:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:主導性霸權的困境--九一一後國際局勢與美中臺關係演變
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:吳釗燮
作者(外文):Wu, Joseph Jaushieh
出版日期:2010
卷期:28:1
頁次:頁1-32
主題關鍵詞:九一一事件主導性霸權中國崛起區域性強權國際體系現實主義權力影響力美中關係美臺關係September 11Dominant powerRise of ChinaRegional powerInternational systemRealismPowerInfluenceSino-US relationsTaiwan-US relations
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:25
第二次世界大之後美蘇兩強各自主宰其集團的情勢,因前蘇聯的瓦解與冷戰結束而告終結,代之而起的是美國為主導性霸權 (dominant power) 的局面。在美國為全球獨霸的狀況下,國際活動與國際政治運作,也由美國所領導的西方世界所主導。但整體的國際環境,在2001年九一一事件發生之後又發生了微妙的變化。在一方面,美國投入了對阿富汗與伊拉克的戰爭,又需要面對北韓、伊朗等國際問題的挑戰;但另一方面,中國的經濟、軍事、外交方面的實力也大幅增進,雖然中國尚難成為一個可以取代前蘇聯的超強,但是美國的地位與影響力卻已經無法與九一一之前相比。在九一一事件之後國際局勢變化的過程,正足以提供學界驗證相關理論的機會。本文擬從體系理論與現實主義理論的觀點探討九一一事件之後國際局勢的變化,尤其針對中國國力崛起的因素與美國影響力變化的相關性加以檢視,並以美國對台的軍售政策為例,來探討當前的國際環境。
The world has come to face an entirely new situation with the end of the Cold War. The world system dominated by the United States and the former Soviet Union was no longer so with the collapse of the former Soviet Empire. The United States, consequently, became the only superpower which, with the help and support of its key allies, sets the international agenda and formulates international rules of the game on political, military and economic affairs. But since the United States has been the only superpower after the Cold War, the United States has carried a much heavier responsibility of maintaining peace and stability and international order. The U.S. dominance came to a subtle change after the September 11 terrorist attack. The U.S. threw itself into wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the ongoing wars cost dearly. In addition, the United States also has to cope with the danger of nuclearizing North Korea and Iran, shoulder responsibility of humanitarian disaster in the Sudan’s Darfur region, and meet the challenge of rising socialism and anti-American sentiment in its own backyard. At the same time, China’s power, in economic, military or political terms, has been increasing substantially. Even though China cannot equate itself with the economic and military power of the U.S. and replace the role played by the former Soviet Union, its influence can no longer be overlooked in international effort to resolve difficult issues. The process of international systemic change and the change of state behavior as well as power and influence provide an ample opportunity for the field of international relations to test the international theories. This paper starts from the perspective of system theory and realism, it explores the factor of the rise of China and the relative decline of American influence, with U.S. arms sale to Taiwan as an example, to better understand the current international environment.
期刊論文
1.沈明室(20081000)。美國對臺軍售波折的意涵。戰略安全研析,42,13-16。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊念祖(20090800)。中共海軍突穿第二島鏈爭議的剖析。戰略安全研析,52,28-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.丁樹範(20081000)。美國公佈軍售案的觀察。戰略安全研析,42,17-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Pham, J. Peter.(2006)。“China’s Africa Strategy and Its Implications for U.S. Interests.”。American Foreign Policy Interests,28,239-253。  new window
5.Sutter, Robert.(2009)。“China’s Power and the Fading U.S. Goal of ‘Balance’ in the Taiwan Strait.”。Asia Policy,8,3-9。  new window
6.Wu, Jaushieh.(2008)。“Arms Sales and the Future of U.S.-Taiwan-China Relations.”。China Brief 8,22,5-8。  new window
圖書
1.Pei, Minxin(2006)。China’s Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy。Cambridge, Mass:Harvard University Press。  new window
2.Shambaugh, David L.(2005)。Power Shift: China and Asia's New Dynamics。University of California Press。  new window
3.Jervis, R.、Lebow, R. N.、Stein, Janice Gross(1985)。Psychology and Deterrence。Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
4.Waltz, Kenneth N.(1979)。Theory of International Politic。Reading, Mass:Addison-Wesley Pub. Co。  new window
5.Friedman, T. L.(2007)。The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century。New York, NY:Picador。  new window
6.Terrill, Ross(2003)。The New Chinese Empire: And What It Means for the United States。New York:Basic Books。  new window
7.East, Maurice A.、Salmore , Stephen A.、Hermann , Charles F.(1978)。Why Nations Act-Theoretical Perspectives for Comparative Foreign Policy Studies。London:Beverly Hills:Sage Publications。  new window
8.Shirk, Susan L.(2007)。China: Fragile Superpower: How China's Internal Politics could Derail Its Peaceful Rise。Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Jervis, Robert(1978)。Perception and Misperception in International Politics。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
10.Allison, Graham T.(1971)。Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
11.Morgenthau, Hans J.、Thompson, Kenneth W.(1985)。Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
12.錢復(2005)。錢復回憶錄。臺北:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
13.Vasquez, John A.(1983)。The Power of Power Politics: A Critique。New Brunswick, New Jersey:Rutgers University Press。  new window
14.Keohane, Robert O.(1984)。After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy。Princeton University Press。  new window
15.Krasner, Stephen D.(1983)。International Regimes。Cornell University Press。  new window
16.Campbell Kurt M. and Michael E. O’Hanlon.(2006)。Hard Power: The New Politics of National Security。New York。  new window
17.Kaplan, Robert D.(2009)。“China’s Two-Oceans Strategy.”。China’s Arrival, A Strategic Framework for a Global Relationship。Washington DC。  new window
18.Rothstein, Robert L.(1991)。The Evolution of Theory in International Relations。Columbia。  new window
19.Sorman, Guy.(2008)。The Empire of Lies, The Turth About China in the Twenty-first Century。Asha Puri. trans.。New York。  new window
圖書論文
1.Sutter, Robert G.(2005)。China’s Rise in Asia: Promises, Prospects and Implications for the United States。APCSS Occasional Paper Series。Lahham:Rowman and Littlefield Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE