資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.218.244.154)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Critical Language Testing: A Case Study of the General English Proficiency Test
書刊名:
英語教學
作者:
施智閔
作者(外文):
Shih, Chih-min
出版日期:
2008
卷期:
32:3
頁次:
頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:
評判性語言測驗
;
全民英檢
;
學位要求
;
Critical language testing
;
General English proficiency test
;
Degree requirement
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
3
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:0
點閱:29
Shohamy (2001b) 提出了評判性語言評量的理論,提倡考生應該擁有質疑考試本身、考試的價值、以及考試方法的權利。她也相信參與測驗者有時對考試看法獨特,而測驗機構能夠向考生學習。為了回應Shohamy的評判性語言評量的理論,本研究調查受訪者對於全民英檢相關議題的看法。本研究涵蓋的主題包括考生對於將全民英檢納入畢業門檻的看法,以及考生認為全民英檢有哪些方面可以改善。全部受訪的學生家人以及大約60%的受訪學生支持將全民英檢納入畢業門檻這個政策。除此之外,學生們並建議語測中心以不同的方式施行聽力測驗、發展出真實的口說測驗、消除口說測驗中周圍考生發出的吵雜聲造成的干擾、降低報名費、美化答案卡、於知名的地點設立考場、致力於其證書獲得國際間的承認,以及更頻繁的施行全民英檢的測驗。
以文找文
Shohamy (2001b) proposed her theory of critical language testing, advocating that test takers should have the right to question the test itself, its value and its methods. She also believes that test takers' views of the test are sometimes unique and test institutions can learn from test takers. To echo Shohamy's theory of critical language testing, this study investigated participants' viewpoints of GEPT-related issues. Topics covered in this study include test takers' opinions about using the GEPT as one of theft degree requirements, and the aspects of the GEPT which they believed can be improved. When it came to adopting the GEPT as a degree requirement, all students' families and approximately sixty percent of the students I interviewed endorsed this policy. In addition, students suggested that the LTTC administer listening comprehension questions in a different manner, develop a more authentic speaking test, eliminate the interference caused by the babble of surrounding examinees ill the speaking test, roll back the registration fees, do a facelift of the answer sheets, provide test centers at well-known locations, endeavor to acquire international recognition for its certificates, and administer the GEPT more frequently.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Shih, C. M.(2007)。A new washback model of students' learning。The Canadian Modern Language Review,64(1),135-162。
2.
Qi, L.(2005)。Stakeholders' conflicting aims undermine the washback function of a high-stakes test。Language Testing,22,142-173。
3.
Shohamy, Elana(1998)。Critical language testing and beyond。Studies in Educational Evaluation,24(4),331-345。
4.
Shohamy, Elana(2001)。Democratic assessment as an alternative。Language Testing,18,373-391。
5.
Shohamy, Elana、Donitsa-Schmidt, S.、Ferman, I.(1996)。Text impact revisited: Washback effect over time。Language Testing,13,298-317。
會議論文
1.
Kunnan, A. J.(2004)。Test fairness。Cambridge。27-48。
圖書
1.
Bachman, Lyle F.、Palmer, Adrian S.(1996)。Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests。Oxford University Press。
2.
Rubin, H. J.、Rubin, I. S.(1995)。Qualitative Interviewing: the Art of Hearing Data。Sage Publications。
3.
Holstein, James A.、Gubrium, Jaber F.(1995)。The Active Interview。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。
4.
Anderson, G.(1998)。Fundamentals of educational research。Fundamentals of educational research。London。
5.
Ary, D.、Jacobs, L. C.、Razavieh, A.(2002)。Introduction to research in education。Introduction to research in education。Belmont, CA。
6.
Kahn, James V.、Best, John W.(2003)。Research in education。Research in education。Boston。
7.
Brown, H. Douglas(2004)。Language assessment: Principles and classrom practices。Language assessment: Principles and classrom practices。New York。
8.
Byrne, B.(2004)。Qualitative interviewing。Researching society and culture。London。
9.
Gochros, H. L.(2005)。Interviewing。Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative qpproaches。New York。
10.
Language Training and Testing Center(2002)。正式測驗考題(中級─1)。正式測驗考題(中級─1)。Taipei, Taiwan。
延伸查詢
11.
General English Proficiency Test。General English Proficiency Test。
12.
Shohamy, Elana(2001)。The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests。The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests。Essex, England。
其他
1.
International Language Testing Association(2000)。Code of Ethics for ILTA。
2.
Language Training and Testing Center。Elementary。
3.
Language Training and Testing Center。Intermediate。
4.
Language Training and Testing Center。High-intermediate。
圖書論文
1.
Punch, M.(1994)。Politics and ethics in qualitative research。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。
2.
Schmidt, C.(2004)。The analysis of semi-structured interviews。A companion to qualitative research。London:Sage Publication。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
探究大學英語能力畢業門檻與學習動機、測驗焦慮、測驗表現之關係
2.
Investigating the Score Dependability and Decision Dependability of the GEPT Listening Test: A Multivariate Generalizability Theory Approach
3.
Two Decades of Changes in the English Ability of Freshmen at a University in Taiwan
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code