:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:已知與全新的架構用於內容編排對讀者閱讀理解能力之影響
書刊名:高雄師大學報. 人文與藝術類
作者:曾榮梅 引用關係林漢裕 引用關係傅星惠
作者(外文):Tsen, Jung-meiLin, Han-yuFu, Hsing-hui
出版日期:2009
卷期:27
頁次:頁181-193
主題關鍵詞:已知與全新編排閱讀理解Given and newLayoutReading comprehension
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
有些研究指出插圖可增加文字內容的趣味,吸引讀者的注意力,並幫助理解內容,但這些研究多探討角色、背景、和風格等方向,較少去探討圖與文的編排和讀者理解間的關係。因此本研究嘗試以Kress 和Leeuwen (1996) 提出的「已知和全新 (givenand new) 版面配置」的論點,作為探討此議題的基礎,Kress 和Leeuwen 分析一頁面中兩個圖像的關係,並且定義左邊的圖像代表「已知」的訊息,是讀者、大眾已經知道的訊息;右邊的圖像則是「全新」的觀點,是人們要去注意的新訊息。然而,Kress和Leeuwen 卻未提及文章內容的擺放位置,是否也可套用已知與全新的概念。有鑑於此,本研究將針對圖文並茂的現有文章,依據Kress 和Leeuwen 對已知與全新版面配置的定義,對內文做出四種不同樣式的編排,探討讀者在閱讀每一頁面後,是否會因為編排方式的不同,影響其閱讀理解能力。研究結果顯示,讀者對內文置於已知部分 (即左側),且在圖片位置之上方的編排類型,其閱讀理解能力較其他類型為佳。本研究結果期能對未來版面編排和其相關研究,提供參考。
Some researches showed that pictures could increase the interest of contents, attract readers' attention, and help them understand the words. Most of the researches focused much more on the roles, backgrounds, styles and so on, than on the relationship between the layout of pictures and words and readers' comprehension. Therefore, we tried to apply Kress and Leeuwen's view, the structure of Given and New, in our study. In this structure of Given and New, Kress and Leeuwen analyzed the relation between two pictures on one page. They defined the picture on the left side representing the "Given" information which is known by people, whereas the picture on the right side means the "New" information which people want to know. However, they didn't indicate that the layout of the contents of the words could be imitated in this structure. Therefore, with the four present articles with two pictures and the contents, we applied the structure to replace the contents in four different style layouts. We expected to know, after readers read one article, whether the layout could affect their comprehension. The result showed that the readers' reading comprehension is better when the content was placed on the given part (the left side) and above the picture. It is hoped that the result could improve the layout and its researches in the future.
期刊論文
1.Just, M. A.、Carpenter, P. A.(1992)。A capacity theory of comprehension: In-dividual differences in working memory。Psychological Review,99(1),122-149。  new window
2.Pressley, M.、Johnson, C. J.、Symons, S.、McGoldrick, J. A.、Kurita, J. A.(1989)。Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text。The Elementary School Journal,90(1),3-32。  new window
3.宋振韶(2005)。教科書插圖的認知心理學研究。北京師範大學學報,6,22-26。  延伸查詢new window
4.Peeck, J.(1974)。Retention of pictorial and verbal content of a text with illustrations。Journal of Educational Psychology,66,880-888。  new window
5.Weissberg, R. C.(1984)。Given and New: Paragraph Development Models from Scientific English。TESOL Quarterly,18(3),485-500。  new window
學位論文
1.賴如珊(2001)。雜誌編排設計形式與讀者意象與符合度比較之研究(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱月玲(2002)。不同的科學圖文配置對學生閱讀學習的影響-以「月相概念」為例(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡宛珊(2005)。成人讀者對圖畫書的解讀--以幾米作品為例(碩士論文)。世新大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.葉珊吟(2007)。九年一貫國小低年級國語教科書插圖效能之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.溫維鈞(2004)。以圖片和文章表達空間訊息之差異探討(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李玉慶(2000)。自然科網路教學設計模式之研究--以國小「認識魚類」為例(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.賴郁芳(1998)。常用中文印刷字體之易讀性及其意象研究(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gagne, E. D.、Yekovich, C. W.(1998)。The cognitive psychology of school learning。New York, NY:Harper Collins Colledge Publisher。  new window
2.李凌霄(1990)。成功的編輯。台北:世界文物。  延伸查詢new window
3.日本視覺設計研究所(1987)。編排與構成。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.李天來(1997)。新視覺設計PART1 DM 廣告型錄。台北:義之堂。  延伸查詢new window
5.桑尼、Kress, G.,、Leeuwen, T. V.(1999)。Reading Images:The Grammar of Visual Design。台北。  new window
6.黃中憲、Pearce, F.(2008)。地球相簿:劇變的一百年。香港。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE