:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:籃球比賽是怎麼「打」法--從道德思維模式檢驗SBL運動道德衝突
書刊名:運動文化研究
作者:宋宏璋
作者(外文):Sung, Hung-jang
出版日期:2008
卷期:7
頁次:頁55-142
主題關鍵詞:超級籃球聯賽黑爾道德衝突SBLHareMoral conflict
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:44
在一般肢體衝突的情境之下,大多數的球員不會有太強烈的道德聯想,因為他們可以透過裁判或規則進而取得補償(如:罰球、對方技術犯規)。但是當上述「訴諸制度或規則」的條件不成立時,有些球員卻會透過不合常理(打架)的方式,來達成某種心態上的平衡或藉以傳達某種訊息,有時甚至會演變為更激烈的群體打架事件。「打架就是不對」是一條道德黃金定律嗎?道德衝突的情境似乎不斷地在運動場上演,到底運動員該採取怎樣的道德判斷來解決運動場上的兩難困境呢?本研究將以SBL2006~2007年第四季第五場例行賽(達欣虎vs.東風鷹)為研究個案,透過深度訪談個案中的兩位運動員來搜集資料,採用紮根理論研究法並搭配Atlas. ti 5.0質化研究分析軟體作為工具,來對資料進行編碼。研究者希望進入分析資料的研究歷程之後,能夠從資料中衍生出理論。藉由多個面向來澄清兩位臺灣職業籃球運動員個案如何面對道德兩難困境。因此,整理出的研究結果為:(一)籃球比賽是怎麼打的?(二)籃球比賽就是這樣打的!以及,最後的結論:(一)職業球員必須謹守職場倫理,以發揮自身的運動能力為本分;(二)信任裁判相同的執法標準;(三)堅持「作弊是不對的」黃金定律,運動員必須在公平的原則下競爭;(四)尊重對手與籃球文化;(五)傳統主義觀點雖不見得完美,但是它可以讓你巧妙地運用策略,獲得對手的尊重以及良好的社會形象;(六)相信運動員有能力去解決運動道德衝突。
When physical clash occurs on the basketball court, most players would not associate the clash with strong moral connection, because they can get the compensation from the referees or the rules (ex: free throw; adversarial technical foul). However, when the above-mentioned conditions (appealing to the systems or the rules) can't bring into existence, some players would resort to unreasonable behavior (fighting) or even group fighting to express their discontent or protest. Is it (It's wrong to fight) a moral Golden Law? The circumstances of moral conflict seem to appear on the playing court constantly. What moral judgments should players adopt to solve the dilemmas on the court? The researcher would adopt the Game 5 of 4th season on SBL (Dacintigers vs. Azioeagles) of 2006~2007 to be the sample and collect relevant data form in-depth interview with two basketball athletes. Grounded theory is the methodology employed in the research and Qualitative Research-Analysis software Atlas. ti 5.0 is used to encode the data. The researcher hopes to derive the theory during the process of data-analysis. The researcher also attempts to clarify how the two Taiwan professional basketball players face the moral dilemmas. As a result, the researching outcome found that: (1) How to play basketball games? (2) The way to play basketball games. The conclusions are: (1) Professional players must abide by the professional ethics, and that's player's job to bring his/her sporting ability into full play; (2) To trust the referees' judgments; (3)To insist the Golden Law-It's wrong to cheat; (4) To respect the competitors and the cultures of basketball; (5) The traditionalism is not perfect, but it makes you use the strategies capably, and thus obtain competitors' respect and good social images; (6) To trust that the athletes are able to deal with the moral conflict on the court.
期刊論文
1.Dixon, N.(2007)。Trash talking, respect for opponents and good competition。Sport Ethics and Philosophy,1(1),97-105。  new window
2.Feezell, R.(2005)。Celebrated Athletes, Moral Exemplars, and Lusory Objects。Journal of the Philosophy of Sport,32. 1,20-35。  new window
學位論文
1.黃碩斌(2004)。臺灣道德教育問題分析-以體罰作為分析指標,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Hare, R. M.(1981)。Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.宋瑛堂(譯)、卡勒漢(David Callahan)(原作者)(2006)。《作弊的文化》(The Cheating Culture)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.彭薇霓。巴特勒耍嘴皮 巫師逃出噩夢。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE