資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.59.20.48)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Constructing and Employing the Appraising Model of Intangible Assets
書刊名:
交大管理學報
作者:
林亭汝
/
沈永祺
/
胡菊芬
/
孫嘉祈
作者(外文):
Lin, Grace T. R.
/
Shen, Yung-chi
/
Hu, Ju-feng
/
Sun, Chia-chi
出版日期:
2009
卷期:
29:2
頁次:
頁131-161
主題關鍵詞:
無形資產
;
價值驅動力
;
層級分析法
;
AHP法
;
評鑑模型
;
高科技產業
;
企業評價
;
VIKOR
;
Intangible assets
;
Value drivers
;
Analytic hierarchy process
;
Evaluation model
;
Hi-tech industry
;
Business appraisal
;
VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:71
本研究並無試圖評估無形資產之絕對價值,而是想藉由價值驅動力(value drivers)概念探討各公司無形資產之相對價值比重,本研究認為價值驅動力的概念將能清楚瞭解各公司無形資產是如何被創造。本研究將層級分析(AHP)法應用至無形資產之評鑑程序上,此乃因AHP法能夠將非財務性的價值驅動力加以量化並評估出其對無形資產之貢獻權比:本研究主要目的為:1、建構一嘗試性(tentative)之無形資產評鑑模型,協助企業正確評估公司價值比重並避免在衡量企業價值時因以財務報表為主要依據而產生盲點。2、有鑑於高科技產業無形資產佔總資產比例甚高,本研究乃以台灣新竹科學園區6大產業及一個案例模擬作為研究標的,以期實證本研究模型之可行性,並探討不同高科技產業間之無形資產之價值比重及評價應用。本研究之實證結果為建構不同科技產業理想之無形資產配置,顯示不同產業之無形資產特色,並可輔助企業評價及提升價值基礎管理成效。
以文找文
This paper does not intend to actually valuate intangible assets but focuses to investigate the relative value distribution of corporate intangible assets, and this links closely to the concept and application of value drivers. That is because we believe that drivers or attributes of the value significantly determine how virtual value of these intangibles can be created for companies. We apply the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to the appraising process of intangible assets. The AHP method can mainly sort the non-financial value drivers in order according to their weighted contributions. The key purpose of this paper is to construct a tentative model for the evaluation of intangible assets, which helps business to more correctly appraise corporate value ratios and avoid bias due to mainly relying on financial statements when measuring an entity value. In addition, in view of the significant proportion of intangible assets over total assets in high-technology industries, this research then takes six industries in Hsinchu Science Park and one virtual case as the research objects in order to test the applicability of our model, as well as exploring the value weights of intangible assets and its evaluation amongst different high-technology industries. Besides, the empirical result of this paper is mainly to support business appraisal and thus improve the effectiveness of value based management.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Dubin, J. A.(2007)。Valuing intangible assets with a nested logit market share model。Journal of Econometrics,139(2),285-302。
2.
Kalafut, P. C.、Low, J.(2001)。The Value Creation Index: Quantifying Intangible Value。Strategy & Leadership,29(5),9-15。
3.
Hamel, Gary(1991)。Competition for Competence and Inter Partner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances。Strategic Management Journal,12(S1),83-103。
4.
Opricovic, S.、Tzeng, G. H.(2002)。Multicriteria Planning of Post-Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction。Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering,17(3),211-220。
5.
Opricovic, S.、Tzeng, G. H.(2004)。Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS。European Journal of Operational Research,156(2),445-455。
6.
Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(2004)。Measuring the Strategic Readiness of Intangible Assets。Harvard Business Review,82(2),52-63。
7.
Johnson, W. H. A.(1999)。An Integrative Taxonomy of Intellectual Capital: Measuring the Stock and Flow of Intellectual Capital Components in the Firm。International Journal of Technology Management,18(5-8),562-575。
8.
Feltham, Gerald A.、Ohlson, James A.(1995)。Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities。Contemporary Accounting Research,11(2),689-731。
9.
Opricovic, S.、Tzeng, G.-H.(2007)。Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods。European Journal of Operational Research,178(2),514-529。
10.
Chan, Louis K. C.、Lakonishok, Josef、Sougiannis, Theodore(2001)。The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures。Journal of Finance,56(6),2431-2456。
11.
Chang, S. H.、Wu, J. H.、Li, Z.(1996)。Frequency Synthesizer Product or/and Process Optimization Using the Grey Rational Analysis。Journal of Grey System,3,235-260。
12.
