤志家の役割。現代刑罰法大系,第 7卷,犯罪者の社会復帰。  延伸查詢new window
20.西原春夫、松尾浩也編。現代刑罰法大系,第7 卷,犯罪者の社会復帰。  延伸查詢new window
21.恒川京子(1981)。保護司制度について。日本の矯正と保護 第3 卷˙保護編。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.法務省網站(2008)。法務省の紹介。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top