資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.223.123.19)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Modeling Patent Legal Value by Back Propagation Neural Network
書刊名:
臺大管理論叢
作者:
賴以軒
/
車慧中
作者(外文):
Lai, Yi-hsuan
/
Che, Hui-chung
出版日期:
2010
卷期:
20:S1
頁次:
頁147-177
主題關鍵詞:
專利鑑價
;
因素分析
;
倒傳遞神經網路
;
Patent valuation
;
Factor analysis
;
Back propagation neural network
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:20
本研究基於專利的法律本質,提出專利法律價值的評價模型。專利侵權訴訟的「判罰金額」被定義為專利可被量化的法律價值。經由調查美國德拉瓦州、加州與德州等三州聯邦地方法院的資料,得到4,289 個專利相關訴訟案例,再藉由縝密的篩選得到65 個具有判罰金額的有效樣本。本研究採用了17 個量化的專利指標,經由因素分析將其縮減為9個萃取因子。由多元迴歸分析篩選出對判罰金額影響較為顯著的6 個萃取因子。再倒傳遞神經網路建構專利評價模型,其中6 個萃取因子作為輸入變數,判罰金額則為輸出變數。藉由誤差分析與驗證,此專利評價模型具有預測能力,可應用於評估專利訴訟所可能產生的判罰金額,並協助原告與被告兩造雙方的談判。
以文找文
This study aimed at the basis of patent law and proposed a valuation model for the monetary legal value of patents. The damage award of a patent infringement lawsuit was deemed to be the legal value of a patent. 65 Effective samples of infringement lawsuits were extracted from 4,289 patent related lawsuits in U.S. district courts of Delaware, California and Texas. 17 quantitative patent indicators were summarized to describe dimensions of a patent. 9 extracted factors were generated from the 17 patent indicators by Factor analysis. The multiregression was applied to find the nonlinearity between the damage award and 9 extracted factors. 6 extracted factors which having higher influence to the damage award were thereby suggested via the multi-regression. The Back Propagation Neural Network was applied to construct the valuation model, wherein the 6 extracted factors were the inputs and the damage award was the output. The proposed valuation model was validated to have the predictive power by error analysis. It accommodated to valuate the possible damage award or to negotiate the settlement fee in disputing patent infringement lawsuits. It also contributed to patent transaction, patent licensing and hypothecation of intangible assets, etc.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Avery, D.、Narin, F.、Albert, M. B.、McAllister, P. H.(1991)。Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents。Research Policy,20(3),251-259。
2.
Harhoff, D.、Scherer, F. M.、Vopel, K.(2003)。Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights。Research Policy,32(8),1343-1363。
3.
Hirschey, M.、Richardson, V. J.(2001)。Valuation effects of patent quality: A comparison for Japanese and US firms。Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,9(1),65-82。
4.
Hirschey, M.、Richardson, V. J.(2004)。Are Scientific Indicators of Patent Quality Useful to Investors?。Journal of Empirical Finance,11(1),91-107。
5.
Lanjouw, Jean O.、Pakes, Ariel、Putnam, Jonathan(1998)。How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: The Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data。The Journal of Industrial Economics,46(4),405-432。
6.
Thomas, P.(2001)。A relationship between technology indicators and stock market performance。Scientometrics,51(1),319-333。
7.
Tong, X.、Frame, J. D.(1994)。Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data。Research Policy,23(2),133-141。
8.
Cockburn, Iain、Griliches, Zvi(1988)。Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in The Stock Market's Valuation of R&D and Patents。The American Economic Review,78(2),419-423。
9.
Lanjouw, Jean O.、Schankerman, Mark(2001)。Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition。RAND Journal of Economics,32(1),129-151。
10.
Reitzig, M.(2004)。Improving patent valuations for management purposes: validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales。Research Policy,33(6/7),939-957。
11.
Hall, Bronwyn H.、Jaffe, Adam、Trajtenberg, Manuel(2005)。Market value and patent citations。RAND Journal of Economics,36(1),16-38。
12.
Deng, Zhen、Lev, Baruch、Narin, Francis(1999)。Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance。Financial Analysts Journal,55(3),20-32。
13.
Chiu, Y. J.,、Chen, Y. W.(2007)。Using AHP in patent valuation。Mathematical and Computer Modeling,46 (7/8):,1054-1062。
14.
Choy, C., Kim, S.,、Park, Y.(2007)。A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact: The case of information and communication technology。Technological Forecasting & Social Change,74 (8),1296-1314。
15.
Hereof, D.、Hoisl, K.(2007)。Institutionalized incentives for ingenuity-patent value and the German Employees' Inventions Act。Research Policy,36(8),1143-1162。
16.
Lanjouw, J. O.(1998)。Patent protection in the shadow of infringement: Simulation estimations of patent value。The Review of Economic Studies,65(4),671-710。
17.
Park, Y.、Park, G.(2004)。A new method for technology valuation in monetary value:Procedure and application。Technovation,24(5),387-394。
18.
Reitzig, M.、Henkel, J.、Heath, C.(2007)。On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey:Unrealistic damage awards and firms' strategies of being infringed。Research Policy,36 (1),134-154。
19.
Silverberg, Gerald、Verspagenb, Bart(2007)。The size distribution of innovations revisited: An application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance。Journal of Econometrics,139(2),318-339。
20.
Van Trieste, S.、Vis, W.(2007)。Valuing patents on cost-reducing technology: A case study。International Journal of Production Economics,105(1),282-292。
21.
Von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T.,、Rost, K.(2005)。Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis。Research Policy,34 (10),1591-1607。
研究報告
1.
Lanjouw, Jean O.、Schankerman, Mark(1997)。Stylized Facts of Patent Litigation: Value, Scope and Ownership。National Bureau of Economic Research。
圖書
1.
Reilly, R. F.、Schweihs, R. P.(1998)。Valuating integible assets。New York, NY:McGraw Hill。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
1.
以美國專利侵權訴訟判決建構專利鑑價模型之研究
1.
以美國專利侵權訴訟判決建構專利鑑價模型之研究
2.
以美國專利侵權訴訟判決建構專利鑑價模型之研究
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code