資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.137.217.151)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
印巴「全面對話」復談協商過程之分析
書刊名:
問題與研究
作者:
陳純如
作者(外文):
Chen, Chun-ju
出版日期:
2009
卷期:
48:4
頁次:
頁153-188
主題關鍵詞:
全面對話
;
印巴關係
;
恐怖攻擊
;
Composite dialogue
;
Indian-Pakistan relations
;
Terrorism
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(
1
)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:0
點閱:19
從印度和巴基斯坦在1998 年決定進行「全面對話」(Composite Dialogue),到2004 年2 月印巴「全面對話」正式開展,期間受到兩國情勢及事件的阻撓,並在2006 年7 月中斷數月。印度和巴基斯坦也花很多時間和精力在討論對話條件以及所包括的議題。本文的焦點為2003 年及2006 年「全面對話」兩次復談協商的過程。本文將「全面對話」復談協商過程視為協調賽局,並分析、檢驗內部因素與外部壓力如何影響印巴對於復談協商的意願、相關合作成本,以及協商的結果。2003 年,由於印度內部情勢的變化,給了復談一個機會,而且在美國的關切下,印度將美國視為保證,同時因為雙方領導人的情況,製造了一種急迫感,而使得印度同意與巴基斯坦復談。而在2006 年7 月,印度因為孟買恐怖攻擊而宣布暫停「全面對話」中的外秘級會談,但是因為「全面對話」已進行三年,印巴之間也有若干合作措施,加上印度與美國正在進行核能合作的協商,因此,對話在三個月後恢復,而美國仍然扮演促進者和保證者的角色。
以文找文
India and Pakistan agreed to undertake “Composite Dialogue” in 1998. However, the dialogue did not take place substantially until February 2004. In the interim, the two countries were deterred from launching the dialogue officially by various kinds of domestic situations and events. In July of 2006, the dialogue was disrupted again for several months due to terrorism. In the meantime, India and Pakistan spent a lot of time and efforts in negotiating the conditions for the resumption of the dialogue and issues to be included. This paper will focus on the negotiation in 2003 and in 2006 for the resumption of composite dialogue. This paper will treat the negotiation as a coordination game (assurance game) and accordingly examine how domestic factors and external pressure affected the willingness, cost for cooperation, and the result of the negotiation. In 2003, change of the domestic situation in India provided a chance for the dialogue to resume. Under the concern of the United States, India regarded the United States as the provider of assurance. At the same time, given the situation of the leaders of India and Pakistan, a sense of urgency was created that prompted the two countries to resume “Composite Dialogue.” In July of 2006, India put off foreign secretary-level talk in the dialogue due to the terrorist attacks in Mumbai. However, the dialogue had been ongoing for three years, and India and Pakistan had adopted several confidence-building measures. In addition, India had engaged in negotiation with the United States on nuclear energy cooperation. Three months later, the talk resumed. The United States continued to facilitate and provide assurance to the negotiation.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Makeig, Douglas C.(1987)。War, No-war, and the India-Pakistan Negotiations Process。Pacific Affairs,60(2),271-294。
2.
陳文賢(2004)。印度與巴基斯坦和平談判的展望。中華歐亞基金會研究通訊,7(2)。
延伸查詢
3.
Asif, Bushra、Schaffer, Teresita C.(2004)。Pakistan: Parliamentary Elections and after。South Asia Monitor,66。
4.
Noorani, A. G.(2006)。There Is So Much to Gain Mutually。Frontline,23(16)。
圖書
1.
Fukuyama, F.(1995)。Trust: The Social Values and the Creation of Prosperity。New York:Free Press。
2.
Axelrod, Robert M.(1984)。The Evolution of Cooperation。Basic Books。
3.
(2006)。US-India Strategic Cooperation into the 21st Century。US-India Strategic Cooperation into the 21st Century。London, UK。
4.
Grove, Andrea K.(2007)。Political Leadership in Foreign Policy: Manipulating Support across Borders。Political Leadership in Foreign Policy: Manipulating Support across Borders。New York, NY。
5.
Gupta, Amit(2005)。The US-India Relationship: Strategic Partnership of Complementary Interest?。The US-India Relationship: Strategic Partnership of Complementary Interest?。Montgomery, AL。
6.
Hoffman, Aaron M.(2006)。Building Trust: Overcoming Suspicion in International Conflict。Building Trust: Overcoming Suspicion in International Conflict。Albany, NY。
7.
Kux, Dennis(2006)。India-Pakistan Negotiations: Is Past Still Prologue?。India-Pakistan Negotiations: Is Past Still Prologue?。Washington, D.C.。
8.
Kydd, Andrew H.(2007)。Trust and Mistrust in International Relations。Trust and Mistrust in International Relations。Princeton, NJ。
9.
(1993)。Dilemmas and National Security and Cooperation in India and Pakistan。Dilemmas and National Security and Cooperation in India and Pakistan。New York, NY。
10.
Rahman, Mushtaqur(1996)。Divided Kashmir: Old Problems, New Opportunities for India, Pakistan, and the Kashmiri People。Divided Kashmir: Old Problems, New Opportunities for India, Pakistan, and the Kashmiri People。Boulder, CO。
11.
Wirsing, Robert G.(2003)。Kashmir in the Shadow of War。Kashmir in the Shadow of War。Armonk, NY。
其他
1.
Andley, Priyashree(2007)。Third Composite Dialogue: An Overview of Indo-Pak Relations in 2006。
2.
Kronstadt, K. Alan(2002)。Elections in Kashmir。
3.
Manjunath, K. S.,Sridhar, Seema,Anand, Beryl(2006)。Indo-Pak Composite Dialogue, 2004-05: A Profile。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
失敗國家、國際衝突與信心建立措施:朝鮮半島危機之研究
無相關博士論文
1.
強權影響下的反恐戰爭--以巴基斯坦為例
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code