Chiu, Y. J.、Chen, Y. W.(2007)。Using AHP in Patent Valuation。Mathematical and Computer Modelling,46(7/ 8),1054-1062。
13.
Johnson, L. D.、Neave, E. H.、Pazderka, B.(2002)。Knowledge, Innovation and Share Value。International Journal of Management Reviews,4(2),101-134。
14.
Lin, G. T. R.、Lin, J.(2006)。Ethical Customer Value Creation: Drivers and Barriers。Journal of Business Ethics,67(1),93-105。
會議論文
1.
Luthy, D. H.(1998)。Intellectual Capital and Its Measurement。Osaka, Japan。
2.
William, S.(2001)。On-line Professional Development for Ohio's K-12 Educators: A Key to Student Success on The Ohio Graduation Test。
研究報告
1.
Sveiby, K. E.(2002)。Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets。Helsinki, Finland:Hanken Business School。
學位論文
1.
Opricovic, S.(1998)。Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems(博士論文)。Faculty of Civil Engineering University of Belgrade,Belgrade。
2.
Kayo, E. K.(2002)。Capital Structure and Risk of Tangible and Intangible-intensive Companies: A Contribution of Studying of Firm Valuation, PhD Dissertation。
圖書
1.
Saaty, T. L.(1998)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co.。
2.
Deng, J. L.(1990)。A Course on Grey System Theory。Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press。
3.
Stewart, Thomas A.(1997)。Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations。New York:Bantam DoubIeday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.。
4.
Lev, Baruch(2001)。Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting。Brookings Institution Press。
5.
Saaty, Thomas L.(1996)。Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process。RWS Publications。
6.
Kotler, Philip、Ang, S. H.、Leong, S. M.、Tan, C. T.(2003)。Marketing management: An Asian perspective。Prentice Hall。
7.
Kelso, L. O.、Adler, M. J.(1958)。The Capitalist Manifesto。The Capitalist Manifesto。New York, NY。
8.
Mathis, R. L.、Jackson, J. H.(2003)。Human Resource Management, Cincinnati。Human Resource Management, Cincinnati。Ohio。
9.
Sveiby, K. E.(1997)。The New Organization Wealth: Managing and Measuring。The New Organization Wealth: Managing and Measuring。San Francisco, CA。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
以無形資產分析領導者與追隨者之價值創造策略--比較美國及臺灣之生技產業
2.
無形資產價值驅動因子之研究--以臺灣生化科技產業為例
3.
層級分析法與資料包絡分析法在智慧資本效率衡量之比較--臺灣半導體與光電產業之實證
4.
精品品牌策略的財務特徵與績效
5.
全球化趨勢下臺灣高科技產業代工能力之探討
6.
跨國無形資產價值驅動因子之研究--以臺灣、美國IC設計業為例
7.
高科技產業股票之評價--實質選擇權評價法
1.
以無形資產分析價值創造策略-美國及台灣IC設計產業之實證分析
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
Product-Mix Decision Integrated with ABC for Better Profitability Management: The Case of Communications Equipment Firm in Taiwan
2.
The Relationship between Stress and Nursing Errors: The Moderating Role of Professional Ethics
3.
The Role of the Manager's Human Capital in Mandatory and Voluntary Disclosures
4.
Open Business Model: An Empirical Study of IC Industry
5.
Can Firm Size and Firm Age Moderate Firm Behavioral Momentum?
6.
Examining the Moderating Effect of Occupational Commitment on Contract Breach-Job Stress Relations
7.
Exploring the Creativity Performance of Virtual Teams from the Perspectives of Leadership and Creative Personality
8.
Compensation, Life Cycle, and the Value Relevance of Performance Measures
9.
A Study of the Relationship between the Characteristics of Internationalization Course and Performance: The Degree, Velocity, and Rhythm of Internationalization
10.
To Develop the Strategies of the Medical Tourism Industry in Taiwan by Using GRA and TRIZ: The Japanese Consumer Viewpoint
11.
How does Corporate Governance Affect Firm Performance?--The Mediating Role of Agency Costs
12.
The Impacts of Supply Chain Relational Benefit on Inter-Organizational Knowledge Sharing: Cross Validation of SEM
13.
Key Factors for Intangible Asset Value Creation: The Empirical Study of Computer and Peripheral Firms
14.
The Optimal Pricing and Production Strategy for Homogeneous Product under Incomplete Information and Duopoly
15.
Exploring Multilevel Perspective of Leader-member Exchange Relevant to Performance Appraisal Satisfaction
QR Code