:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國際港埠物流中心關鍵能力評估之研究:模糊多準則決策之應用
書刊名:航運季刊
作者:梁金樹丁吉峰張瑈恩
作者(外文):Liang, Gin-shuhDing, Ji-fengChang, Rou-en
出版日期:2009
卷期:18:4
頁次:頁19-44
主題關鍵詞:國際港埠物流中心關鍵能力模糊多準則決策International port logistics centerKey capabilityFuzzy MCDM
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:24
本文旨在藉由模糊多準則決策法構建國際港埠物流中心關鍵能力之評估模式。首先,經由相關文獻的探討與請益相關學者之意見,本文彙整出較為重要的二十二個能力項目,以供評選關鍵能力。其次,引用平衡計分卡之觀念,共計篩選出四個主準則與二十五個次準則。進而,本文以所建構之模糊多準則評選模式,配合國內某A國際商港為例,藉以說明該港發展國際港埠物流中心所具備的關鍵能力。最後,研究顯示國際港埠物流中心所具備的關鍵能力,較具優勢者依序為:「服務知覺能力」、「國際運輸及配送能力」、「品質知覺能力」、「專業物流人才之培育與技術取得能力」、「港埠行銷能力」、「科技資訊系統應用能力」、「裝卸作業制度之管理能力」。
The main purpose of this paper is to develop an evaluation model of key capabilities for international port logistics centers using fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. At first, combining the historical literature, the concepts of the balanced scorecard, professional and experts' opinions as well as using a designed questionnaire investigation, a hierarchical structure with four main criteria, twenty-five sub-criteria for twenty-two capabilities of international port logistics centers is constructed. Then, a case study is utilized to demonstrate the proposed fuzzy MCDM algorithm to evaluate the key capabilities. Finally, the empirical results for the A international port logistics center show that eight key capabilities are service perception capability, transportation and distribution capability, quality perception capability, professional expert and technology, port marketing, application of information technology, and handling management capability.
期刊論文
1.Chang, P. L. and Chen, Y. C.(1994)。A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Method for Technology Transfer Strategy Selection in Biotechnology。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol. 63, No. 2,pp. 131-139。  new window
2.Hafeez, K.、Zhang, Y.、Malak, N.(2002)。Determining Key Capabilities of a Firm Using Analytic Hierarchy Process。International Journal of Production Economics,76(1),39-51。  new window
3.Zadeh, L. A.(1976)。The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning。Information Sciences,9(1),43-80。  new window
4.Hafeez, Khalid、Zhang, Yan Bing、Malak, Naila(2002)。Core Competence for Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Structured Methodology for Identifying Core Competence。IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,49(1),28-35。  new window
5.Chen, S. H.(1985)。Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing and minimizing set。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17(2),113-129。  new window
6.Dubois, D.、Prade, H.(1978)。Operation on Fuzzy Numbers。International Journal of Systems Sciences,9(6),613-626。  new window
7.Zadeh, L. A.(1975)。The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning。Information Sciences,8,199-249。  new window
8.Zadeh, L. A.(1975)。The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning。Information Sciences,8(4),301-357。  new window
9.Kim, K.、Park, K. S.(1990)。Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Index of Optimism。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,35(2),143-150。  new window
10.Long, Carl、Vickers-Koch, Mary(1995)。Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage。Organizational Dynamics,24(1),7-22。  new window
11.呂錦山(20010600)。國際港埠物流中心選擇因素之探討--結構方程模式之應用。航運季刊,10(2),1-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Prahalad, Coimbatore K.、Hamel, Gary(1990)。The core competence of the corporation。Harvard Business Review,68(3),79-91。  new window
13.Chen, Shan-huo(19850400)。Operations on Fuzzy Numbers with Function Principle。Tamkang Journal of Management Sciences,6(1),13-25。  new window
14.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
15.Liou, Tian-Shy、Wang, Mao-Jiun J.(1992)。Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Integral Value。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,50(3),247-255。  new window
16.Bortolan, G.、Degani, R.(1985)。A review of some methods for ranking fuzzy subsets。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,15(1),1-19。  new window
17.Chow, W. C. and Haddad, M.(1997)。“Applying the Balance Scorecard to Small Companies”。Management Accounting,Vol. 1, No. 2,pp. 21-27。  new window
18.Kent, J. L and Parker, R. S.(1999)。“Interna tional Containership Carrier Selection Criteria: Shippers/Carriers Differences”。International Journal of Physical Distribution Logistics Management,Vol. 29, No. 6,pp. 398-408。  new window
會議論文
1.陳春益、林正章、呂錦山、陳明華、游芳來、蔡明泰、張雅富、王以南(1999)。發展高雄港為國際物流中心之探討。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.黃文吉(2001)。“基隆港區開辦物流業務行動計畫及運量之開發及分析”。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉書嵐(2004)。層級分析法與灰關聯應用於港埠物流中心區位選擇--從海運承攬業的角度(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁吉峰(2005)。國際商港關鍵能力評選模式之構建及其應用(博士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王昭傑(2001)。高雄港發展國際物流營運策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.王世志(2002)。以平衡計分卡觀點作航運業經營策略與經營績效之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。國立海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.張耿禎(2006)。國際港埠物流中心競爭力評估準則之研究--以東亞五大港埠為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.李政欣(2004)。我國港埠物流法律相關問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣海洋大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.王彙喬(2004)。“模糊多準則決策應用在我國貨櫃碼頭物流競爭力評比之研究”。  延伸查詢new window
8.王美善(2005)。“臺灣地區航運業策略規劃與平衡計分卡實施績效之研究─以船舶運送業為例”。  延伸查詢new window
9.林科希(2002)。“貨櫃集散站自主管理與傳統管理之經營績效比較研究:平衡計分卡之應用”。  延伸查詢new window
10.林千郁(2003)。“台灣地區物流業經營績效與關鍵成功因素之研究”。  延伸查詢new window
11.林文晟(2006)。“結合平衡計分卡與智慧資本建構定期航運業經營績效評估模式之研究”。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳湘力(2006)。“廠商選擇國際物流中心決策因素之研究”。  延伸查詢new window
13.靳惠如(2001)。“模糊多準則應用於臺灣國際商港港區物流中心區位評選之研究─以基隆港為例”。  延伸查詢new window
14.廖瑞澤(2001)。“台灣地區國際港埠物流中心服務屬性之研究─從海運承攬運送業觀點”。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉知新(2004)。“台灣國際港埠運籌體系競爭策略之研究”。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bowersox, Donald J.、Closs, David J.(1996)。Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process。McGraw-Hill。  new window
2.Kaplan, Robert S.、Norton, David P.(1996)。The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action。Boston:Harvard Business School Press。  new window
3.倪安順(2004)。“港埠經營與管理”。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hamel, G.(1994)。The concept of core competence。Competence-based competition。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top